WMD's and "Golden Boy" "There are no WMD's" John Kerry

[CnsrvtveChrstn]

www.rnc.org/news/read.aspx?ID=3912

Enough said.

 

[kcmcdonald]

didn't you post this somewhere else?

 

[DirtyTreeHugger]

Did you just back up your arguement against John Kerry with a PAGE FROM THE RNC website? Dontcha think that there might be something of a....hmmm...I dunno...CONSERVATIVE bias?

I know the position on WMDs has changed significantly over the past decade, but is it reasonable to characterize Kerry as a leprous idiot because he simply points out the fact that the administration and its faculties have yet to detect weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? If we had "Bulletproof Evidence" before the war, then why can't we find any "Actual Material" now? Where did it go? Before we launch an attack on John F. Kerry, perhaps we might want to question our own President about why he deployed huge amounts of national defense forces, committed $87 Billion to another country when it just as easily could have provided quality healthcare at home (one of the Presidents' campaign promises) and lost all of our friends in the international community without a clear and present danger to the safety of the United States of America.

 

[lilcountriegal]

but is it reasonable to characterize Kerry as a leprous idiot because he simply points out the fact that the administration and its faculties have yet to detect weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?

No. It is reasonable to characterize Kerry as a leprous idiot because that's what he is. No other reason needed.

As far as the rest of your post, you better check Kerry's voting record. He voted for the war in Iraq as well. President Bush did nothing on his own, he had the backing of the government, which unfortunately includes Kerry.

 

[jimnyc]

Originally posted by DirtyTreeHugger
Did you just back up your arguement against John Kerry with a PAGE FROM THE RNC website? Dontcha think that there might be something of a....hmmm...I dunno...CONSERVATIVE bias?

Ok, how about you prove what is on that page wrong? After all, if it's biased and the data is wrong, it should be fairly easy for you to dispute. Can you do that? No, you can't. They are exact quotes from Kerry.

Next.

 

[CnsrvtveChrstn]

check the website, there are links to ACTUAL TV NEWS REPORTS with Kerry mouthing his lies. Check it and view them if you don't believe me.

 

[_dmp_]

Originally posted by lilcountriegal
No. It is reasonable to characterize Kerry as a leprous idiot because that's what he is. No other reason needed.

As far as the rest of your post, you better check Kerry's voting record. He voted for the war in Iraq as well. President Bush did nothing on his own, he had the backing of the government, which unfortunately includes Kerry.

 

[sealybobo]

Did you just back up your arguement against John Kerry with a PAGE FROM THE RNC website? Dontcha think that there might be something of a....hmmm...I dunno...CONSERVATIVE bias?

I know the position on WMDs has changed significantly over the past decade, but is it reasonable to characterize Kerry as a leprous idiot because he simply points out the fact that the administration and its faculties have yet to detect weapons of mass destruction in Iraq? If we had "Bulletproof Evidence" before the war, then why can't we find any "Actual Material" now? Where did it go? Before we launch an attack on John F. Kerry, perhaps we might want to question our own President about why he deployed huge amounts of national defense forces, committed $87 Billion to another country when it just as easily could have provided quality healthcare at home (one of the Presidents' campaign promises) and lost all of our friends in the international community without a clear and present danger to the safety of the United States of America.

In a Republican presidential debate in South Carolina Donald Trump said something about the Bush administration and the Iraq War that is essentially illegal for Republican politicians.

“They lied,” he said. “They said there were weapons of mass destruction, there were none. And they knew there were none.”

Trump Is Doing the Same Thing on Iran That George W. Bush Did on Iraq

Last week, intelligence officials testified publicly that Iran has not resumed its efforts to acquire a nuclear weapon. The next day, President Trump calledthese officials “extremely passive and naive when it comes to the dangers of Iran,” and advised, “Perhaps Intelligence should go back to school!”

The first-blush response to this presidential outburst was to dump it in the same category as Trump’s other public eruption against members of his government who undercut his preferred narratives with inconvenient facts. That response is probably correct: this Trump tantrum is probably like all the other Trump tantrums. But there is another possible meaning to this episode: Trump’s rejection of intelligence assessments of Iran’s weapons of mass destruction capabilities eerily echoes the Bush administration’s rejection of Iraq’s WMD capabilities a decade and a half earlier.