Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
classic.so I guess something like obama care rates as what? extending individual liberties?denial aint a river you know?
It is the conservatives who insist on getting into your bedroom, telling you who you can marry, deny homosexuals from serving their country, deny Muslims the right to worship
I would rather have affordable healthcare
Obama isn't down with homosexual marriage either, be careful throwing around your who hit johns, Clinton he signed dadt, who denied Muslims the right to worship?
We all saw the vote last week
I don't think its too hard to comprehend that the founders would not approve of our massive social nanny state along with our military ops around the world.
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness
I don't think its too hard to comprehend that the founders would not approve of our massive social nanny state along with our military ops around the world.
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness
I'm having a hard time believing even you would believe that happiness is found in a government social program.
I see you've given up on the silliness that was your argument that the fillibuster violates the Constitution.I don't think its too hard to comprehend that the founders would not approve of our massive social nanny state along with our military ops around the world.
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness
I see you've given up on the silliness that was your argument that the fillibuster violates the Constitution.I don't think its too hard to comprehend that the founders would not approve of our massive social nanny state along with our military ops around the world.
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness
classic.
Obama isn't down with homosexual marriage either, be careful throwing around your who hit johns, Clinton he signed dadt, who denied Muslims the right to worship?
We all saw the vote last week
your answer is nonsensical.
The senate has plenary power to make up its own rules for its prcedures, according to the Constitution.I see you've given up on the silliness that was your argument that the fillibuster violates the Constitution.Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness
Not in the least. The intent of the Constitution was a majority vote not a 60 percent vote
The senate has plenary power to make up its own rules for its prcedures, according to the Constitution.I see you've given up on the silliness that was your argument that the fillibuster violates the Constitution.
Not in the least. The intent of the Constitution was a majority vote not a 60 percent vote
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
We all saw the vote last week
your answer is nonsensical.
How did Republicans vote on DADT?
You did not answer my question:The senate has plenary power to make up its own rules for its prcedures, according to the Constitution.Not in the least. The intent of the Constitution was a majority vote not a 60 percent vote
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
In that case, you would not object to the Senate voting to change it's procedures next week.
Requiring 60 votes amounts to a defacto change in the Constitutional requirement for a simple majority
You did not answer my question:The senate has plenary power to make up its own rules for its prcedures, according to the Constitution.
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
In that case, you would not object to the Senate voting to change it's procedures next week.
Requiring 60 votes amounts to a defacto change in the Constitutional requirement for a simple majority
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness
No, no it doesn't. Votes for passage still require a majority.60 votes circumvents the majority vote requirementYou did not answer my question:In that case, you would not object to the Senate voting to change it's procedures next week.
Requiring 60 votes amounts to a defacto change in the Constitutional requirement for a simple majority
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
-I'm- not the one argung that the rules cannot be changed.Where does it say the Senate can't vote to change the rules?
They did change the rules...Constitutionally...when they made the 60-vote rule.You did not answer my question:In that case, you would not object to the Senate voting to change it's procedures next week.
Requiring 60 votes amounts to a defacto change in the Constitutional requirement for a simple majority
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
60 votes circumvents the majority vote requirement
Where does it say the Senate can't vote to change the rules?
They did change the rules...Constitutionally...when they made the 60-vote rule.You did not answer my question:
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
60 votes circumvents the majority vote requirement
Where does it say the Senate can't vote to change the rules?
You need to stop framing your opposition as a Constitutional matter. Because it's not.
No, he just doesn't like that the rule will benefit Republicans.They did change the rules...Constitutionally...when they made the 60-vote rule.60 votes circumvents the majority vote requirement
Where does it say the Senate can't vote to change the rules?
You need to stop framing your opposition as a Constitutional matter. Because it's not.
Leftwingshitflinger can chock this thread up as an epic FAIL.
Dave? You are correct. This is not a Constitutional matter.
You did not answer my question:In that case, you would not object to the Senate voting to change it's procedures next week.
Requiring 60 votes amounts to a defacto change in the Constitutional requirement for a simple majority
What, specifically, about the 60-vote rule for cloture violates what specific part of the Constitution?
60 votes circumvents the majority vote requirement
Where does it say the Senate can't vote to change the rules?
The Constitution was written by Liberals
A lot of the founders were classical liberals. There is no comparison to that term and progressive/dems/liberals of today. They would laugh, jump on their clipper, and sail the hell away from this circus to start all over again.
The founding fathers would be ashamed of our current conservatives...much the same as they were ashamed of the conservatives of their day
No, he just doesn't like that the rule will benefit Republicans.They did change the rules...Constitutionally...when they made the 60-vote rule.
You need to stop framing your opposition as a Constitutional matter. Because it's not.
Leftwingshitflinger can chock this thread up as an epic FAIL.
Dave? You are correct. This is not a Constitutional matter.
