Wire Taps In Turmp Tower? Pelosi: 'We Don't Do That.' Clapper: 'I Can Deny it.'

[CrusaderFrank]

Crooked Hillary was either tipped off or orchestrated The Donald wiretap. Recall she was involved in the Nixon investigation. Crooked Hillary Tweeted about the wiretap one week before the election that The Donald won in a landslide.

Crooked Hillary wrote..."computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server."

Lock her and Hussaine the fuck up already!

They've gotten away with it -- so far, so they continue to act with impunity

 

[gipper]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

I fear you will wait a long time, because no amount of proof will ever satisfy you.

 

[brummelben]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

I fear you will wait a long time, because no amount of proof will ever satisfy you.

Once again you prove you have nothing

 

[Iceweasel]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

Your head is still in your rump, I see. We've had months of the Russian conspiracy and you suddenly can't wait for proof?

 

[Snouter]

Hillary Clinton on Twitter

 

[gipper]

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

Where is the proof? Any proof? This is just a feeble attempt to try and cover up the Russian connections, anything to attempt to change the subject

If you open your eyes, the proof is on the end of your nose.

Even you have not a shred of proof

the evidence is overwhelming, but being stupid makes it difficult to comprehend the truth.

Overwhelming, you stupid shyte, give us just one piece of it

Damn you are some kind of special stupid.

Ever heard of AP, Rosen, Attkinson...IRS scandal...Snowden, NSA spying on all Americans, Obie expands Patriot Act...and on and on???

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Crooked Hillary was either tipped off or orchestrated The Donald wiretap. Recall she was involved in the Nixon investigation. Crooked Hillary Tweeted about the wiretap one week before the election that The Donald won in a landslide.

Crooked Hillary wrote..."computer scientists have uncovered a covert server linking the Trump organization to a Russian-based server."

Lock her and Hussaine the fuck up already!

for all we know,,Hillary also has a server up her butt,,her other domain name is,,,,"@ClintonAss.Com"

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Juan Williams: Time for a special prosecutor
Source: The Hill

That’s why I’m starting to feel like I’ve seen this movie before.

Spoiler Alert: This political thriller ends with the president’s top aides striking plea bargains with federal prosecutors to reduce prison sentences.

The dwindling trust in the GOP majority in Congress to conduct such a probe is due to the fading credibility of the Senate Intelligence Committee. The problem is that the Republican chairman of that panel, Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), is widely perceived as a Trump acolyte.

If history is a guide, all that is left now is for public pressure to build on the GOP and the special prosecutor to be named.

Read more: Juan Williams: Time for a special prosecutor

By Jennifer Agiesta, CNN Polling Director
Updated 7:39 AM ET, Mon March 6, 2017

Washington (CNN)About two-thirds of Americans say a special prosecutor should investigate contacts between Russians and Trump campaign associates, according to a new CNN/ORC poll, and 55% say they are at least somewhat concerned by reports that some connected to the Trump campaign had contact with suspected Russian operatives.

However, the steady stream of news about investigations into those contacts doesn't appear to have affected President Donald Trump's approval rating, which ticked up only one percentage point -- 44% to 45% -- from January.

Concerns about the reported contacts are closely tied to partisanship, with 71% of Democrats saying they are "very concerned" about it while 54% of Republicans say they have no concerns "at all" about the reports.

Among Republicans, a majority feel Congress can handle the investigation, but a sizable 43% support the call for a special prosecutor, as do majorities of Democrats (82%) and independents (67%). Overall, the poll finds that 65% would rather see a special prosecutor handle the investigation, while 32% think Congress is capable of handling it.

Read more: CNN/ORC poll: Most back special prosecutor for Russia investigation - CNNPolitics.com

 

[gipper]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

Your head is still in your rump, I see. We've had months of the Russian conspiracy and you suddenly can't wait for proof?

Yeah...lefties believe Trump and Russia colluded to impact the election. Not a shred of proof was ever provided..in fact evidence shows there was no collusion.

Yet...they DEMAND proof Obie, who built the greatest surveillance police state since the Stasi, spied on Trump.

Sad. Very sad.

 

[Faun]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

 

[gipper]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

Proof is everywhere, but you must pull your head out of your stinky ass.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

The Problem with a Lying President
March 6, 2017


Rick Klein and Shushannah Walshe: “This is not normal, and this cannot be viewed as acceptable, or just another Twitter rant. The accusations leveled by President Trump over the weekend, suggesting that his predecessor committed a federal crime for political purposes by ordering him wiretapped, has troubling implications no matter the ultimate facts.”

