Will 4 years be enough time for Romney to clean up Obama's one term Mess?

Will 4 years be enough time for Romney to clean up Obama's one term Mess?


Indeed, it is quite possible that Papa Obama has done so much damage
it could take generations to recover from it.

You lost me at "Papa Obama". Learn to speak like a normal person, instead of an asshole, and I just might give a shit what you have to say.

He's not bi-lingual, so don't get your hopes up.
 
Things changed when Raygun became president, and became exacerbated after Clinton was sworn in......US politics has never been the same since. Hell, they even managed to survive Nixon and Carter.....just....but Raygun took it all to a whole new level of vitriole...

we watched the left and progressives take vitriol to new level with the Bush administration...so don't act like they were saints and wanted to bring the country together and all hold hands and sing kumbaya..
Bullshit!

Bush got a cakewalk compared to the vitriol you Alinskyites dished out to "Slick Willie" Bubba Clinton!

Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.

May 14, 2007
RUSH: Everything we did about Clinton was humorous. It had a political point. We were making fun of and laughing.

January 24, 2007
RUSH: One of the techniques that Alinsky has advocated be used against people you need to destroy is ridicule, because there's no response to it. When you get ridiculed and made fun of, that's the toughest thing to have a response because everybody's laughing at you... In order to execute the strategeries and the policies of Saul Alinsky, you cannot have a soul, you cannot have a conscience, because your sole objective is to destroy people and ruin them.

Hardly....some of us did live through those times....don't know if you did or not
and I don't give a shit about your stupid RUSH quotes..
 
IF, and it's a big "if", Romney is elected, I guarantee you that there will be an immediate reaction from the business world and it will be very good for the economy.

Hopefully, I will get that chance to point it out to the left wing nuts who don't know their asses from their elbows.

Most of the fear and uncertainty in the economy would be gone. Democrats will be hard pressed to make all of the new economic activity that a Republican in the White House would generate overnight look bad. But they will try.

The last Republican in the White House generated death, debt, and a stock market at 7800 when left office. He also sent thousands of US troops to their deaths, and blamed it on "bad intel". bin Laden lived on, NO did not; and the 911 dead didn't spur as much action as The Hunt For the Man Who Threatened Poppy.

And Romney, who is even more clueless about foreign policy than Bush was, has surrounded himself with essentially the same old Bush team.

If you liked Bush's foreign policy, you'll get it reinstated if Romney is elected.
 
Yeah it will take a generation to pay for his fiscal piracy, its a shame he and Holder will face no ju:mad:sice it seems. (Fast n furious/Libya)
 
What is the "very little bit that he does differ is important and will make a diffence"?

What are you talking about. Be concise if you can.

Do you know enough about how business works to understand that companies hire workers because the need to build more of what they make or provide more of their services.

Good business men/women will not sacrifice their business just to make a political point. YOu think business men don't want to be successful? YOu think they are not hiring because they dislike Obama.

Maybe a few Rethugs are that dumb. But they prolly have to much money anyway. Reasonable business men will grow their business when the situation warrants. Not depending on who is POTUS.

big business is already successful. corporate america is thriving. it's workers who aren't. you do understand the difference, yes?

so yes... corporate america WILL sacrifice its workers in order to get its political agenda (which has nothing to do with protecting workers or our environment or anything but their own profits) through.

that is why citizens united is the worst case since dred scott.

Right wingers are stupid enough to believe the nonsense that all wealth flows down. Give the rich more tax cuts and they'll go out and create jobs. Good luck getting that business plan by investors. The truth is that without consumers, wealth will stay at the top. Look at the recent HP news. They made a good profit, and are still laying people off. The last resort for any business is to hire new people, unless there's a strong enough consumer demand, and know that they'll lose market share if they don't.
 
Most of the fear and uncertainty in the economy would be gone. Democrats will be hard pressed to make all of the new economic activity that a Republican in the White House would generate overnight look bad. But they will try.

The last Republican in the White House generated death, debt, and a stock market at 7800 when left office. He also sent thousands of US troops to their deaths, and blamed it on "bad intel". bin Laden lived on, NO did not; and the 911 dead didn't spur as much action as The Hunt For the Man Who Threatened Poppy.

And Romney, who is even more clueless about foreign policy than Bush was, has surrounded himself with essentially the same old Bush team.

If you liked Bush's foreign policy, you'll get it reinstated if Romney is elected.

And Obama was a pro when it came to Foreign Policy.? he was a damn JUNIOR senator of less than two years for crying out loud..
Is all you people have to run against is Bush?
 
And Obama was a pro when it came to Foreign Policy.? he was a damn JUNIOR senator of less than two years for crying out loud..
Is all you people have to run against is Bush?

Well, he was a bona fide professional compared to his predecessor

What does being a junior senator have to do with it?
I have never run for anything politically, yet consider myself very well informed about the foreign policies and natures of many countries..

