Witnesses At Senate Impeachment Certain: Solid, Unanimous: US National Support In Polling!

[mascale]

Since the Confession to Article II of the Impeachment has happened--Trump personally, on Fox even: Then even November 2020 is fairly certain for the Democrats.

The Constitution took the election of 2016 away from Secretary Clinton, and The Constitution can be said to be taking it away from President Trump, even this month.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Better that Moses should have chopped down a Cherry Tree!)

 

[beautress]

slowly - AND HYPOTHETICALLY

Trump wins second term

dems still control house by majority

dems take senate with 51 seats - the majority

dems file articles of impeachment AGAIN

dem majority congress impeach and remove trump.


WRITE THAT DOWN - POP QUIZ TOMORROW 8AM

Siete sez: "dems still control house by majority"​

Fortunately, Siete, Democrats have run of at least one Congressman who joined the Republicans just to get away from the multiple false narratives and the lies it took to get them there. Voters tend to frown upon lies, whether right or left, and your party's obfuscations, omissions, obsequious pursuits of George Soros' free money, and planned false witnesses have done more damage than I could say in ten thousand pages.

Enjoy your control thoughts. The American people are generally considered a sleeping giant, but they're awake now, and boy are they angry at the Shiff-Nadler-Pelosi-Waters-Schumer-Feinstein-Antifa Democrat crowd. You will see the first time in ages where the Democrats totally lose their grip on high offices. I can't even project how great the loss will be so long as your party pursues Socialistic takeover of the people they won't be able to buy with all the money in Soros' deep pockets.

Our people are down to earth. They admire anything that increases the job opportunities for their families and loved ones, and President Trump has done that and is going to really tick the Demmies off in upcoming days as he keeps promises the claim was made that he'd never keep. Too bad your party insists on playing dumb to the real numbers and keeps hiring people to lie and call it a poll because they got paid the big bucks to. Our down-to earth Americans do not like the wake up call the Democrat Party has shoved in their face with Waters' followers harrassment, California professor Christine Blasey-Ford's class on how California youngsters can and are challenged to pass lie-detector's tests, creating a false scenario and the narratives that correspond, and trying to dump one of the finest legal minds on the American front into the trash bin of history that was foiled by the horrified Lindsey Graham seeing the light of the damage of lies up close and personal, and he ushered in public opinion to favor Kavenaugh into the SCOTUS. I'm not telling you any more. I'm going to let you take it in the teeth about your party's shameful framing and lying about President Trump. I just say I have no need of kicking anyone's behiney here because Nancy Pelosi did that for you, and she is going to be out of work in the very near future.

 

[mascale]

See OP. Trump was on thin ice before anyone had ever heard of Adam Schiff, and the many others. Now they are getting way better known, even. June 19 NY Times below, was under way already.
____________________
President Trump has been on an executive privilege extravaganza. In the past month, he’s asserted it to block Congress from obtaining documents about the census citizenship question, invoked it to try to bar the full Mueller report from being given to Congress, and used it to bar his former White House counsel, Don McGahn, from providing documents to Congress.

Executive privilege has a legitimate core, but Mr. Trump’s attempts are going to wind up undermining that core, and make it harder for future presidents to govern. He is essentially saying that he will not turn over information to Congress about potential wrongdoing — the absolute weakest claim to executive privilege along the spectrum of possible claims.

Our constitutional system is defined by a balance between the public’s need for transparency and the government’s need to have a zone of secrecy around decision making. Both are important, yet they are mutually exclusive. The Constitution erred on the side of transparency, with no mention whatsoever of executive privilege in its original text. But the experience of constitutional government (what some might call a “living Constitution”) is that presidents over time have found a need for their advisers to give them frank information without fear of embarrassment, and the privilege has been used for these sorts of routine matters, by both Democratic and Republican presidents alike.

Then came Richard Nixon. He asserted executive privilege to try to block turning over tapes that implicated him and his staff in criminal activity. It didn’t go well for him. The Supreme Court unanimously ruled against Mr. Nixon, saying a president was not above the law. Because the evidence contained on the tapes suggested wrongdoing, the privilege could not be used to shield his and his staff’s misconduct from sunlight. The Supreme Court decision was signed by three justices appointed by none other than Mr. Nixon.

over a dozen times; in one instance, he tried to block two White House officials from testifying in the Monica Lewinsky investigation. Ken Starr’s impeachment referral to Congress actually enumerated this as a reason for impeachment — arguing that Mr. Clinton had abused executive privilege.

This use of executive privilege — to shield personal wrongdoing — had strong echoes of Mr. Nixon, and for that reason attracted a lot of scrutiny, not simply in Congress but also in the courts. He lost his battle to shield his aides from testifying and ultimately eroded his claim to secrecy more generally. By looking profligate and personal in his use of the privilege, he cried wolf too many times, and he found it much harder to use it in circumstances, like the pardons for former members of the Armed Forces of National Liberation, known by its Spanish acronym F.A.L.N., which waged a violent campaign for the independence of Puerto Rico (President Clinton offered them clemency in 1999 because, he said, their sentences were out of proportion with their offenses).

Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama were clearly influenced by the Clinton experience and invoked privilege only sparingly (six times for Bush, one for Obama). That was on par for the post-Nixon presidents (Presidents Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush each invoked it only once; President Reagan, three times). President Trump, by contrast, is well on his way to following the Nixon-Clinton precedents. Neither ended particularly well.

There is a deep reason for that. Americans can tolerate some secrecy, particularly when it is rooted in protection of the public’s interests. But when the claims appear to hide wrongdoing, they begin to curdle. Instead of safeguarding high-minded principles, the claims look personal, and more like something a king would do. And that is just about what Mr. Trump’s latest invocations look like.

In the teeth of a redacted report that all but labels Mr. Trump a criminal, the president’s claim to try to block the full Mueller report from coming out looks like he is trying to shield evidence of his wrongdoing. The report says: “Substantial evidence indicates that the president’s attempts to remove the special counsel were linked to the special counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the president’s conduct — and, most immediately, to reports that the president was being investigated for potential obstruction of justice.”

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Arithmetic alleged is damning enough, (Deut 23:19-20): The Moses Atrocity, Outcome eventual Holocaust!")


‘The Longing for Less’ Gets at the Big Appeal of Minimalism

After Culinary and Literary Acclaim, She’s Moving to the Woods

What Happened to Choupette?

Mr. Trump’s attempt to block Mr. McGahn from providing documents, and presumably giving oral testimony to Congress, is no doubt motivated by a fear of what it will look like on TV when Mr. Trump’s former White House counsel says to the cameras what he already said to Mr. Mueller behind closed doors: Mr. Trump ordered him to fire Mr. Mueller, and he disregarded the order.

Mr. Trump’s use of privilege to block information about his administration’s attempt to alter the census, after a federal judge found Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross’s stated reason for doing so not credible and in the wake of striking new evidence suggesting Republican machinations to add a citizenship question to suppress minority voting, appears again to be dubious. It reeks of trying to block the cold truth about the assertions Mr. Ross and Justice Department lawyers have made from coming out. They claimed that Secretary Ross added the citizenship question to help implement the Voting Rights Act. Put aside the plausibility of an argument that this administration has suddenly become concerned with enforcing the Voting Rights Act; the fact that Mr. Trump is afraid to show the documents, which aren’t about secret law enforcement or intelligence operations, raises serious concerns about whether this is anything close to a principled use of the privilege.

Every time a president invokes executive privilege, there are three relevant audiences he has to think about: the courts, Congress and the public. Each has reasons to be worried about Mr. Trump’s profligate invocations. Presidents have a limited reservoir of secrecy available to them — the more they look wanton, the more these other entities grow concerned. And the worst part is that when they abuse the privilege, they risk generating legal precedents that will make it harder for future presidents to use the privilege in settings when they legitimately need it.

It is sometimes said that this Supreme Court will do nothing against this president, that a body with a majority composed of justices appointed by Republican presidents will not rule against him.

But the experience of President Nixon was instructive. The Supreme Court is composed of life-tenured justices for a reason. No one, particularly this president, should assume that politics will protect him in the highest court in the land

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Arithmetic alleged is damning enough, (Deut 23:19-20): The Moses Atrocity, Outcome eventual Holocaust!")

 

[007]

Now Senator Schumer v. Senator McConnell puts Democrats in the Responsive Mode-Chair, not the Senate Majority Leaders. 70% plus of Republicans, 80% plus of Independents, and 90% plus of Democrats want witnesses called at the Senate Trial of John Donald Trump(?)--morning Tweets famous, at least.

71% of Republicans want Mitch McConnell to call witnesses at Trump impeachment trial, new poll shows

The Leaning Senators of the GOP--for the witnesses--are now the bulwark of the Republican National Committee. The chances for any Republicans even showing up at the RNC Convention are in their hands. The low voter turnout at the polls already getting the first glimpse in the polls(?).

Republicans, Independents, and Democrats are now US National unified: Supportive of the Democratic National Committee contentions, in the Senate.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(At Davos, GOP Leader-Not-So-Much-In-Charge could only manage to scream at a Swedish high school kid, and celebrate the bloated $1.0 tril. "Robust" Deficits-created, unable to repay any previously incurred! Ronald Reagan all-over-again! George Bush all-over-again, and-again(?))

OH ANOTHER POLL.... ya know what... THEY DIDN'T CALL AND ASK ME.

Why do you need witnesses now? I thought the demtards had an IRON CLAD CASE.

