WMD smoke and mirrors, fabricated reason for war.

DKSuddeth

Senior Member
Oct 20, 2003
5,175
61
48
North Texas
WMd's were a major reason for justification and it looks more and more like it was either fabricated or a serious breech of the intel apparatus. the article is very long so I've just provided the link and the first section.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tm...washpost/20040107/ts_washpost/a60340_2004jan6


BAGHDAD -- Of all Iraq's rocket scientists, none drew warier scrutiny abroad than Modher Sadeq-Saba Tamimi.

An engineering PhD known for outsized energy and gifts, Tamimi, 47, designed and built a new short-range missile during Iraq's four-year hiatus from United Nations arms inspections. Inspectors who returned in late 2002, enforcing Security Council limits, ruled that the Al Samoud missile's range was not quite short enough. The U.N. team crushed the missiles, bulldozed them into a pit and entombed the wreckage in concrete. In one of three interviews last month, Tamimi said "it was as if they were killing my sons."


But Tamimi had other brainchildren, and these stayed secret. Concealed at some remove from his Karama Co. factory here were concept drawings and computations for a family of much more capable missiles, designed to share parts and features with the openly declared Al Samoud. The largest was meant to fly six times as far.


"This was hidden during the UNMOVIC visits," Tamimi said, referring to inspectors from the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission. Over a leisurely meal of lamb and sweet tea, he sketched diagrams. "It was forbidden for us to reveal this information," he said.


Tamimi's covert work, which he recounted publicly for the first time in five hours of interviews, offers fresh perspective on the question that led the nation to war. Iraq flouted a legal duty to report the designs. The weapons they depicted, however, did not exist. After years of development -- against significant obstacles -- they might have taken form as nine-ton missiles. In March they fit in Tamimi's pocket, on two digital compact discs.


The nine-month record of arms investigators since the fall of Baghdad includes discoveries of other concealed arms research, most of it less advanced. Iraq's former government engaged in abundant deception about its ambitions and, in some cases, early steps to prepare for development or production. Interviews here -- among Iraqi weaponeers and investigators from the U.S. and British governments -- turned up unreported records, facilities or materials that could have been used in unlawful weapons.


But investigators have found no support for the two main fears expressed in London and Washington before the war: that Iraq had a hidden arsenal of old weapons and built advanced programs for new ones. In public statements and unauthorized interviews, investigators said they have discovered no work on former germ-warfare agents such as anthrax bacteria, and no work on a new designer pathogen -- combining pox virus and snake venom -- that led U.S. scientists on a highly classified hunt for several months. The investigators assess that Iraq did not, as charged in London and Washington, resume production of its most lethal nerve agent, VX, or learn to make it last longer in storage. And they have found the former nuclear weapons program, described as a "grave and gathering danger" by President Bush and a "mortal threat" by Vice President Cheney, in much the same shattered state left by U.N. inspectors in the 1990s.


A review of available evidence, including some not known to coalition investigators and some they have not made public, portrays a nonconventional arms establishment that was far less capable than U.S. analysts judged before the war. Leading figures in Iraqi science and industry, supported by observations on the ground, described factories and institutes that were thoroughly beaten down by 12 years of conflict, arms embargo and strangling economic sanctions. The remnants of Iraq's biological, chemical and missile infrastructures were riven by internal strife, bled by schemes for personal gain and handicapped by deceit up and down lines of command. The broad picture emerging from the investigation to date suggests that, whatever its desire, Iraq did not possess the wherewithal to build a forbidden armory on anything like the scale it had before the 1991 Persian Gulf War.


David Kay, who directs the weapons hunt on behalf of the Bush administration, reported no discoveries last year of finished weapons, bulk agents or ready-to-start production lines. Members of his Iraq Survey Group, in unauthorized interviews, said the group holds out little prospect now of such a find. Kay and his spokesman, who report to Director of Central Intelligence George J. Tenet, declined to be interviewed.
 
Hello all i am new to these boards, lots of interesting topics here.

Most of the WMD stuff has been beaten to death, but here's my two sense....

Feel free to correct me if i'm wrong, but i believe Iraq is roghly the size of california and Baghdad is roughly the size of LA and people keep saying we were lied to about WMD after a mere 11 months and other rants about how slow the rebuilding process is going.

If you take a look at history the first leader of Germany wasn't elected until at least 8 years after WWII. Hidden bunkers have been found as recently as the 90's (I will try to find sources). And people are upset that we haven't found anything a power has not been restored to the Iraqi people.

For those who still doubt the existence of WMD...just because they haven't been found doesn't mean they don't exist.

I'll make you a deal.... I'll take a fifty gallon drum, what i would assume you would store VX or mustard gas, and hide it in california and you get back to me when you find it.
 
Originally posted by Bern80


I'll make you a deal.... I'll take a fifty gallon drum, what i would assume you would store VX or mustard gas, and hide it in california and you get back to me when you find it.
Welcome to the board. Please, next time, warn me that I am going to fall off my couch laughing at your post! Your two cents is worth a million bucks....
 
