Abstract
Scientists believe significant climate change is unavoidable without a drastic reduction in the emissions of greenhouse gases from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, few countries have implemented comprehensive policies that price this externality or devote serious resources to developing low-carbon energy sources.
The historical record indicates that the supply of fossil fuels has consistently increased over time and that their relative price advantage over low-carbon energy sources has not declined substantially over time. Without robust efforts to correct the market failures around greenhouse gases, relying on supply and/or demand forces to limit greenhouse gas emissions is relying heavily on hope.
American Economic Association
And the simple answer is...................NOPE!!!!
The operative word in the above paragraphs? HOPE!!!!
And the 97% consensus?
Nobody cares s0ns!!!
But keep knocking yourselves out s0ns telling us what the "experts" and "real scientists" say!!!
Scientists believe significant climate change is unavoidable without a drastic reduction in the emissions of greenhouse gases from the combustion of fossil fuels. However, few countries have implemented comprehensive policies that price this externality or devote serious resources to developing low-carbon energy sources.
The historical record indicates that the supply of fossil fuels has consistently increased over time and that their relative price advantage over low-carbon energy sources has not declined substantially over time. Without robust efforts to correct the market failures around greenhouse gases, relying on supply and/or demand forces to limit greenhouse gas emissions is relying heavily on hope.
American Economic Association
And the simple answer is...................NOPE!!!!
The operative word in the above paragraphs? HOPE!!!!And the 97% consensus?
Nobody cares s0ns!!!
But keep knocking yourselves out s0ns telling us what the "experts" and "real scientists" say!!!
