Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
[
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
Until the Democrats ADMIT, they already know it but the only way they can get elected is to keep up the give aways to the moochers for their votes, that we have a SPENDING problem.
We know it and will never change that.
Acting like it won't do it.
You have to buy the brown vote.
With rich people's money, that's what makes it soooooo sweet!
You're scum.
I remember not too long ago you were anti obama, all that anti obama things you said in the past was a fucsada wasn't it? you were faking it
Instead of your sore-loser fantasies about this imaginary vote fraud, you could try changing your party so it doesn't hold positions that suck so badly. You need to give someone besides plutocrats, preachers and xenophobes a reason to vote Republican.
By the way, your fellow Republicans won't stand for any restriction of absentee ballots, as that's a big source of Republican votes-via-fraud.
so a incumbent Democrat wins re-election after only being President for four years so that means Republicans have to change..
Obama won by a very small number of votes yet the Republicans have to change...
this is LAUGHABLE you people believe the country has now turned totally Progressive so we should just give it up and come over to the dark side.
Progressives were able to take a legitimate issue, massive Voter fraud in Democrat controlled cities, and make it as if Republicans were the problem. They played it perfectly and because Republicans haven't figured out how and why we got played, we lost in 2012. Had the election been held in purple-fingered Baghdad, Romney would have won in a landslide.
So what can we do?
It's simple.
We don't want to appear that we're "Disenfranchising" minorities, we should embrace their participation in the democratic, but not Democratic process.
The problem is two-fold: Democrats stuff the ballot box, but then they do the counting.
We can control the stuffing process with Voter ID and a serious clamp down on absentee ballots (Blank checks), but more importantly, WE NEED TO OPEN THE COUNTING PROCESS TO BROAD DAYLIGHT!
Think of the show "Survivor" and Probst is counting ballots to see who is voted off the Island. When Dems control the count, thought the ballot says "Romney" Dems counted it as "Obama". We need to get the counting process out into the open. No more we will allow counts behind closed doors where boxes full of ballots magically appear in close races.
We can even mock the Democrat counting process as described above and that's our first step to ending the Party of Boss Tweed's stranglehold on vote counting which becomes voter fraud.
Progressives were able to take a legitimate issue, massive Voter fraud in Democrat controlled cities, and make it as if Republicans were the problem. They played it perfectly and because Republicans haven't figured out how and why we got played, we lost in 2012. Had the election been held in purple-fingered Baghdad, Romney would have won in a landslide.
So what can we do?
It's simple.
We don't want to appear that we're "Disenfranchising" minorities, we should embrace their participation in the democratic, but not Democratic process.
The problem is two-fold: Democrats stuff the ballot box, but then they do the counting.
We can control the stuffing process with Voter ID and a serious clamp down on absentee ballots (Blank checks), but more importantly, WE NEED TO OPEN THE COUNTING PROCESS TO BROAD DAYLIGHT!
Think of the show "Survivor" and Probst is counting ballots to see who is voted off the Island. When Dems control the count, thought the ballot says "Romney" Dems counted it as "Obama". We need to get the counting process out into the open. No more we will allow counts behind closed doors where boxes full of ballots magically appear in close races.
We can even mock the Democrat counting process as described above and that's our first step to ending the Party of Boss Tweed's stranglehold on vote counting which becomes voter fraud.
Some people will never understand you can't keep making welfare comfortable that will make people want to stay in the government supper table.
Instead of your sore-loser fantasies about this imaginary vote fraud, you could try changing your party so it doesn't hold positions that suck so badly. You need to give someone besides plutocrats, preachers and xenophobes a reason to vote Republican.
By the way, your fellow Republicans won't stand for any restriction of absentee ballots, as that's a big source of Republican votes-via-fraud.
so a incumbent Democrat wins re-election after only being President for four years so that means Republicans have to change..
Obama won by a very small number of votes yet the Republicans have to change...
this is LAUGHABLE you people believe the country has now turned totally Progressive so we should just give it up and come over to the dark side.
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
Until the Democrats ADMIT, they already know it but the only way they can get elected is to keep up the give aways to the moochers for their votes, that we have a SPENDING problem.
We know it and will never change that.
Instead of your sore-loser fantasies about this imaginary vote fraud, you could try changing your party so it doesn't hold positions that suck so badly. You need to give someone besides plutocrats, preachers and xenophobes a reason to vote Republican.
By the way, your fellow Republicans won't stand for any restriction of absentee ballots, as that's a big source of Republican votes-via-fraud.
so a incumbent Democrat wins re-election after only being President for four years so that means Republicans have to change..
Obama won by a very small number of votes yet the Republicans have to change...
this is LAUGHABLE you people believe the country has now turned totally Progressive so we should just give it up and come over to the dark side.
Republicans have lost 4 of the past 6 Presidential elections.
Republicans have lost 5 of the past 6 elections in the Presidential popular vote.
Republicans have lost 5 of the past 6 elections amongst moderates.
So, yeah, the party has to change.
To start, stop calling everyone who doesn't drink the Kool Aid a RINO.
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
so a incumbent Democrat wins re-election after only being President for four years so that means Republicans have to change..
