Discussion in 'Wikileaks' started by Contumacious, May 17, 2017.
Published on Aug 9, 2016
He literally says "We don't comment on who our sources are." So this is a lie.
There’s Major Fuckery Afoot With The Washington Post, And I Think I Know Why
SANE thinking people with critical thinking skills had already come to the conclusion that Seth Rich was the source of the leaked e-mails....but leftards wanted to stay in denial. Remember this leaked e-mail of "Skippy the Molesta" Podesta? : "I'm definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it." https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36082#efmAGSAH- …
He virtually identified Seth Rich. I believe that if the contributor is dead thar he should identify the individual outright.
They want to protect HRC and her cohorts by any means
None of which changes the fact that you lied about what Assange said, nor do I think he cares what you think WikiLeaks's policy on their sources should be.
I understand that anything that favors DJT irritates you.
Deal with it.
He identified Seth the best way he could under the circumstances.
Only a dumb fuck like yourself can pretend not to know who he was talking about.
How would it favor Trump even if it weren't a complete fabrication on your part?
Fucking conspiracy tards Assange didn't say it, but he did INSINUATE it and after catching much shit for that admited that the insinuation was wrong, that's not what he meant.
Assange clarifies Seth Rich Statements • r/WikiLeaks
Separate names with a comma.