Working up to Iran now, the first real warning is made.

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Comrade, Sep 16, 2004.

  1. Comrade
    Offline

    Comrade Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    Ratings:
    +167
    http://news.ft.com/cms/s/eed88be8-0741-11d9-9672-00000e2511c8.html

    PNAC is usually on the ball. This is only the start of posturing for eventual use of force in Bush's re-election. Iran should give in if they are smart.
     
  2. padisha emperor
    Offline

    padisha emperor Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,564
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Aix-en-Provence, France
    Ratings:
    +53
    My question :
    USA say that Iran has nuke sites. well. So in a few months (weeks ?) USA will strikes Iran.
    In march, USA will probably say that Syria has nuke sites. So, in april, they will attack Syria - and also Jordania, US will do a group's price. Specila terms for Jordania.
    After, Lebanon, in january 2006. - incredible, but Lebanon will have always nuke sites.

    And while these war on Middle and Near East, a country, hostile to USA, with nuke sites - it is a certitude, here - and nuclear missiles, will be quiet. North Korea will look at the US ops and will laugh


    Of course, I exaggerate. You understand it.

    But i did this exaggeration to show you one thing :
    USA atacked Iraq, and now want to attack Iran. But what about the N-Korea, the most dangerous country - COUNTRY, this term has importance - for USA.
    So, why attack second-danger country and leave alone and quiet the big evil ?
     
  3. Annie
    Offline

    Annie Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2003
    Messages:
    50,847
    Thanks Received:
    4,644
    Trophy Points:
    1,790
    Ratings:
    +4,770
    Because France has our back?
     
  4. padisha emperor
    Offline

    padisha emperor Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,564
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Aix-en-Provence, France
    Ratings:
    +53
    ?? sorry, what does it mean ?

    Nevermind.
    Why, when I post a message about USA, do you always refer to France ?

    Look : My question : Why, instead of making war against all the arabian wolrd, the USA not attack the real danger, N-Korea ?
    Why USA attack all the poor countries who have certainly not nuke sites - like Iraq - instead of strinking a hostile country who who has nuke sites ?

    This is my question.
    I never said the word "France" or "french".
    So Kathianne, why do you always speak of France ?
    Here, it is about the USA, the Arabian world - the target - and NK
     
  5. Comrade
    Offline

    Comrade Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    Ratings:
    +167
    After the election.


    Oh surely not. They get it, and after Iran they won't give us an excuse.

    Well 10 minutes after they do we'll see it tested in Tel-Aviv. But that ridiculous.

    Look, you live by nonviolence, and if we attack anyone it aggravates the situation. But NK is laughing at YOU, not Bush. You're ideas got him time to cheat and make nukes. And Iran is getting away with screwing the EU and only now the US is getting serious. And I bet the leading Clerics are definately not laughing. Is Saddam laughing?

    What about it? First you had China and the Communist who let this tyrant and his son rule since the 50's. Then you got Seoul and our S.K. allies who would die by millions if we had caused a war since then, nuclear or not. It's pretty much the attitude from Europe about Iran which emulates how N.K. developed nukes. So first of all it's too late for N.K. While Europe goes about building reactors for Iran we're the ones facing a decision to keep them from making nukes, and it's our asses and not France there to back it up. It's also ONLY the US who stands guard in South Korea. If the Europeans don't send troops who are they to even protest US policy in our defence of our democratic allies?

    It's not anyone from the EU who will put their ass on the line for making sure Iran's Mullahs don't get nukes, it will be the US and few allies.

    For the same reasons we didn't attack the Soviet Union.
     
  6. Comrade
    Offline

    Comrade Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    1,873
    Thanks Received:
    167
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Seattle, WA.
    Ratings:
    +167
    You can really answer a loaded question like this. Why wasn't Afganistan after 9-11 the logical place to address a real danger we could stop while it could be stopped?

    You don't just go attacking North Korea for no good reason other than let Seoul burn.
     
  7. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    What difference does it really make to you dish?---You are just gonna be a spectator for whatever happens. If ya don't contribute ,you don't get to pick and choose our foreign policy for us.
     
  8. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    it will be a messy, sticky situation for all hands involved. we need better options but they are not available. so a military strike may very well be the best option in the end.
     
  9. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    I'd rather be shot than picked to death by greedy buzzards
     
  10. padisha emperor
    Offline

    padisha emperor Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2004
    Messages:
    1,564
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Aix-en-Provence, France
    Ratings:
    +53
    you're close-minded.
    For you, a spectator can not give his opinion, his advice ?

    You know, people can always give their opinion. It is called : liberty of expression.
    Even - above all in fact - if they disagree with you.


    where ? in Iran ?
    first, sent UN inspectors. or civilian inspectors.
    Because, it won't be good for US it they attack a country without nuke sites. Whatever, it would be bad for US, but if they can minimize the bad reputation, it would be best for them.
     

Share This Page