Words to my fellow Democrat, Progressive, Liberals and Elites

Actually I'm not liberal. Nice try though :lol:

Sure you're not. :eusa_liar:

Then why are you getting your panties is a knot over CrusaderFrank's suggestion to liberals, progressives, etc?

I'm pro-life, pro-death penalty, pro-fair (flat) tax, voted for Crist for governor (GOP) and senator (IND), and voted GOP for House, off the top of my head-so no I don't think those things make me a liberal now do they? Actually the only Dem I've voted for is Obama, and I almost voted Mccain (Palin drove me away).

Look at my other posts here-where I've clearly said the conservatives had absolutely ZERO to do with the Tucson shootings, or where I've stated I'm against amnesty for illegals, or where I said Socialism isn't practical, or where I said we need to severely cut back on government handouts. I think it's fair to say based on all of that-I'm not a liberal, and for the record only a fool believes 100% with any particular system.

I never argued anything CrusaderFrank said where did I say anything towards him? Point that out for me. You wont be able to do so-you made that up (aka-lied). I merely pointed out an inconsistency with your post. You just over-reacted and made up things that I said in your head. That or you're really clawing as to not look like you've been caught assuming.

Maybe in your world if somebody doesn't agree with one point somebody made (which I never made on this thread), that means they're the total opposite and automatically something-but that's not reality. Grow up.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

As for your "grow up" line. Work on your material.

It's not the timing. That's bad.

But the material is very very stale.

And when you declare that my derisive mocking of uber-libs is "hate filled rhetoric," you qualify as a lib. Disrespect is not the same as hate. For example, I harbor no particular respect for you so far, but I don't hate you. Get it yet? You even said that the crap spewed by Dumb As Coal was hateful. It wasn't. It was merely ignorant. There's another difference for ya!

But congrats, at least, for claiming to have some conservative credentials. I'm going to pretend to be impressed, now. Ready?

:clap2: Bravo! :clap2:

There ya go. Enjoy.
 
Progressives in both of the so-called political parties are coming for you...whatch'a gonna do????

Main lines of attack against our freedom and finances...

The Second Amendment:

A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.

The original intent and purpose of the Second Amendment was to preserve and guarantee, not grant, the pre-existing right of individuals to keep and bear arms. Although the amendment emphasizes the need for a militia, membership in any militia, let alone a well-regulated one, was not intended to serve as a prerequisite for exercising the right to keep arms.

The Second Amendment preserves and guarantees an individual right for a collective purpose. That does not transform the right into a "collective right." The militia clause was a declaration of purpose, and preserving the people's right to keep and bear arms was the method the framers chose to, in-part, ensure the continuation of a well-regulated militia.

Read more: GunCite-Second Amendment-Original intent and purpose of the Second Amendment
GUN OWNERSHIP: A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT

THE SECOND AMENDMENT

The Library's a Strong Supporter of Gun Control, meaning: The Ability to Hit What you're Aiming At.

Besides, if Guns are Outlawed How can we Shoot the Liberals... and Conservatives?

Certainly one of the chief guarantees of freedom under any government, no matter how popular and respected, is the right of citizens to keep and bear arms.... The right of citizens to bear arms is just one guarantee against arbitrary government, one more safeguard against tyranny... - Hubert Humphrey, liberal

Banning guns addresses a fundamental right of all Americans to feel safe. - Dianne Feinstein, liberal hypocrite

ACLU Policy #47: Gun Control

The Second Amendment: The Framers' Intentions

Mack v. U.S., 9th Circuit Rules Brady Handgun Control Act Constitutional

No man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. - Thomas Jefferson

I like automatic weapons. I fought for my right to use them in Vietnam. - Oliver Stone

It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law. - Malcolm X

Arms, like laws, discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe and preserve order... - Thomas Paine

Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself. They are the American people's liberty teeth and keystone under independence. The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evil interference. - George Washington

We're going to hammer guns on the anvil of relentless legislative strategy.
We're going to beat guns into submission! - Sen. Charles Schumer

Constitutional Law & Rights Topic Area

http://jpfo.org/images03/handbill-2a-soldier-b.jpg

http://jpfo.org/images03/handbill-2a-cop.jpg

Will the ‘Ruling Class Right’ Rescue Vulnerable Dems? - Big Government

POLICE STATE BILL...

The McCain-Lieberman Police State Act | Fog City Journal

Police State legislation, S.3081 introduced by McCain and Scott Brown Conservative Libertarian Outpost

Agenda 21 Part I: A Global Economic Disaster in the Making - Big Government

WARNING: THE FOLLOWING PRESENTATION IS
CONTROVERSIAL AND MAY BE OFFENSIVE TO SOME AUDIENCES.
Viewer discretion is advised.

Stansberry's Investment Advisory

So why the negs?
 
Sure you're not. :eusa_liar:

Then why are you getting your panties is a knot over CrusaderFrank's suggestion to liberals, progressives, etc?

I'm pro-life, pro-death penalty, pro-fair (flat) tax, voted for Crist for governor (GOP) and senator (IND), and voted GOP for House, off the top of my head-so no I don't think those things make me a liberal now do they? Actually the only Dem I've voted for is Obama, and I almost voted Mccain (Palin drove me away).

Look at my other posts here-where I've clearly said the conservatives had absolutely ZERO to do with the Tucson shootings, or where I've stated I'm against amnesty for illegals, or where I said Socialism isn't practical, or where I said we need to severely cut back on government handouts. I think it's fair to say based on all of that-I'm not a liberal, and for the record only a fool believes 100% with any particular system.

I never argued anything CrusaderFrank said where did I say anything towards him? Point that out for me. You wont be able to do so-you made that up (aka-lied). I merely pointed out an inconsistency with your post. You just over-reacted and made up things that I said in your head. That or you're really clawing as to not look like you've been caught assuming.

Maybe in your world if somebody doesn't agree with one point somebody made (which I never made on this thread), that means they're the total opposite and automatically something-but that's not reality. Grow up.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much.

As for your "grow up" line. Work on your material.

It's not the timing. That's bad.

But the material is very very stale.

And when you declare that my derisive mocking of uber-libs is "hate filled rhetoric," you qualify as a lib.
Disrespect is not the same as hate. For example, I harbor no particular respect for you so far, but I don't hate you. Get it yet? You even said that the crap spewed by Dumb As Coal was hateful. It wasn't. It was merely ignorant. There's another difference for ya!

But congrats, at least, for claiming to have some conservative credentials. I'm going to pretend to be impressed, now. Ready?

:clap2: Bravo! :clap2:

There ya go. Enjoy.

I also classify liberals using "derisive mocking of uber-cons" as "hate filled rhetoric". Based upon your logic you'd consider me to be a conservative? Hm so I can't be both now can I?

Again you rely on labeling people with a blanket term. Your attempts at resolving your cognitive dissonance are actually very sad I must say.

But hey at least you have the balls to reply to posts where you're only making yourself look sillier and sillier. I'm going to pretend to be impressed, now. Ready?

:clap2: Bravo! :clap2:

There ya go. Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
To demonstrate the serious differences between progressive subversives out to destroy us and them who believe in the Constitutional blessings of freedom inherent in our Republic wherein majority is supposed to rule through representation....

2011 The Collapse of America

http://geraldcelentechannel.blogspot.com/2011/01/2011-collapse-of-america.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=i3pNHvTgN-4&vq=medium#t=886

Constitution Impossible To Understand Because it is Over 100 Years Old

Progressives out to destroy us and the Republic...

http://venturacountyteaparty.ning.com/video/constitution-impossible-to
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top