Over the years, liberals attacked me for repeatedly writing messages in defense of Americas sovereignty; i.e., the very real danger of losing sovereignty to global government. I posted, and commented on, every article, every quotation, every detail I could find in order to show that powerful forces were at work trying to abolish Americas independence. I dont know how many times I pointed out that sovereignty did not belong to the New World Order crowd; hence, it is not theirs to give away. How much of a dent I made is impossible to know. I tell myself I alerted a few who were previously unaware of the insidious goal the most treacherous group of people in the world are driving towards. My efforts were rewarded in one sense.
Liberal opponents on previous message boards never defended a one government world with any substantiative arguments if at all; they simply accused me of tilting at windmills. More recently, conspiracy theories replaced windmills.
Agenda 21's environmental claptrap is neither windmill nor conspiracy theory. Agenda 21 is a relatively new prong in the attack on independent nations. Agenda 21 first saw the light of day in 1992. There have been additions and modifications since 1992.
Note that Agenda 21 was born when all of those displaced Communists flocked to environmental movement after the Soviet Union imploded.
A number of conservatives have published articles chronicling the inherent dangers in Agenda 21. For those who are not familiar with Agenda 21, three pieces by Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh make a good start in learning just how destructive it is:
Happily, the Republican partys platform includes this:
More good news : Alabama became the first state to prohibit government participation in Agenda 21. One would think that every state would follow Alabama. No such luck. Arizonas legislature would not pass a similar bill.
In any event, Agenda 21 is but one phase of the incremental attack on Americas sovereignty:
Incremental betrayal was never a secret. Fortunately, eroding Americas independence piece by piece was never separated from this essential requirement: Keep the number of average Americans aware of the threat to an absolute minimum. I said fortunately because the Internet changed everything.
Limiting the number of informed Americans opposing global government to a small handful was not a problem when the ruling class media monopoly and the Fairness Doctrine controlled the dissemination of information.
Today, opposition to a one government world is becoming a problem for the New World Order crowd as more and more Americans see and understand what quislings are up to. I believe the tipping point is close at hand. Once enough well-informed Americans become engaged the chance of establishing a global government by incremental bites decreases dramatically.
Organizations and individuals cited in the linked article are not blind. They know they are losing ground because of the Internet. That is why they must throw caution to the wind and go all-out in their efforts to abolish national sovereignty before the aforementioned tipping point is reached. Implementing Agenda 21 is an important part of the push for global government.
I want to remind everyone there are two forces driving towards a one government world. Socialists/Communists and wealthy ruling classes in every country. In every instance their ultimate goal is the same totalitarian government. Whenever the forces for totalitarian government confront each other they form an alliance. That makes stopping them doubly difficult.
Experience taught me that when I concentrated on exposing wealthy traitors for what they are I was painted a Socialist/Communist. Attacking Socialists exclusively immediately labeled me an uncaring stooge for the rich. Whenever I advocated defending individual liberties and the Constitution I found myself accused of being a pseudo-patriot and warmonger.
The CFR
This quote from Henry Kissinger is a philosophical roadmap to global government:
Everything I know about Kissinger was gathered from his public persona, things he said, his television appearances that I saw, things said about him. Based on those shadows he is ambiguous at best. His Harvard education and his long association with that institution coupled with his Nobel Peace Prize makes everything he says suspect. Im sure intellectuals love him. My average-joe opinion is that he is a one world government stooge who dearly wants to be one of the people he serves.
Long before Agenda 21
Prior to WWI, ruling classes never hesitated when it came to sending others out to die in foreign wars. Until the invention of flying machines and poison gas being dropped from those planes ruling classes had little fear of being killed by mistake in a war they started even if their country lost the war. Then, as now, ruling classes protect their own kind.
Being killed by mistake, especially after the invention of the atomic bomb, suddenly convinced totalitarians of every stripe that war might blow them to a nuclear hell along with everyone else. If nuclear war scared the hell out of them, just imagine what chemical and biological WMD is doing to them? My point: Kissinger has it backwards:
It is so-called world leaders who are pleading with free people to abandon their freedoms in order to protect ruling classes.
In short: Liberty is worth dying for, but apparently Kissinger and his pals are not willing to die for a one government world; hence, the necessary con job. The folks who populate every powerful global government organization know that when the rubber meets the road most individuals will fight and die for their own liberties, while not too many will risk their lives for the likes of Kissinger & Friends.
Kissinger is also wrong about this:
Which unknown is Kissinger talking about in the context of global government? Death? Everybody knows they are going to die.
The method of dying? possibly fear of nuclear war has certainly been an effective scare tactic. The question should be: Which one is worse, being beheaded by a crazed Muslim fanatic, or dying instantly in a nuclear holocaust? Dead is dead no matter how you get there.
Fear of the next life? That fear only affects guilt-laden sinners and religious true believers regardless of Hamlets generalization:
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered country from whose bourn
No traveler returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Suffering before dying? There is something to that fear when it is applied to the tender mercies the New World Order crowd has planned for everyone else. The fear of being enslaved by a global ruling class amounts to long-term suffering for the slaves, and is a greater fear for most people than is fear of Hamlets undiscovered country.
One does not have to be a political genius to know that there is not a bit of difference between being enslaved by a global government and being enslaved by a national government.
