Vastator
Platinum Member
- Oct 14, 2014
- 22,118
- 9,682
- 950
You have neither substantiated your assertion that the child is best protected, by helping the father avoid financial responsibility at the cost of another man. Nor have you shown the merit of punish one person, for the actions of another...Precisely. The assumption made in good faith; was in fact made in error. That error allowed the actual father to avoid responsibility. Thatās why it is incumbent upon a legally just system to correct errors, as they are made known. But youre unprincipled. You keep contradicting yourself throughout this thread. Thatās the cost of lacking principles...
Nope. The principle is to protect children. If this guy was too stupid to realize that his wife was stepping out on him because of his inadequacies as a man, that's on him.