Will Social Media Get It Done?

Discussion in 'Congress' started by Flanders, Jan 8, 2017.

  1. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    From the day the United Nations succeeded the League of Nations people of enormous wealth and political influence shutdown all public discourse in opposition to U.S. membership in the UN. Nothing has changed since 1945:


    The UN Resolution that issued Israel’s death warrant triggered a greater outcry than did all of the combined United Nations disgraces in the past 72 years. Resolution 2334 was reported in newspapers and on television for a few days then dropped before it could do more damage to the UN’s already shoddy reputation.

    Resolution 2334 never stood a chance on television as did missing flight MH370 and countless other death stories that television’s ghouls fed on for months. A sprinkling of voices do mention 2334, and even criticize the United Nations itself, but the Internet is only thing keeping opposition to the United Nations alive. The following should be a major story, but you will not hear it on television:


    In response to the U.N.’s recent resolution condemning Israel, a major effort is under way to urge the U.S. to withdraw its funding of the global body, with some critics even calling for complete withdrawal and the expulsion of U.N. headquarters from American soil.​

    Big list of leaders calling for U.S. to defund U.N.
    Posted By -NO AUTHOR- On 01/07/2017 @ 8:31 pm

    Big list of leaders calling for U.S. to defund U.N.

    Only time will tell if social media has become big enough to move Congress to pass H.R. 1205. I have hopes that withdrawal’s time has come even though it’s been around since 1997 and never got out of committee. (Previously H.R. 1146 and H.R. 75.)

    H. R. 1205 Is Looking Good

    Finally, Donald Trump’s twitters are read by millions and discussed on television. One word from him could push Congress into laying a foundation for withdrawal after he is sworn in. Should The Donald come out for withdrawal he will be the first billionaire of either party to oppose the United Nations as far as I know.
     
  2. TheOldSchool
    Offline

    TheOldSchool BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    54,299
    Thanks Received:
    9,044
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    last stop for sanity before reaching the south
    Ratings:
    +35,891
  3. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    17,267
    Thanks Received:
    3,210
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +7,263
    Lets keep the eye on the ball here and concentrate on lifting the heavy burden of regulations from business, turning the burner up on the economy, and rewriting taxation.

    Ain't nobody got time for this.
     
  4. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    37,295
    Thanks Received:
    4,916
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +11,520
    You would like to lessen, "the heavy burden of regulations from business", a topic well worth debate and discussion, which is a clarion call within the thinking of Republican supporters. But, much as the repeal of the ACA has become, does anyone understand the consequences should such changes take place?

    Many feel (an emotion) that only benefits will be the product of such administrative actions, but how many really know what is in the Federal Register and the CFR?

    Check 'em out:

    FindLaw: Cases and Codes: Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
     
  5. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    17,267
    Thanks Received:
    3,210
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +7,263
    Yes, the consequences will be a better economy and the fearmongering of dire consequences will not occur. Though I'm sure that the democrats and their supporters will seek to find the most horrendous instances of harm they can and then pass that off as what will be the norm.

    The truth is, many of the regulations that burden business in this country serves a political purpose, not a public one.
     
  6. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    To TheOldSchool: Short answer: A one government world administered by the United Nations.

    More importantly:


    In addition to the United States International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945, the sneaks who got this country into the UN knew what they were doing when they designed a foundation that was a masterpiece of betrayal. A foundation that would withstand every challenge when their descendants carried on. Treason became legal the minute the US became a member of an underhanded organization that was, and is, determined to tear down America. Membership in the UN meant that no American official betraying this country on the UN’s behalf could be prosecuted for treason. Only lawyers could design something like that.

    http://www.usmessageboard.com/congress/259446-defining-treason.html

    And if you must spout United Nations crapola in my threads at least accompany your link with your views promoting the discredited justification for the UN. Or are you too stupid to make a case for the United Nations in your own words?
     
  7. TheOldSchool
    Offline

    TheOldSchool BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    54,299
    Thanks Received:
    9,044
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    last stop for sanity before reaching the south
    Ratings:
    +35,891
    You should have just clicked the link
     
  8. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    To TheOldSchool: I did. The answer is pure global government bullshit. The only thing missing is “prevent a nuclear war”, and that one is still up for grabs when you consider Democrats handing Iran nuclear capabilities.
     
  9. nick21punishment
    Offline

    nick21punishment Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2017
    Messages:
    9
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +3
    The truth is, many of the regulations that burden business in this country serves a political purpose, not a public one.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Flanders
    Offline

    Flanders ARCHCONSERVATIVE

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2010
    Messages:
    7,628
    Thanks Received:
    743
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,034
    Petition, legislation, put U.N. in state of 'uncertainty' over future
    Posted By Bob Unruh On 01/27/2017 @ 11:27 pm

    Petition, legislation, put U.N. in state of ‘uncertainty’ over future

    Incidentally, before President Trump does more kissy-kissy with Prime Minister Theresa May somebody should remind him that Great Britain also has a permanent seat on the Security Council.
    Question: Did Trump ask May why her government did not veto UN Resolution 2334?

    Question: Do average Brits feel the same way about the United Nations they feel about the EU? Answer: If not why not?


    Britain’s Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalism Good, Climate Change a Priority
    by Raheem Kassam26 Jan 2017

    Britain's Theresa May in U.S.: Islam is Peaceful, Globalist Orgs Good, Climate Change Priority
     

Share This Page