Obama won by a very small number of votes yet the Republicans have to change...
this is LAUGHABLE you people believe the country has now turned totally Progressive so we should just give it up and come over to the dark side.
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
Until the Democrats ADMIT, they already know it but the only way they can get elected is to keep up the give aways to the moochers for their votes, that we have a SPENDING problem.
We know it and will never change that.
The repubs picked up votes and electorial college numbers. It is hard to beat an incumbent, even harder when the MSM is totally in their corner. The liberal left got nasty which may or may not have influenced the outcome. What we do know is that the election was NOT about the economy.
so a incumbent Democrat wins re-election after only being President for four years so that means Republicans have to change..
Obama won by a very small number of votes yet the Republicans have to change...
this is LAUGHABLE you people believe the country has now turned totally Progressive so we should just give it up and come over to the dark side.
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
Until the Democrats ADMIT, they already know it but the only way they can get elected is to keep up the give aways to the moochers for their votes, that we have a SPENDING problem.
We know it and will never change that.
The repubs picked up votes and electorial college numbers. It is hard to beat an incumbent, even harder when the MSM is totally in their corner. The liberal left got nasty which may or may not have influenced the outcome. What we do know is that the election was NOT about the economy.
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
Until the Democrats ADMIT, they already know it but the only way they can get elected is to keep up the give aways to the moochers for their votes, that we have a SPENDING problem.
We know it and will never change that.
The repubs picked up votes and electorial college numbers. It is hard to beat an incumbent, even harder when the MSM is totally in their corner. The liberal left got nasty which may or may not have influenced the outcome. What we do know is that the election was NOT about the economy.
The election was TOTALLY about the economy. Trickle-Down Economics is SCARY, and the voters rejected it. Only 30% of the votes Obama got were votes FOR him - the rest of us were voting against a return to the policies that crashed us in '08.
VOTING MACHINES are a menace to democracy. That much is obvious
Like you Crus, I not longer have confidence in the electoral process.
I didn't have it when Bush II won, I didn't have it this round, either.
Personally I think this round the MASTERS choose for Obama to win.
I think that in part explains why MITT seems to have set out to destroy his chances of winning.
NOt that I wanted the Mittster to win, but still...it's very disturbing to think that our elections are now fraudalent.
If the Republicans ever denounce Trickle Down Voodoo Economics and jettison pretty much their entire social agenda, I'll take a look to the right again at ballot time.
Until then, pass!
Reagan's started the greatest peace time expansion of the economy in history.
Which Clinton was able to ride, thanks to a GOP congress, for his whole 8 years. What Clinton did do is f...k the country with free trade agreements. What is happening today was predicted then, there is no denying that the president that has done the most harm to the US economy, or should I say working man, was WJC. To that there is no doubt. At least until we see the full effects of Obamatax. Maybe natural gas will bail out the economy, I am hoping so.
The repubs picked up votes and electorial college numbers. It is hard to beat an incumbent, even harder when the MSM is totally in their corner. The liberal left got nasty which may or may not have influenced the outcome. What we do know is that the election was NOT about the economy.
The election was TOTALLY about the economy. Trickle-Down Economics is SCARY, and the voters rejected it. Only 30% of the votes Obama got were votes FOR him - the rest of us were voting against a return to the policies that crashed us in '08.
well good, I hope it works out for you all, 8%unemployment for all of obama's first term..good luck
If you interpret fiscal conservatism as the reducing benefits for the 99% while keeping them in place for the 1%, the GOP is going have a real problem selling that. Until that attitude concerning the 47% is changed, the GOP will not be able to sell it's brand to the American Citizen.
Now should the GOP, instead of denigrating those in the military, the seniors, and the young people entering the work force at minimum wage jobs, take steps that would increase the income of these people to where they could join the rest of us in paying taxes, they would have something to sell. But just stating that they want to take some of the very little that these people have won't do a thing for the party.
The repubs picked up votes and electorial college numbers. It is hard to beat an incumbent, even harder when the MSM is totally in their corner. The liberal left got nasty which may or may not have influenced the outcome. What we do know is that the election was NOT about the economy.
The election was TOTALLY about the economy. Trickle-Down Economics is SCARY, and the voters rejected it. Only 30% of the votes Obama got were votes FOR him - the rest of us were voting against a return to the policies that crashed us in '08.
well good, I hope it works out for you all, 8%unemployment for all of obama's first term..good luck
Good point.
We need to change on some of the social issues but the CORE of our beliefs, fiscal conservatism, will never change.
I agree. The message of lower taxes and less government spending is an appealing message to Americans. But Americans also like social security, medicare and defense, which is 75% of the federal budget. Entitlements have to be reformed, and need to have a serious discussion about how we are going to finance entitlements, because if we don't, they are going to eat us alive, particularly medicare. Unless things change dramatically, that's a mathematical fact. Also, Republicans need to have a serious discussion on defense. It seems that the only posture Republicans take on defense spending is "more is never enough," as if all the criticisms about bloat, waste and inefficiency Republicans say are in the government never occur in the military.
Gay marriage is an absolute loser for the Republican party. It's going to happen. Republicans should just drop it.