Countless people on this board - going from their posts, and from both sides of the political spectrum - are the same..

You remember the interview with Bush pre election where he was asked to name six world leaders....he hardly got one right. He was one of the most incurious leaders of the world I have ever seen...one of America's biggest embarassments...

That is what really cracks me up about the wingnuts. They say Obama "embarasses" them when he if overseas. Why? Most of us think he is ten times better than the previous bloke in office..
 
The entire Western world is collapsing because we are using force of gubmint to take money from the productive people - and when there isn't enough - to borrow it from future generations - to give it to the lazy and greedy who don't earn it.

In other words, Liberalism is destroying everything.
 
One term should be plenty people. With a willing congress they can repeal the onerous bills and regulations. Obama losing in itself will turn the economic and jobs ship around. That's right, I believe Obama's exit will trigger a spark in our economy.

If Romney can't get the vast majority of it done in one term he should be challenged. No need to pander with bullshit excuses or blame.
 
Obama like a laser beam on unemployment- soon as the 6 fundraisers are over
:eusa_whistle:

President Obama Hosts 6 Fundraisers Friday on Minneapolis, Chicago Visit

President Obama will jump-start what looks to be a major June fundraising push with six money events today in Minneapolis and Chicago – the most fundraisers he’s held in a single day since launching his bid for a second term.
Obama is expected to raise more than $7.2 million total for the Obama Victory Fund (OVF), according to figures provided by the campaign.

I just hope he does have some time for a golf game or two

The guys with the most money win 90% plus of the elections nowadays,

and you want Obama to unilaterally disarm under those circumstances?

That's a convenient argument.
 
Will 4 years be enough time for Romney to clean up Obama's one term Mess?


Indeed, it is quite possible that Papa Obama has done so much damage
it could take generations to recover from it.

If he makes the right decisions it's more than possible. Reagan cleaned up after Carter in about two years.
 
The entire Western world is collapsing because we are using force of gubmint to take money from the productive people - and when there isn't enough - to borrow it from future generations - to give it to the lazy and greedy who don't earn it.

In other words, Liberalism is destroying everything.

Start posting when you have a clue...Sock...
 
Will 4 years be enough time for Romney to clean up Obama's one term Mess?


Indeed, it is quite possible that Papa Obama has done so much damage
it could take generations to recover from it.

If he makes the right decisions it's more than possible. Reagan cleaned up after Carter in about two years.

He didn't clean up shit.

He did however lay the foundation for all the shit that is happening now...
 
He won't be saddled with the worst recession since the Great Depression, if he can pull it out. That will make his job much easier than Obama's was.
 
The entire Western world is collapsing because we are using force of gubmint to take money from the productive people - and when there isn't enough - to borrow it from future generations - to give it to the lazy and greedy who don't earn it.

In other words, Liberalism is destroying everything.

Ever notice that the appearance of the word 'gubmint' is an extremely reliable indicator that the poster has nothing intelligent to contribute?
 
Will 4 years be enough time for Romney to clean up Obama's one term Mess?


Indeed, it is quite possible that Papa Obama has done so much damage
it could take generations to recover from it.

If he makes the right decisions it's more than possible. Reagan cleaned up after Carter in about two years.

He didn't clean up shit.

He did however lay the foundation for all the shit that is happening now...

Wasn't it you who just told someone to come back when they had a clue?

Ironic
 
If he makes the right decisions it's more than possible. Reagan cleaned up after Carter in about two years.

He didn't clean up shit.

He did however lay the foundation for all the shit that is happening now...

Wasn't it you who just told someone to come back when they had a clue?

Ironic

Who do you think got rid of the oversight with regard to credit unions etc?

Now, you were saying about irony and having a clue...

Get back to me when you have one...
 
The entire Western world is collapsing because we are using force of gubmint to take money from the productive people - and when there isn't enough - to borrow it from future generations - to give it to the lazy and greedy who don't earn it.

In other words, Liberalism is destroying everything.

Ever notice that the appearance of the word 'gubmint' is an extremely reliable indicator that the poster has nothing intelligent to contribute?

That must be your way of saying 'OUCH.'

:lol:
 
Will 4 years be enough time for Romney to clean up Obama's one term Mess?


Indeed, it is quite possible that Papa Obama has done so much damage
it could take generations to recover from it.

If he makes the right decisions it's more than possible. Reagan cleaned up after Carter in about two years.

Nonsense.

The business cycle ran its course under Reagan, the Fed started easing monetary policy in 1982, and oil prices started falling dramatically for reasons that Reagan had nothing to do with.
That is how things got 'cleaned up'.

All Reagan did was saddle us with triple digit deficits through his insane fiscal policies, and he made it politically survivable to do so...

...thus began our tax cut, borrow, and spend death spiral,

and Ronald Reagan was its Father.
 

Forum List

Back
Top