 

[mascale]

The Constitution took the election away from the popular vote winner, Secretary Clinton. The Constitution can take the Presidency away from the popular vote Loser, President Trump. The Constitution says nothing about "Executive Privilege," contrasting: At all!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!0
(Some people allow that New Testament Acts 7 can be used to explain Old Testament Moses, even!)

 

[ChemEngineer]

Donald Trump is not going to be president. You can take that to the bank. - Nancy Pelousy

You Leftists would be Hillary-us if you weren't so reprehensibly dishonest and maliciously hateful.

Payback is a Hillary ain't it.

Hateful Hillary

 

[beautress]

Now Senator Schumer v. Senator McConnell puts Democrats in the Responsive Mode-Chair, not the Senate Majority Leaders. 70% plus of Republicans, 80% plus of Independents, and 90% plus of Democrats want witnesses called at the Senate Trial of John Donald Trump(?)--morning Tweets famous, at least.

71% of Republicans want Mitch McConnell to call witnesses at Trump impeachment trial, new poll shows

The Leaning Senators of the GOP--for the witnesses--are now the bulwark of the Republican National Committee. The chances for any Republicans even showing up at the RNC Convention are in their hands. The low voter turnout at the polls already getting the first glimpse in the polls(?).

Republicans, Independents, and Democrats are now US National unified: Supportive of the Democratic National Committee contentions, in the Senate.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(At Davos, GOP Leader-Not-So-Much-In-Charge could only manage to scream at a Swedish high school kid, and celebrate the bloated $1.0 tril. "Robust" Deficits-created, unable to repay any previously incurred! Ronald Reagan all-over-again! George Bush all-over-again, and-again(?))

OH ANOTHER POLL.... ya know what... THEY DIDN'T CALL AND ASK ME.

Why do you need witnesses now? I thought the demtards had an IRON CLAD CASE.

The iron all rusted away with each and every lie the Democrats tried to cram down America's throats.

 

[DOTR]

Voting in authorized elections matters. Polling indicates negative support for no witnesses. House Evidence is suddenly admissible in the trial of John-Tweeter Donald Trump. Senate may have noticed that Trump-GOP version of "Robust Economy" can't pay down its credit obligations, just like households.

The Impeachment Process Works!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(On their Majesties. . . .Well. . ..Whatever. . . .in Disarray!)

Polls Democrats are always trumpeting polls. Polling indicated Hillary was to be the next president as well.

Polls are propaganda. And we know it now. Trump is your President until 2025.

 

[Billiejeens]

Polls have likely already influenced the impeachment trial. The two-day 24 hours plan became the three-day 24 hours plan: With no outcry, everyone likely having read the polls.

The Democrats then have the "No crime was committed" problem almost addressed automatically. There have been no trials or convictions for bribes and treason, but there is the possibility that "Obstruction of Congress" is statutory "Contempt." Back to the polls. People were supposed to show up, but did not. Then Bolton agreed to comply with a subpoena. No contempt, and a compare and contrast. Polling would probably show that to be an election issue.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great gift of usury--less well known--is that it is not, even(?)!)

HOW MANY SEATS DO THE DEMS NEED - 4 ?

House +
Senate +
=Trump fucked

impeached 2 straight terms - removed from office 2nd term .

Right here, IQ7.

You said "Dems need-4"...."Trump fucked"..."REMOVED FROM OFFICE 2ND TERM"

You clearly said 51 would remove Trump from office during his second term, moron.

EXACTLY - 2nd term when/IF they have a majority senate

2ND TERM
2ND TERM
2ND TERM

aint too damn bright are you Gomer

Now you're just doubling down on the fucking stupid dude.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Polls have likely already influenced the impeachment trial. The two-day 24 hours plan became the three-day 24 hours plan: With no outcry, everyone likely having read the polls.

The Democrats then have the "No crime was committed" problem almost addressed automatically. There have been no trials or convictions for bribes and treason, but there is the possibility that "Obstruction of Congress" is statutory "Contempt." Back to the polls. People were supposed to show up, but did not. Then Bolton agreed to comply with a subpoena. No contempt, and a compare and contrast. Polling would probably show that to be an election issue.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Great gift of usury--less well known--is that it is not, even(?)!)

HOW MANY SEATS DO THE DEMS NEED - 4 ?

House +
Senate +
=Trump fucked

impeached 2 straight terms - removed from office 2nd term .

Dems will lose seats in house, will lose a senate seat if mancin votes to impeach, and will lose the WH if the economy continues to roll.

 

[mascale]

Senator Graham has already blasted any silly inference like LordBrownTrout posted. Rep Schiff was congratulated for actually giving life and continuity to the bits of evidence the Cover-Up White House has released to Congress, and in lawsuits filed under Freedom of Information.

Message Clear: There has been something evil to it after all!

"Crow, Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Rome of Acts 7 actually like the subjugating Pharaoh s.o.b.'s!)