Woman protects her children, shoots intruder

Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

And when the intruder still has an assault weapon and you're out-armed because he didn't follow that law?

But if we ban these weapons, criminals won't be able to get them. Works in Mexico. Okay not Mexico, but it worked in Norway, right? Okay, not Norway either. Well, it certainly worked when banned them in America for 10 years, didn't it? Criminals didn't have them in the US between '94 and '04 and there were no mass killings. Oh wait, that's not the case either. Hmm. Well, certainly if we took all the guns, that would work. After all, the virtual ban on civilian firearm ownership meant less violent crime in the UK, right? Not the case either eh? Well, what about Australia? What happened to violent crime rates after their ban? It went up? Oh shit...this is hard.

Okay, I got it. What if we force everyone to hold hands and sing Kumbaya? That'll do the trick!

When we banned alcohol, that worked. Wait...

When we banned drugs, that worked. Wait...

When we banned prostitution, that worked. Wait...

There's gotta be SOMETHING we've banned that stayed scarce.. :eusa_think:
 
And when the intruder still has an assault weapon and you're out-armed because he didn't follow that law?

But if we ban these weapons, criminals won't be able to get them. Works in Mexico. Okay not Mexico, but it worked in Norway, right? Okay, not Norway either. Well, it certainly worked when banned them in America for 10 years, didn't it? Criminals didn't have them in the US between '94 and '04 and there were no mass killings. Oh wait, that's not the case either. Hmm. Well, certainly if we took all the guns, that would work. After all, the virtual ban on civilian firearm ownership meant less violent crime in the UK, right? Not the case either eh? Well, what about Australia? What happened to violent crime rates after their ban? It went up? Oh shit...this is hard.

Okay, I got it. What if we force everyone to hold hands and sing Kumbaya? That'll do the trick!

When we banned alcohol, that worked. Wait...

When we banned drugs, that worked. Wait...

When we banned prostitution, that worked. Wait...

There's gotta be SOMETHING we've banned that stayed scarce.. :eusa_think:

Porn?
 
But if we ban these weapons, criminals won't be able to get them. Works in Mexico. Okay not Mexico, but it worked in Norway, right? Okay, not Norway either. Well, it certainly worked when banned them in America for 10 years, didn't it? Criminals didn't have them in the US between '94 and '04 and there were no mass killings. Oh wait, that's not the case either. Hmm. Well, certainly if we took all the guns, that would work. After all, the virtual ban on civilian firearm ownership meant less violent crime in the UK, right? Not the case either eh? Well, what about Australia? What happened to violent crime rates after their ban? It went up? Oh shit...this is hard.

Okay, I got it. What if we force everyone to hold hands and sing Kumbaya? That'll do the trick!

When we banned alcohol, that worked. Wait...

When we banned drugs, that worked. Wait...

When we banned prostitution, that worked. Wait...

There's gotta be SOMETHING we've banned that stayed scarce.. :eusa_think:

Porn?

All the assault weapons in the world pointed at me couldn't ban me from porn :D
 
I'd be tempted to overkill a fucker who busted into my home and chased me and my children down to a closet.

I'd overkill the shit out of him.

Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

Why do you care what law-abiding citizens use to protect and defend themselves and their families?
 
I'd be tempted to overkill a fucker who busted into my home and chased me and my children down to a closet.

I'd overkill the shit out of him.

Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

Why do you care what law-abiding citizens use to protect and defend themselves and their families?

You don't need assault weapons to protect yourself. You might need one if you were planning a mass shooting though.

A regular old gun will protect you.

I want them banned and a lot of others do too.
 
I'd be tempted to overkill a fucker who busted into my home and chased me and my children down to a closet.

I'd overkill the shit out of him.

Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

And when the intruder still has an assault weapon and you're out-armed because he didn't follow that law?

Intruders? They don't usually carry assault weapons with 30 round magazines.
 
I'd be tempted to overkill a fucker who busted into my home and chased me and my children down to a closet.

I'd overkill the shit out of him.

Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

I'm guessing you don't even know what an assault weapon is. Care to enlighten us with specificity? Then please tell us exactly what is needed and what will be adequate to stop armed criminals that don't give a crap about regulations.

The floor is yours.

Floor is still yours....
 
Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

And when the intruder still has an assault weapon and you're out-armed because he didn't follow that law?

Intruders? They don't usually carry assault weapons with 30 round magazines.

Usually? No. Sometimes? Yes.

More common would be a 9mm handgun with 16 rounds in it. I faced two intruders years ago. Both had those firearms in tow. THANK GOD I had superior firepower (a Ruger mini 14 in .223 with a large capacity magazine). I'm convinced no one died that day because I had, and knew how to use, that weapon...a firearm you would seek to ban.

But hey, I'm sure you know what's best for everyone else...:doubt:
 
Point being, you don't need an assault weapon to stop an intruder in your home. Anti gun control is the point of this thread and many others, no?

The assault weapons ban is something I'd support. Many other rational beings do as well, even Repubs.

Why do you care what law-abiding citizens use to protect and defend themselves and their families?

You don't need assault weapons to protect yourself. You might need one if you were planning a mass shooting though.

A regular old gun will protect you.

Not if the bad guys have superior firepower, which your bans will ensure. Logical disconnect there honey.
 
She apparently thinks women shouldn't have access to firearms that could actually disable or kill an attacker.

She doesn't want attacks stopped, it sounds like.

I think it is also important to prevent the attacker from entering your home. Have an alarm system, keep doors locked, windows closed and locked at night etc.

You only need to use that weapon when the intruder enters your house, if he/she is outside and you are inside, you are not in danger.
 
She apparently thinks women shouldn't have access to firearms that could actually disable or kill an attacker.

She doesn't want attacks stopped, it sounds like.

I think it is also important to prevent the attacker from entering your home. Have an alarm system, keep doors locked, windows closed and locked at night etc.

You only need to use that weapon when the intruder enters your house, if he/she is outside and you are inside, you are not in danger.

In this case, he used a crowbar to pry the door open.

What's truly FUNNY, as in it made me laugh out loud, is that the news report I just heard of this burglar had tried to rob another house a few streets away and was chased off by an armed homeowner.

Maybe this time he learned his lesson.
 
She apparently thinks women shouldn't have access to firearms that could actually disable or kill an attacker.

She doesn't want attacks stopped, it sounds like.

I think it is also important to prevent the attacker from entering your home. Have an alarm system, keep doors locked, windows closed and locked at night etc.

You only need to use that weapon when the intruder enters your house, if he/she is outside and you are inside, you are not in danger.

In this case, he used a crowbar to pry the door open.

What's truly FUNNY, as in it made me laugh out loud, is that the news report I just heard of this burglar had tried to rob another house a few streets away and was chased off by an armed homeowner.

Maybe this time he learned his lesson.

Some people never learn. I imagine he has learned his lesson now, though.
 

Forum List

Back
Top