I thought it was good.... thought of it all by myself too...i think i'm gonna make it my signature.

p.s. thanks for the welcome
 
A few problems with your arguement Bern. One is that in Germany we had the Marshall Plan, so everyone pretty much knew what was going on. So far the Bush administration has presented no plan whatsoever for the rebuilding of Iraq. Also, rebuilding Germany was a world-wide effort, Bush wants to rebuild Iraq with no help, costing American taxpayers billions, and ensuring huge profits for corporations like Halliburton. Iraq isn't anywhere near as developed as California, so finding WMDs should be easy, besides the Bush administration supposedly had intelligence as to where they were. As far as bunkers go, technology in 1945 wasn't close to what we have now. You can go to your local electronics store and buy a metal detector that will tell you what's underground. No digging necessary. Give me a couple thousand soldiers and some of those metal detectors and I'll find your drum. So far all we've managed to find in Iraq is a 1970s era plane.

acludem
 
1) there are just as many problems w/ your argument, acludem. If we had such a great plan in 1945 why did it take 8 years to accomplish.

2) Perhaps the reason you are under the assumption that there is no plan to rebuild Iraq is that our wonderful media has no desire to report the progress we are making in rebuilding the country, i.e. rebuilding power plants and schools and providing running water to areas that haven't had any of it.

3) I don't recall bush ever saying no other country may help us rebuild Iraq, but hey prove me wrong.

4) You make the typical liberal assumption that somehow making a profit is, in itself, wrong.

5)I live in Northern Minnesota and most of our 50 gallon drums are made out of plastic. Could u pick me up a plastic detector to please?

6) speaking of Northern MN you may or may not know that we've had a recent rash of student abductions in the last year, one at the school i attended. The most recent a girl that disappeard near the MN/ND border. The man who abducted hear was caught, but won't say where she is. They are fairly certain however that he didn't leave the state. "A couple thousand" national gaurdsman searched an areas probably a twentieth the size of CA and found nothing. Point being it is alot more difficult to find these things then you make it sound. Saddam was found in a hole in the ground. how many more thousand holes do you think there are to look in? Parts of Iraq are also rather mountainous, another ideal hiding spot.

6) Why do you assume that Saddam would't move his WMD's from the places our intelligence is "supposed" to be?
 
Hey Bern welcome to the board.
you ahve a good argument there. and its true. its a big ass desert over there. metal detectors done go down that far either. so i believe they are over there yet. we jsut cant find them yet
 
One is that in Germany we had the Marshall Plan, so everyone pretty much knew what was going on.

We sure did. Let's see... how many days was it that the Marshall Plan was announced after the end of the war?

How long has it been since the declared end of hostilities in Iraq?

Also, rebuilding Germany was a world-wide effort, Bush wants to rebuild Iraq with no help, costing American taxpayers billions, and ensuring huge profits for corporations like Halliburton.

We had help in rebuilding Germany, yes. Who paid the vast Lion's Share? Guess again if you think we didn't essentially rebuild Germany.

Bush wants to rebuild Iraq with no help? Are you sure? And he's doing it to ensure profits for Halliburton?

I'm sure you have excellent sources, where are they?

Iraq isn't anywhere near as developed as California, so finding WMDs should be easy,

LOL

besides the Bush administration supposedly had intelligence as to where they were.

Right. Those massive, untransportable parts, pieces and ingredients weren't where they were before the U.S. military came stomping their way up from the South after building up on the border for several months. [/sarcasm]

As far as bunkers go, technology in 1945 wasn't close to what we have now. You can go to your local electronics store and buy a metal detector that will tell you what's underground. No digging necessary. Give me a couple thousand soldiers and some of those metal detectors and I'll find your drum.

You obviously have no idea. Have you actually used a metal detector before? A knucklehead with a metal detector is NOT going to detect a bunker 100 + feet below the surface. Guaranteed.

You want to get a couple thousand Marines and give each of them a metal detector, have them stand shoulder-to-shoulder and start marching from border to border waving their detectors??? Are you serious?? :laugh:

So far all we've managed to find in Iraq is a 1970s era plane.

Are you referring to the MiG 25 Foxbats? Behold!


Tip of the iceberg?
This news item has strangely received very little mention in the mainstream press.


The Iraqi jet, an advanced Russian MiG-25 Foxbat, was found buried in the sand after an informant tipped off U.S. troops.

The MiG was dug out of a massive sand dune near the Al Taqqadum airfield by U.S. Air Force recovery teams. The MiG was reportedly one of over two dozen Iraqi jets buried in the sand, like hidden treasure, waiting to be recovered at a later date.

Contrary to what some in the major media have reported, not all the jets found were from the Gulf War era.

