Wingnut mega-donors whining about exposure: Quit picking on us

[editec]

When you step into the political finance game in a really big way, you can pretty much expect that people are going to notice you and that they are going to find our who you are.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

 

[Lumpy 1]

When you step into the political finance game in a really big way, you can pretty much expect that people are going to notice you and that they are going to find our who you are.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that.

Where do you draw the line..for Obama/Democrats/the kind hearten liberal media ... after the children are abused obviously...

 

[J.E.D]

It is wrong to pick on private citizens for exercising their rights to support a candidate. The liberal media is trying to scare off future donors by letting people know that the media will run roughshod over them.

All three of those private citizens/rich donors have been involved in political campaigns. If they don't like the attention, then they should stay out of politics. Stop whining.

 

[8537]

Oh, the poor little rich wingnuts don't want to be exposed.

So then if you made a donation to Obama or any other candidate you think it is fair for the Republican's to name you and then publish any detail they can about you, your family and financial situation? Past arrest records of family members, DUIs, etc? Anything is fair if you donated, right?

Uh, yes! They already have that right.

The difference is that if you donate $1,000 to the campaign you have to disclose it. If you donate a billion to a SuperPAC you don't have to.

 

[boilermaker55]

They wanted money to equal speech, and they wanted that speech to be unlimited. Well, if they want to speak so loudly, they can hardly cry when their big, big voices get a response.

You asked for it, and you got it. Suck it up, buttercups.

Yes! Biggest cry-babies in the world. The rich.