WikiLeaks to Publish 3700 Israeli Cables

Dead Man Walking.

Yeah he might want to be in a nice US prison.
The Joos never quit till they get you.

well, not that i'm agreeing with the assessment of what the mossad will do (since they've known for ages assange was going to release more docs) but is it a bad thing to be tenacious in the face of people who want you dead?

and it's jews, not joos. :thup:
 
You're not getting different news; however, we're all getting different views.

Arab elites see Iran as a threat to their existence and rightfully so in some cases, Saudi Arabia, for example.

The majority of Arabs see the US and Israel as far greater threats to their existence:

Georgie, you're clueless, as usual. Go take a drink.

The majority of Arabs see Iran as the greater threat.

The Financial Times
Iran woos Arab states as sanctions loom
At the official level, relations between Iran and the leaders of neighbouring Arab states tend to be polite without being warm. But beneath the surface, it seems, suspicion of Iran on the western side of the Gulf has deepened markedly.

A survey by YouGov, commissioned by Qatar’s Doha Debates and published last week, found that on the Arab side 80 per cent of those surveyed do not believe Iran’s assurances that it is not trying to develop nuclear weapons.

The poll, which surveyed more than 1,000 people in 18 Arab countries last month, found that most see Iran as a bigger threat to security than Israel, with a third believing Iran is just as likely as Israel to target Arab countries.


So Manouchehr Mottaki, the Iranian foreign minister, faced an uphill task when he arrived in Bahrain at the weekend to attend a security summit organised by the International Institute for Strategic Studies. Iranian officials tried to use the event, a rare occasion on which senior politicians from both sides of the Gulf meet openly, to enlist the support of Arab states as the west considers tougher sanctions.
FT.com / Middle East / Politics & Society - Iran woos Arab states as sanctions loom
"The corporate media are reliable and consistent.

"They consistently focus on the sensational, and they reliably take the position of the US government.

Why do you consistently side with those getting rich from war and debt?

WikiLeaks...

Er, dumbass, the study revealing Arabs view Iran as the #1 threat was conducted by an Arab firm.

You're so stupid, Georgie, it's not even funny. But, we still laugh at you.:lol:
 
Governments Lie

"Sorely lacking in all the attention given to the Wikileaks cables is an analysis of the functioning of empire.

"While the cables may not reveal anything radically new, particularly to an astute left-liberal audience, it does offer a concrete snap shot of the workings of US policy.

"And if nothing else it provides proof positive that governments lie.

"The US lies to its people, and its allies lie to theirs."

WikiLeaks
 
Georgie, you're clueless, as usual. Go take a drink.

The majority of Arabs see Iran as the greater threat.

The Financial Times
Iran woos Arab states as sanctions loom

FT.com / Middle East / Politics & Society - Iran woos Arab states as sanctions loom
"The corporate media are reliable and consistent.

"They consistently focus on the sensational, and they reliably take the position of the US government.

Why do you consistently side with those getting rich from war and debt?

WikiLeaks...

Er, dumbass, the study revealing Arabs view Iran as the #1 threat was conducted by an Arab firm.

You're so stupid, Georgie, it's not even funny. But, we still laugh at you.:lol:
Brooking Institute or the University of Maryland?

Zogby?

Why would it matter if an "Arab" firm conducted the poll?

Would Mossad be more credible in your mind?

How about Kissinger Associates?
 
"The corporate media are reliable and consistent.

"They consistently focus on the sensational, and they reliably take the position of the US government.

Why do you consistently side with those getting rich from war and debt?

WikiLeaks...

Er, dumbass, the study revealing Arabs view Iran as the #1 threat was conducted by an Arab firm.

You're so stupid, Georgie, it's not even funny. But, we still laugh at you.:lol:
Brooking Institute or the University of Maryland?

Zogby?

Why would it matter if an "Arab" firm conducted the poll?

Would Mossad be more credible in your mind?

How about Kissinger Associates?

You have as many functioning brain cells as you have reputational points: Zero.

Keep drinking, boozer.

Arabs view Iran as the #1 threat.
 
Governments Lie

"Sorely lacking in all the attention given to the Wikileaks cables is an analysis of the functioning of empire.

"While the cables may not reveal anything radically new, particularly to an astute left-liberal audience, it does offer a concrete snap shot of the workings of US policy.

"And if nothing else it provides proof positive that governments lie.

"The US lies to its people, and its allies lie to theirs."

WikiLeaks

Alcoholic. Sad. :cuckoo:
 
Over the past year which US policies have the Arabs sampled been most disappointed with?

Palestine/Israel... 61%

"Palestine" doesn't appear on this UN map, boozer...:lol:
http://www.un.org/Depts/Cartographic/map/profile/israel.pdf


Maybe, it's because "Palestine" ceased to exist in 1948. :lol::lol:

Middle East Historian Bernard Lewis...:clap2:
The Palestine entity, formally established and defined by Britain, was formally abolished in 1948 with the termination of the Mandate.