The recovery of the advanced MiG fighter is considered to be an intelligence coup by the U.S. Air Force. The Foxbat may also be equipped with advanced Russian- and French-made electronics that were sold to Iraq during the 1990s in violation of a U.N. ban on arms sales to Baghdad.

The buried aircraft at Al Taqqadum were covered in camouflage netting, sealed and, in many cases, had their wings removed before being buried more than 10 feet beneath the Iraqi desert.

The discovery of the buried Iraqi jet fighters illustrates the problem faced by U.S. inspection teams searching Iraq for weapons of mass destruction. Iraq is larger in size than California, and the massive deserts south and west of Baghdad were used by Saddam Hussein to hide weapons during the first Gulf war.

U.S. intelligence sources have already uncovered several mass grave burial sites in the open deserts with an estimated 10,000 dead hidden there. In addition, Iraq previously hid SCUD missiles, chemical weapons and biological warheads by burying them under the desert sand. U.N. inspection teams found the weapons in the early 1990s after detailed information of the exact locations was obtained.

While there are rumors of Iraqi chemical and biological weapons being shipped to nearby Syria, the weapons may very well still remain inside Iraq buried under the vast desert wastelands.

Some critics of the Bush administration have claimed that the inability of U.S. forces to uncover weapons of mass destruction is proof that the president misled the nation into the war with Iraq. However, in recent days the critics have fallen silent as word quietly leaked from Iraq that major discoveries have already been made and are now being documented completely. Bush administration officials are keeping any such discoveries secret for the moment.

Charles R. Smith
NewsMax
 
If there are weapons still in Iraq Bern, why this?

Weapons hunters pulled out of Iraq
By Douglas Jehl in Washington
January 9, 2004

The United States has quietly withdrawn from Iraq a 400-member military team whose job was to scour the country for weapons and military equipment, US officials said.

The step was described by some military officials as a sign that the US might have lowered its sights and no longer expects to uncover the caches of chemical and biological weapons the White House cited as a principal reason for going to war last March.

A separate military team that specialises in disposing of chemical and biological weapons remains part of the 1400-member Iraq Survey Group, which has been searching Iraq for more than seven months.

But that team is "still waiting for something to dispose of", a survey group member said.

Some US officials said the most important evidence from the weapons hunt might be contained in a vast collection of seized Iraqi documents being stored in a secret military warehouse in Qatar. Only a small fraction have been translated.

Senior intelligence officials acknowledged in recent days the weapons hunters still had not found weapons, but they said the search must continue to ensure that no hidden Iraqi weapons surfaced in a future attack.

"We worry about what may have happened to those weapons," said Stuart Cohen, vice-chairman of the National Intelligence Council.

"Theories abound as to what may have happened."

The search for Iraqi weapons remained "the primary focus" of the survey group, a Defence Department official said.

However, he acknowledged that most of the dozens of new linguists and intelligence analysts who joined the team recently had been given assignments related to combating the Iraqi insurgency rather than to the weapons search. David Kay, head of the survey group, made it known last month that he might leave his post.

The 400-member team withdrawn from Iraq, known as the Joint Captured Materiel Exploitation Group, was primarily composed of technical experts and was headed by an Australian brigadier, Defence Department officials said.

Its work included searching weapons depots and other sites for missile launchers that might have been used with illicit weapons. It was withdrawn "because its work was essentially done", an official said. "They picked up everything that was worth picking up."

A report due to have been released yesterday by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace has concluded that it was unlikely that Iraq could have destroyed, hidden or sent out of the country the hundreds of tonnes of chemical and biological weapons and related production facilities that US officials claimed were present "without the United States detecting some sign of this activity".

In an interim report in October, Mr Kay acknowledged that his team had failed to find illicit weapons or active weapons programs in Iraq, but said it had discovered evidence that the ousted Iraqi president, Saddam Hussein, planned to develop the weapons and might have retained the capacity to do so.

Mr Kay has not said when he intends to release his next report - that remains a subject of debate within the Bush Administration, officials said.

The New York Times


This story was found at: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/01/08/1073437414461.html



-Bam
 
Being new to these boards I have noticed many cases of people simply printing articles others have written w/ no explanation as to why they put them there, but generally it is to make a point of some kind.

Case in point above: What is you're point, bamthin? That no WMD have been found? That our government still thinks they exist? By pulling out these 400 odd men and women we are admitting WMD's never existed in the first place? Or was it to point out the finding of documents containing info on Saddam's weapon's program? Or that it appears once again that forces are only looking in the place the WMD's were "supposed" to be?

It would simply help if you stated the point you are trying to make by printing your article.

P.S. I do believe in the likliehood of WMD's still existing in Iraq and it wouldn't surprise me at all if we never find them.
 
they wouldn't be very hard to find if they were ready to be used
 
It seems to me that the millitary officers that have been captured by our forces would've given up information to the interrogators if they were actually going to get orders to use the WMDs from saddam.
 

Forum List

Back
Top