I can only hope that those who read this message also read the linked article. Ill close with this excerpt:
The Council on Foreign Relations
Will American Sovereignty Withstand the Onslaught of Global Government Forces?
By Ron Ewart Monday, December 6, 2010
Will American Sovereignty Withstand the Onslaught of Global Government Forces?
Liberal opponents on previous message boards never defended a one government world with any substantiative arguments if at all; they simply accused me of tilting at windmills. More recently, conspiracy theories replaced windmills.
Agenda 21's environmental claptrap is neither windmill nor conspiracy theory. Agenda 21 is a relatively new prong in the attack on independent nations. Agenda 21 first saw the light of day in 1992. There have been additions and modifications since 1992.
Note that Agenda 21 was born when all of those displaced Communists flocked to environmental movement after the Soviet Union imploded.
A number of conservatives have published articles chronicling the inherent dangers in Agenda 21. For those who are not familiar with Agenda 21, three pieces by Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh make a good start in learning just how destructive it is:
Happily, the Republican partys platform includes this:
More good news : Alabama became the first state to prohibit government participation in Agenda 21. One would think that every state would follow Alabama. No such luck. Arizonas legislature would not pass a similar bill.
In any event, Agenda 21 is but one phase of the incremental attack on Americas sovereignty:
Incremental betrayal was never a secret. Fortunately, eroding Americas independence piece by piece was never separated from this essential requirement: Keep the number of average Americans aware of the threat to an absolute minimum. I said fortunately because the Internet changed everything.
Limiting the number of informed Americans opposing global government to a small handful was not a problem when the ruling class media monopoly and the Fairness Doctrine controlled the dissemination of information.
Today, opposition to a one government world is becoming a problem for the New World Order crowd as more and more Americans see and understand what quislings are up to. I believe the tipping point is close at hand. Once enough well-informed Americans become engaged the chance of establishing a global government by incremental bites decreases dramatically.
Organizations and individuals cited in the linked article are not blind. They know they are losing ground because of the Internet. That is why they must throw caution to the wind and go all-out in their efforts to abolish national sovereignty before the aforementioned tipping point is reached. Implementing Agenda 21 is an important part of the push for global government.
I want to remind everyone there are two forces driving towards a one government world. Socialists/Communists and wealthy ruling classes in every country. In every instance their ultimate goal is the same totalitarian government. Whenever the forces for totalitarian government confront each other they form an alliance. That makes stopping them doubly difficult.
Experience taught me that when I concentrated on exposing wealthy traitors for what they are I was painted a Socialist/Communist. Attacking Socialists exclusively immediately labeled me an uncaring stooge for the rich. Whenever I advocated defending individual liberties and the Constitution I found myself accused of being a pseudo-patriot and warmonger.
The CFR
This quote from Henry Kissinger is a philosophical roadmap to global government:
Everything I know about Kissinger was gathered from his public persona, things he said, his television appearances that I saw, things said about him. Based on those shadows he is ambiguous at best. His Harvard education and his long association with that institution coupled with his Nobel Peace Prize makes everything he says suspect. Im sure intellectuals love him. My average-joe opinion is that he is a one world government stooge who dearly wants to be one of the people he serves.
Long before Agenda 21
Prior to WWI, ruling classes never hesitated when it came to sending others out to die in foreign wars. Until the invention of flying machines and poison gas being dropped from those planes ruling classes had little fear of being killed by mistake in a war they started even if their country lost the war. Then, as now, ruling classes protect their own kind.
Being killed by mistake, especially after the invention of the atomic bomb, suddenly convinced totalitarians of every stripe that war might blow them to a nuclear hell along with everyone else. If nuclear war scared the hell out of them, just imagine what chemical and biological WMD is doing to them? My point: Kissinger has it backwards:
It is so-called world leaders who are pleading with free people to abandon their freedoms in order to protect ruling classes.
In short: Liberty is worth dying for, but apparently Kissinger and his pals are not willing to die for a one government world; hence, the necessary con job. The folks who populate every powerful global government organization know that when the rubber meets the road most individuals will fight and die for their own liberties, while not too many will risk their lives for the likes of Kissinger & Friends.
Kissinger is also wrong about this:
Which unknown is Kissinger talking about in the context of global government? Death? Everybody knows they are going to die.
The method of dying? possibly fear of nuclear war has certainly been an effective scare tactic. The question should be: Which one is worse, being beheaded by a crazed Muslim fanatic, or dying instantly in a nuclear holocaust? Dead is dead no matter how you get there.
Fear of the next life? That fear only affects guilt-laden sinners and religious true believers regardless of Hamlets generalization:
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscovered country from whose bourn
No traveler returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Suffering before dying? There is something to that fear when it is applied to the tender mercies the New World Order crowd has planned for everyone else. The fear of being enslaved by a global ruling class amounts to long-term suffering for the slaves, and is a greater fear for most people than is fear of Hamlets undiscovered country.
One does not have to be a political genius to know that there is not a bit of difference between being enslaved by a global government and being enslaved by a national government.
I can only hope that those who read this message also read the linked article. Ill close with this excerpt:
The Council on Foreign Relations
Will American Sovereignty Withstand the Onslaught of Global Government Forces?
By Ron Ewart Monday, December 6, 2010
Will American Sovereignty Withstand the Onslaught of Global Government Forces?
