Woman At VP Debate Calls Obama A Communist

If you read his book you would see his father and Obama grandparents believe the communist ways.. Frank Marshal his mentor a communist.. If it walks and talks like a duck. Guess what your a duck.. Obama wants to get this election and if he does you wont recognize America after he gets done with him
 
Woman at VP debate calls Obama a communist, gets confronted by Chris Matthews and can't explain what a communist is

:lmao:


Woman At VP Debate Calls Obama A Communist - YouTube

com·mu·nist
   [kom-yuh-nist] Show IPA
noun
1.
( initial capital letter ) a member of the Communist party or movement.
2.
an advocate of communism.
3.
a person who is regarded as supporting politically leftist or subversive causes.

4.
( usually initial capital letter ) a Communard.

com·mu·nism
   [kom-yuh-niz-uhm] Show IPA
noun
1.
a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
2.
( often initial capital letter ) a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.

3.
( initial capital letter ) the principles and practices of the Communist party.
4.
communalism.


sure he doesn't have a touch in him?
 
Listen, the GOP faces a tremendous challenge.

How do they get the poor to support policies that overwhelmingly benefit the wealthy elite who fund elections and staff government?

Answer: they need to convince stupid morons that the problem is communists not unregulated derivatives, and 30 years of companies like Bain Capital helping large corporations ship jobs to China.

The Right has gotten good at this. Reagan made us worry about a dying Soviet Union when he should have been worried about the energy problem. Instead, we spent 30 years under the delusion that petroleum would never go away. Now economic growth is being crippled by high gas costs . . . but nobody talks about it . . . because Washington is owned by big oil.

Same thing with Bush. He got us to worry about a petty middle eastern dictator when the real nuclear bomb was a housing bubble which destroyed the economy long term.

This is what Republicans do.

The inflate National Security threats in order to cover up terrible policies that benefit a tiny slice of the population.

Watch how fast Romney pivots to the "War on Terrorism".

Republicans can't govern without a Big Enemy. This is how they mobilize poor people. This is what they have always done.
 
Last edited:
Woman at VP debate calls Obama a communist, gets confronted by Chris Matthews and can't explain what a communist is

The woman should have ask Mr Matthews to explain it since it seem to be his political leaning too.
 
It's obvious that anyone that calls this president a Communist has no idea what the term means. Same thing goes for the morons that call him a Marxist, a Nazi or even a closet Socialist.
 
Since you are so well versed on the subject tell us which kind of communist is Obama? Is he a Trotskyite, Stalinist, Leninist, Maoists? Inquiring minds want to know. BTW is your name Richard Cranium?

Does it really matter? But to answer your question he's of the American progressive variety. One who believes in slow incrimental movements towards communism. Evolution instead of revolution.
There is no such thing as "the American progressive variety of communism." And your reference to "slow incremental movements toward communism," etc., is an empty notion designed to afford wiggle room when challenged.
Ignorant or lying?...You decide.

Fabian Society - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The fact is Obama has clearly and brazenly served the interests of the most aggressive capitalists in history to the point where he could be accused of collusion with the most devious of the lot. He had an opportunity to prosecute the Wall Street monarchy and take a giant step in the direction of federal control of the economy (a central committee) but he moved in the diametrically opposite direction.

Obama is a compliant capitalist with some degree of expedient socialist inclination -- which is what that woman probably has mistaken for communism but cannot explain her confused perception.
One of the identifying elements of communism is its acting like a protection racket, favoring the large business operators over the small.

Robert-Minor-Dee-Lighted-1911.png
 
Remember the lady that called Obama a Muslim at the McCain event? She did not make republicans look that bright, downright stupid in fact, this is the same kind of thing, quit trying to make stupid look like smart.

After four years of Obama Its "Barry we know yee. We know yee well."
The Chicago Jesus is a Communist through and through.
I'd even venture to say its been bred into his genes much like the pitbull, when trained and coached properly to maximize the breed's inherent 'Dog/Dog Agrresion" became the dogfighter's animal of choice, some people are genetically predisposed to thinking and feeling that the world owes them a living.
His maternal grandparents were Communists, his mother and father were Communists. He was given over to a Communist for indoctrination in Communist lore and theory at a tender age. He matured with an "Everybody owes me a living" philosophy for many years in the "Choomwagon". He admitted he sought out the campus Communists at college to pal around with. His WhiteHouse consigliere is the daughter in law of a member of the Old Chicago Communist School. His campaign manager was mentored by another member of the Old Chicago Communist school. His picks of Anita Dunne, Cass Sunstein, and Van Jones for WhiteHouse positions were based on their avowed Communist leanings.
His known fondness for wealth redistribution and his predilection to consider Government as the ultimate source of all wealth are more tips of Communist iceberg that is Barack Obama.
He was already plotting his Communist overthrow of the United States Constitution back in 1998 at Loyola University when he uttered his infamous "The people on welfare or receiving some form of Government largesse constitute a critical mass that if manipulated properly could lead to the installation of a Communist at the head of Government and maintain him there for a considerable time" only he was too smart to say Communist because he knew that if he misspoke and said 'Communist' instead of Liberal, he would have politically achieved the same state as a piece of Mastodon meat instantaneously. Later that same day 'Bam railed against the american peoples inherent mistrust of Government.
"If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, its a duck my friend"
 
