Though the so-called "MSM" is routinely characterized around here as left-leaning liberals hell-bent on electing Barack Obama again, it seems as though the Wall Street Journal has given Romney space to explain his foreign policy in the Op-Ed pages. Maybe the WSJ isn't "mainstream," right?
But, be that as it may...Romney spends about 2/3rds of this criticizing Obama (his stock in trade), then offers up some unspecific platitudes about restoring the "three sinews of our influence: our economic strength, our military strength and the strength of our values."
Naturally, he doesn't say much about HOW he'll do that, other than selling our collective souls to Israel.
Nothing new here once again. Handed a national and international stage on which to present his ideas, he's once again failed to take advantage of it. Just one more opportunity to be specific on his policy goals which he's ignored.
One begins to wonder if he even HAS any specifics.
Mitt Romney: A New Course for the Middle East - WSJ.com
But, be that as it may...Romney spends about 2/3rds of this criticizing Obama (his stock in trade), then offers up some unspecific platitudes about restoring the "three sinews of our influence: our economic strength, our military strength and the strength of our values."
Naturally, he doesn't say much about HOW he'll do that, other than selling our collective souls to Israel.
Nothing new here once again. Handed a national and international stage on which to present his ideas, he's once again failed to take advantage of it. Just one more opportunity to be specific on his policy goals which he's ignored.
One begins to wonder if he even HAS any specifics.
Mitt Romney: A New Course for the Middle East - WSJ.com