“In the (apparently unlikely) event that Trump is proven right about something President Obama did, the consequences are obvious enough. If it turned out there were properly obtained surveillance efforts – without Obama’s involvement – at Trump Tower and of Trump associates, that means a federal intelligence judge thought there were important national-security reasons for those wiretaps. And if Trump is wrong – if the president just falsely accused an ex-president of a “sick” effort to rig an election – how can those who need to or even want to trust the president’s word do so going forward? Now, with a real crisis developing out of North Korea and who knows what’s next, is one of those times where it’s critical that the president’s words be taken literally, if he ever hopes to be taken seriously when it counts.”

First Read: “This all raises a question: What happens when a president cries wolf so many times? Can anyone believe him — even on matters like wars, national tragedies, and natural disasters? As NBC’s Benjy Sarlin wrote over the weekend,

Trump alleged what would be an historic scandal about Obama, and barely anyone reacted with urgency.”

[because everyone knows Trump is Bogus]

 

[Faun]

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

Proof is everywhere, but you must pull your head out of your stinky ass.

LOLOL

Sorry, I'm not a brain-dead conservative who can't distinguish suggestion/innuendo from actual evidence.

Suffice it to say... if there was ANY actual evidence, you yahoos would have posted it by now. You obviously can't because you obviously have not seen any actual evidence.

 

[tinydancer]

You have to have some kind of special stupid disease to think a tyrant like Big Ears, would not spy on Trump.

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

Really? The NYT and the Washington Post have beenwriting about intercepted communications for some time now.

Are they making shit up?

 

[Faun]

Where is Rumps proof?
The man cannot prove anything

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

Really? The NYT and the Washington Post have beenwriting about intercepted communications for some time now.

Are they making shit up?

Nothing about Trump being wiretapped, which is his unsubstantiated claim.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Obama is living Rent Free inside the Trump skull....

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Nothing about Trump being wiretapped, which is his unsubstantiated claim.

Trump is so Tautological that "He lies about the lies he lies about"

 

[tinydancer]

For crying out loud all the leaks are coming from surveilance. How do you think they are getting the information to leak?

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

Really? The NYT and the Washington Post have beenwriting about intercepted communications for some time now.

Are they making shit up?

Nothing about Trump being wiretapped, which is his unsubstantiated claim.

So let me get this right. I'm to beleive that everyone around Trump is being monitored but Trump isn't?

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Going so far as to examine Jared Kushner's mother's bank account and we are to believe any Democrat denying surveillance on Trump WHEN the freaking media has been telling us continually that Trump Russian connections are being investigated.

This is like living with a crazy person. Shut up! Answer me!

This just in: James Carville has just made a claim on his twitter account that Hillary Clinton is accusing him of having secret meetings with various heads of staff in the Area 51 Complex. Mr. Carville also made claim that any rumors that he purchased three Russian brides in 2016 are completely false.

You can see the evil countenance on some people as the age because the demons inside of them begin to literally manifest on the outside of them. Carville is one such individual. A true child of the devil.

A former Druid High Priest who sat on the Council of 13 and became a born again Christian said that he could always tell who was into the occult / witchcraft by the look in their eyes. He said if you look at their eyes you can see something is wrong. The left eye and right eye will be notably different. He was definitely on to something when he made that statement.

Left eye / right eye -note the difference
Charles Manson - heavily involved in the occult & demon possessed

Left eye / right eye - something is seriously off - photo of singer Gaga

Some photographs you'll see the difference immediately and in other photographs it is not so easy to see it. You have to know what you are looking for (evidence of demonic possession).

The eyes are the window to the soul. If you pay attention you'll see that the common denominator with these people is demon possession. James Carville is a servant of the devil (same as the others you see here).

 

[Faun]

The purposely blind can't see. If DNC media tell them something, then they will believe.

Still waiting for a single piece of proof

It's amusing watching these idiots dance around the stark reality that they have no actual evidence of Trump's egregious claim on Twitter.

Really? The NYT and the Washington Post have beenwriting about intercepted communications for some time now.

Are they making shit up?

Nothing about Trump being wiretapped, which is his unsubstantiated claim.

So let me get this right. I'm to beleive that everyone around Trump is being monitored but Trump isn't?

Translation: you still have no evidence Trump was wiretapped

You think I needed more evidence than that? Hell, you can't even prove "everyone around him" was wiretapped. All you can do is hurl suggestion and innuendo because you have no actual evidence.