Last edited:
He is a communist. His parents were communist. His grandparents were communist. His mentor was a hard core communist. He admits that when in school he sought out the communist and marxist professors. He sat in a communist influenced Church for several decades. He appoints communists to places of prominence in his administration. At no point in his life has he ever articulated a time he turned away from communist thought. In fact, he wrote a book about the dreams he recieved from His father. His father's dream was communism!

He is merely a progressive and not a revolutationary communist. So he sets things up incrementally.

Nuh-uh !
 
This is the Marxist tenet of Obama's belief in a redistribution system:

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0PUUpa5X4E"]Barack Obama "I Believe in Redistribution of Wealth" Comment Loyola University 1998! - YouTube[/ame]

Obama's dumbed down version of Redistribution of wealth as being for the poor, when actually, he is giving billions to supporters through Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, not to mention DNC wealthy relatives of theirs. :blahblah: And the lie he tells with the huge magnanimous smile -- it's all barf!:

[ame="http://youtu.be/TB1dG1Bg1xM"]Longer Version: Obama Calls Wealth Distribution 'Neighborly' - YouTube[/ame]

What a ""pleasant"" toady who hates free enterprise. What kind of acting lessons went into the biggest bullshit lie in American history? It's all theater! And it's all endorsed by Hillary Clinton who is about to come out and play like she's throwing Obama under the bus without destroying her own Alinsky method rise to total power. (Her college thesis was nothing less than a full-blown Alinsky-worshiping manifesto).

This is what an observer has to say about that belief system:

[ame="http://youtu.be/9moIXppg-C8"]http://youtu.be/9moIXppg-C8[/ame]
 
This is the Marxist tenet of Obama's belief in a redistribution system:

Barack Obama "I Believe in Redistribution of Wealth" Comment Loyola University 1998! - YouTube

Obama's dumbed down version of Redistribution of wealth as being for the poor, when actually, he is giving billions to supporters through Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, not to mention DNC wealthy relatives of theirs. :blahblah: And the lie he tells with the huge magnanimous smile -- it's all barf!:

Longer Version: Obama Calls Wealth Distribution 'Neighborly' - YouTube

What a ""pleasant"" toady who hates free enterprise. What kind of acting lessons went into the biggest bullshit lie in American history? It's all theater! And it's all endorsed by Hillary Clinton who is about to come out and play like she's throwing Obama under the bus without destroying her own Alinsky method rise to total power. (Her college thesis was nothing less than a full-blown Alinsky-worshiping manifesto).

This is what an observer has to say about that belief system:

http://youtu.be/9moIXppg-C8

Redistibution is a dirty word to some. But government has always taxed and levied fees to pay for projects. When your city takes a tax from you to fix a pothole across town - that's redistribution.

Now that pothole might be in a poor part of town - they might not have been able to repair it on their own - but they live in the same town you do - it's their town, too.

You might have taken note of Obama leaving out "under God" from the Gettysburg address (I don't know who did or didn't - I can't remember usernames quite yet.)

But would the complainers been so vocal had he left out, "oF the people, by the people, and for the people?"

I think not. The complainers of redistribution are one and the same.

But they forget we are all in this together.
 
Last edited:
Woman at VP debate calls Obama a communist, gets confronted by Chris Matthews and can't explain what a communist is

:lmao:


Woman At VP Debate Calls Obama A Communist - YouTube

Gee, and I thought all these nuts believed President Obama was an Arab.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MpE6ljPjSAk]Barack Obama is an Arab? "Keep 'em scared my friends!" The new McCain/Palin slogan - YouTube[/ame]
 
She's living in it and she knows she doesn't like it. She doesn't have to articulate its structure and its nuances any more than a person having a heart attack has to elucidate the pathology of why he's feeling the way he is. They know the f#@king situation they're currently finding themselves in ain't good. You prigs just keep enjoying your field day because some poor person can't fully describe the situation they're in. After having built and sold houses to Cubans who fled Castro's Cuba and to Hungarian and Czech refugees from Communism, I've seen that if you even casually mention Comrade Obama to them, they instantly and reflexively spit on the floor at the mention of his name. They know what Communism feels like because they've lived under it and they know Comrade Barack is bringing exactly what they fled from to this country, here.
 
Redistibution is a dirty word to some. But government has always taxed and levied fees to pay for projects. When your city takes a tax from you to fix a pothole across town - that's redistribution.

Now that pothole might be in a poor part of town - they might not have been able to repair it on their own - but they live in the same town you do - it's their town, too.

You might have taken note of Obama leaving out "under God" from the Gettysburg address (I don't know who did or didn't - I can't remember usernames quite yet.)