Keep drinking, Jihadi Georgie. Hiccup.
 
Last edited:
When Assange admitted that materials damaging to Israel were allowed to be removed from Wikileaks by outsiders, The New York Times and unnamed others, he failed to clarify the process used for adding material to Wikileaks. This process is called “seeding.”

When Brzezinski accused Assange of “seeding” Wikileaks with “pointed material” on behalf of an “intelligence agency,” this is the process he was referring to. It isn’t just that Wikileaks protects Israel but that material damaging to Israel’s enemies is now proven to have been chosen specifically.

GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II-THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CRUSHES WIKILEAKS : Veterans Today

Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didn’t want to publish it
In an excusive interview with Al Jazeera, Assange said only a meagre number of files related to Israel had been published so far, because the newspapers in the West that were given exclusive rights to publish the secret documents were reluctant to publish many sensitive information about Israel.

“There are 3,700 files related to Israel and the source of 2,700 files is Israel. In the next six months we intend to publish more files depending on our sources,” said Assange in the nearly one-hour interview telecast live from the UK.
Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didn’t want to publish it
 
When Assange admitted that materials damaging to Israel were allowed to be removed from Wikileaks by outsiders, The New York Times and unnamed others, he failed to clarify the process used for adding material to Wikileaks. This process is called “seeding.”


Ho Say, good thing Assange wasn't around during your shitty country Spain's 400 year Spanish Inquisition massacre, right? He might have been burned alive like so many millions.:eek:

But, given Assange's sexual tendencies, he would fit in well in Spain today, which is the sex offender capital of the world...:eek:
Why Spain is a magnet for sex offenders

No wonder you live in Spain, Ho Say. :lol:
 
When Assange admitted that materials damaging to Israel were allowed to be removed from Wikileaks by outsiders, The New York Times and unnamed others, he failed to clarify the process used for adding material to Wikileaks. This process is called “seeding.”

When Brzezinski accused Assange of “seeding” Wikileaks with “pointed material” on behalf of an “intelligence agency,” this is the process he was referring to. It isn’t just that Wikileaks protects Israel but that material damaging to Israel’s enemies is now proven to have been chosen specifically.

GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II-THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CRUSHES WIKILEAKS : Veterans Today

Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didn’t want to publish it
In an excusive interview with Al Jazeera, Assange said only a meagre number of files related to Israel had been published so far, because the newspapers in the West that were given exclusive rights to publish the secret documents were reluctant to publish many sensitive information about Israel.

“There are 3,700 files related to Israel and the source of 2,700 files is Israel. In the next six months we intend to publish more files depending on our sources,” said Assange in the nearly one-hour interview telecast live from the UK.
Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didn’t want to publish it
From GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II:

"We know what has been released.

"The genuinely sensitive material held by Wikileaks, that tying Israel to actions against America in Iraq, tying Israel to the drug trade in Afghanistan and tying Israel to terrorism in Pakistan, have yet to be seen.

"Will Assange be releasing these reports in 6 months? Why wait that long?...

"This won’t be said enough times.

"When material was added and taken away to serve the purpose of powerful outside groups, in this case, all with powerful Israeli ties, it made Wikileaks an agent of censorship, an agent of propaganda and totally discredited the Wikileaks project."

Before totally discrediting Wikileaks we should decide if Assange, "for some unknown reason, placed full authority for what the public could and couldn't be trusted with in the hands of the New York Times."

We should also examine the pedigree of those labeling WikiLeaks an intelligence operation. Zbigniew Brezinski's a known quantity, Gordon Duff is new to me.

"Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.

"His career has included extensive experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as diplomatic officer of UN humanitarian groups.

"Gordon Duff's articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages. He is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest.

Assange and WikiLeaks have already made powerful enemies around the globe. There's little reason to think attacks against Wiki will become any less sophisticated, complex, or difficult to unravel.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Jos
When Assange admitted that materials damaging to Israel were allowed to be removed from Wikileaks by outsiders, The New York Times and unnamed others, he failed to clarify the process used for adding material to Wikileaks. This process is called “seeding.”

When Brzezinski accused Assange of “seeding” Wikileaks with “pointed material” on behalf of an “intelligence agency,” this is the process he was referring to. It isn’t just that Wikileaks protects Israel but that material damaging to Israel’s enemies is now proven to have been chosen specifically.

GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II-THE ALTERNATIVE MEDIA CRUSHES WIKILEAKS : Veterans Today

Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didn’t want to publish it
In an excusive interview with Al Jazeera, Assange said only a meagre number of files related to Israel had been published so far, because the newspapers in the West that were given exclusive rights to publish the secret documents were reluctant to publish many sensitive information about Israel.

