Discussion in 'Military' started by Manonthestreet, Jun 13, 2014.
I'm getting the feeling you don't know a lot of women.
It's clear that democrats have little respect for (genetic) women. Successful women like Sara Palin who went from a hockey mom to the governor of Alaska is the subject of jeers and insults from democrats. Maybe it's not surprising that democrat politicians think they are doing women a favor by ordering them into combat roles that they aren't psychologically or physically suited for. What's the point? Are we so short of Military personnel that we have to use women? When was the last time the mainstream media did a story about the pregnancy rate on U.S. warships? They spike the story before Americans became aware of the issue. Is the short haired hormone injected lesbian lobby so strong that politicians put women in harms way to avoid criticism?
Women in combat is a good idea. The amazons were the most efficient killers because every man was bedezeled by their beauty and curves, so couldn't fight them. On the other hand, if you want to terminate an enemy, it is its women that you need to kill, because women are the ones for continuation. I support women in combat. It also increments women's self esteem. Check how many fat Israeli women exist versus how many fat American women exist.
You should meet my daughter, a 2LT, US Army - 3rd Cavalry. I don't think there is anything that she is scared of other than wasps!
I'm thinking he watches too much TV.
Yes, I'm rattling but what do I do when I'm PMSing!!! I need to be unleashed on the enemy!!!
Hey, men get emotional tooooo.
Not like just before Aunt Flo comes to visit.
No we don't!
Yeah, unleash one on the enemy and see them running scare.
Separate names with a comma.