But would the complainers been so vocal had he left out, "oF the people, by the people, and for the people?"

I think not. The complainers of redistribution are one and the same.

But they forget we are all in this together.

Redistribution is actually the sanitary word for what it truly is. Robbery.

Stop trying to justify your robbery. Your selfishness is destroying real lives.
 
The mainstream media is nothing short of a sideshow. Nothing but lies and slight of hand. No doubt this was a plant, no different than the 'volunteers' in a circus sideshow who are plants and know the slight of hand routine before the show ever starts. And like the woman in the Siegfried and Roy show who was oblivious to the tiger just above her left ear.
 
This is the Marxist tenet of Obama's belief in a redistribution system:

Barack Obama "I Believe in Redistribution of Wealth" Comment Loyola University 1998! - YouTube

Obama's dumbed down version of Redistribution of wealth as being for the poor, when actually, he is giving billions to supporters through Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, not to mention DNC wealthy relatives of theirs. :blahblah: And the lie he tells with the huge magnanimous smile -- it's all barf!:

Longer Version: Obama Calls Wealth Distribution 'Neighborly' - YouTube

What a ""pleasant"" toady who hates free enterprise. What kind of acting lessons went into the biggest bullshit lie in American history? It's all theater! And it's all endorsed by Hillary Clinton who is about to come out and play like she's throwing Obama under the bus without destroying her own Alinsky method rise to total power. (Her college thesis was nothing less than a full-blown Alinsky-worshiping manifesto).

This is what an observer has to say about that belief system:

http://youtu.be/9moIXppg-C8

Redistibution is a dirty word to some. But government has always taxed and levied fees to pay for projects. When your city takes a tax from you to fix a pothole across town - that's redistribution.

Now that pothole might be in a poor part of town - they might not have been able to repair it on their own - but they live in the same town you do - it's their town, too.

You might have taken note of Obama leaving out "under God" from the Gettysburg address (I don't know who did or didn't - I can't remember usernames quite yet.)

But would the complainers been so vocal had he left out, "oF the people, by the people, and for the people?"

I think not. The complainers of redistribution are one and the same.

But they forget we are all in this together.

It the "we" that is a big issue.

If my city wants to redistribute wealth, I am better off with that than if Obama wants to.

I can keep a closer watch on it, yell at the mayor in person etc. etc.

But somehow the left needs the we to be all 320,000,000 of us. When the constitution was written there were 6,000,000 and they still wanted the government decentralized.

Oh, and I'd like Chris Matthews to confront me in person. That would be a dream come true.
 
This is the Marxist tenet of Obama's belief in a redistribution system:

Barack Obama "I Believe in Redistribution of Wealth" Comment Loyola University 1998! - YouTube

Obama's dumbed down version of Redistribution of wealth as being for the poor, when actually, he is giving billions to supporters through Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, not to mention DNC wealthy relatives of theirs. :blahblah: And the lie he tells with the huge magnanimous smile -- it's all barf!:

Longer Version: Obama Calls Wealth Distribution 'Neighborly' - YouTube

What a ""pleasant"" toady who hates free enterprise. What kind of acting lessons went into the biggest bullshit lie in American history? It's all theater! And it's all endorsed by Hillary Clinton who is about to come out and play like she's throwing Obama under the bus without destroying her own Alinsky method rise to total power. (Her college thesis was nothing less than a full-blown Alinsky-worshiping manifesto).

This is what an observer has to say about that belief system:

http://youtu.be/9moIXppg-C8

Redistibution is a dirty word to some. But government has always taxed and levied fees to pay for projects. When your city takes a tax from you to fix a pothole across town - that's redistribution.

Now that pothole might be in a poor part of town - they might not have been able to repair it on their own - but they live in the same town you do - it's their town, too.

You might have taken note of Obama leaving out "under God" from the Gettysburg address (I don't know who did or didn't - I can't remember usernames quite yet.)

But would the complainers been so vocal had he left out, "oF the people, by the people, and for the people?"

I think not. The complainers of redistribution are one and the same.

But they forget we are all in this together.

It the "we" that is a big issue.

If my city wants to redistribute wealth, I am better off with that than if Obama wants to.

I can keep a closer watch on it, yell at the mayor in person etc. etc.

But somehow the left needs the we to be all 320,000,000 of us. When the constitution was written there were 6,000,000 and they still wanted the government decentralized.

Oh, and I'd like Chris Matthews to confront me in person. That would be a dream come true.

He seems to have picked up his statist ideas from that dreaded radical he learned of in the madrasah, Abraham Lincoln.
 
You might have taken note of Obama leaving out "under God" from the Gettysburg address (I don't know who did or didn't - I can't remember usernames quite yet.)

rw's are just incredible.

Obama did not leave out "under god" but, once the rw's say it, it becomes fact cuz why tell the truth if it doesn't serve your wacko agenda.
 

Forum List

Back
Top