“There are 3,700 files related to Israel and the source of 2,700 files is Israel. In the next six months we intend to publish more files depending on our sources,” said Assange in the nearly one-hour interview telecast live from the UK.
Assange is holding dirt on Israel because western newspapers didn’t want to publish it
From GORDON DUFF: WIKIWEASEL II:

"We know what has been released.

"The genuinely sensitive material held by Wikileaks, that tying Israel to actions against America in Iraq, tying Israel to the drug trade in Afghanistan and tying Israel to terrorism in Pakistan, have yet to be seen.

"Will Assange be releasing these reports in 6 months? Why wait that long?...

"This won’t be said enough times.

"When material was added and taken away to serve the purpose of powerful outside groups, in this case, all with powerful Israeli ties, it made Wikileaks an agent of censorship, an agent of propaganda and totally discredited the Wikileaks project."

Before totally discrediting Wikileaks we should decide if Assange, "for some unknown reason, placed full authority for what the public could and couldn't be trusted with in the hands of the New York Times."

We should also examine the pedigree of those labeling WikiLeaks an intelligence operation. Zbigniew Brezinski's a known quantity, Gordon Duff is new to me.

"Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.

"His career has included extensive experience in international banking along with such diverse areas as consulting on counter insurgency, defense technologies or acting as diplomatic officer of UN humanitarian groups.

"Gordon Duff's articles are published around the world and translated into a number of languages. He is regularly on TV and radio, a popular and sometimes controversial guest.

Assange and WikiLeaks have already made powerful enemies around the globe. There's little reason to think attacks against Wiki will become any less sophisticated, complex, or difficult to unravel.

Drinking so early in the morning, Jihadi Georgie, or did you not even stop from yesterday.
Hiccup! :lol:
 
Manufactured Dissent?

"Wikileaks has the essential features of a process of 'manufactured dissent'.
"It seeks to expose government lies.

"It has released important information on US war crimes. But once the project becomes embedded in the mould of mainstream journalism, it is used as an instrument of media disinformation:

"It is in the interest of the corporate elites to accept dissent and protest as a feature of the system inasmuch as they do not threaten the established social order.

"The purpose is not to repress dissent, but, on the contrary, to shape and mould the protest movement, to set the outer limits of dissent. To maintain their legitimacy, the economic elites favor limited and controlled forms of opposition... To be effective, however, the process of 'manufacturing dissent' must be carefully regulated and monitored by those who are the object of the protest movement " (See Michel Chossudovsky, "Manufacturing Dissent": the Anti-globalization Movement is Funded by the Corporate Elites, September 2010)

"What this examination of the Wikileaks project also suggests is that the mechanics of New World Order propaganda, particularly with regard to its military agenda, has become increasingly sophisticated.

"It no longer relies on the outright suppression of the facts regarding US-NATO war crimes.

"Nor does it require that the reputation of government officials at the highest levels, including the Secretary of State, be protected. New World Order politicians are in a sense 'disposable'. They can be replaced.

"What must be protected and sustained are the interests of the economic elites, which control the political apparatus from behind the scenes.

"In the case of Wikileaks, the facts are contained in a data bank; many of those facts, particularly those pertaining to foreign governments serve US foreign policy interests. Other facts tend, on the other hand to discredit the US administration.

"With regard to financial information, the release of data pertaining to a particular bank instigated via Wikileaks by a rival financial institution, could potentially be used to trigger the collapse or bankrutpcy of the targeted financial institution.

"All the Wiki-facts are selectively redacted, they are then 'analyzed' and interpreted by a media which serves the economic elites.

"While the numerous pieces of information contained in the Wikileaks data bank are accessible, the broader public will not normally take the trouble to consult and scan through the Wikileaks data bank.

"The public will read the redacted selections and interpretations presented in major news outlets.

"A partial and biased picture is presented. The redacted version is accepted by public opinion because it is based on what is heralded as a 'reliable source', when in fact what is presented in the pages of major newspapers and on network TV is a carefully crafted and convoluted distortion of the truth."

WikiLeaks as cyops????????

Who is Behind Wikileaks
 
Manufactured Dissent?

"Wikileaks has the essential features of a process of 'manufactured dissent'.
"It seeks to expose government lies.
Moire George bullshit :lol::lol::lol:

Still drinking since Christmas Eve, Jihad George? Hiccup!
 
Last edited:
True or False?

"World bankers, by pulling a few simple levers that control the flow of money, can make or break entire economies.

"By controlling press releases of economic strategies that shape national trends, the power elite are able to not only tighten their stranglehold on this nation's economic structure, but can extend that control world wide.

"Those possessing such power would logically want to remain in the background, invisible to the average citizen." (Aldous Huxley)

Who is Behind...
 
True or False?

"World bankers, by pulling a few simple levers that control the flow of money, can make or break entire economies.

Get a job, slacker and pay some taxes to help the flow of money to California's economy, parasite.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top