wikileaks dumps 'iraq war diary' biggest leak in military history

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by blu, Oct 22, 2010.

  1. blu
    Offline

    blu Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2009
    Messages:
    6,836
    Thanks Received:
    774
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +774
  2. R.C. Christian
    Offline

    R.C. Christian Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    9,955
    Thanks Received:
    1,074
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Ghetto
    Ratings:
    +1,195
    Well, I think it's generally, and I state this carefully, a good idea to have access to this type of nformation. Trouble is, I'm still trying to figure out if wikileaks is a legitimate whistle blower or some kind of disinformation campaign.
     
  3. CaféAuLait
    Offline

    CaféAuLait This Space for Rent

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2008
    Messages:
    7,776
    Thanks Received:
    1,947
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Pacific Northwest
    Ratings:
    +2,323
    It says a lot to me that they told the news organizations to wait until 10 days before the election to release it to the public. So I see them not as a whistle blower but someone trying to politicize the war and not care who they get killed.
     
  4. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Would be a good idea if the names were left out. That was a real asshole thing to do. Those are actual people who's actual lives are in danger.
     
  5. R.C. Christian
    Offline

    R.C. Christian Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2010
    Messages:
    9,955
    Thanks Received:
    1,074
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Ghetto
    Ratings:
    +1,195
    I agree.
     
  6. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    Or possibly both?

    Truly effective disinformation has to include true information to give it credibility and cover.
     
  7. georgephillip
    Offline

    georgephillip Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2009
    Messages:
    26,428
    Thanks Received:
    1,265
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    Ratings:
    +2,039
    If a "Death Tax" of 100% was applied to all unearned war profits with the funds deposited in a Trust Fund for US vets killed and disabled by the invasions and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, do you think support for war among our RICHEST citizens might collapse?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. loosecannon
    Offline

    loosecannon Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2007
    Messages:
    4,888
    Thanks Received:
    263
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +264
    I read yesterday that they redacted all the names from the 400,000 pages. I dunno if that is true but they have been making efforts to minimize the impacts of their leaks on the ongoing war effort.

    As for politicizing the leaks; I think it is clear that wikileaks thinks of the wars as a crime spree. War is always a crime spree.
     
  9. Navy1960
    Offline

    Navy1960 Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2008
    Messages:
    5,821
    Thanks Received:
    1,188
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Arizona
    Ratings:
    +1,189
    I could care less about what efforts wiki-leaks is making, they are an organization set up for the sole purpose of obtaining classified US Govt. documents to publish by whatever means they see fit. In doing so they place US Military personnel in harms way and cost lives of US assets across the globe. This is no less than espionage .

    *To convey information with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the armed forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies. This was punishable by death or by imprisonment for not more than 30 years.

    The Espionage Act of 1917 was a United States federal law passed on June 15, 1917, shortly after the U.S. entry into World War I, during the First Red Scare.[1]

    It prohibited any attempt to interfere with military operations, support America's enemies during wartime, to promote insubordination in the military, or interfere with military recruitment. In 1919, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Schenck v. United States that the act did not violate the free speech rights of those convicted under its provisions.

    Espionage Act of 1917 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    Now I'm sure all of you will come out in defense of this nonsense by wikileaks with the Daniel Ellsberg defense . So lets address that shall we.

    Due to the gross governmental misconduct and illegal evidence gathering, and the defense by Leonard Boudin and Harvard Law School professor Charles Nesson, Judge Byrne dismissed all charges against Ellsberg and Russo on May 11, 1973 after the government claimed it had "lost" records of wiretapping against Ellsberg. Byrne ruled: "The totality of the circumstances of this case which I have only briefly sketched offend a sense of justice. The bizarre events have incurably infected the prosecution of this case."[20]
    Daniel Ellsberg - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    Article I, Section 6 of the United States Constitution provides that "for any Speech or Debate in either House, [a Senator or Representative] shall not be questioned in any other Place", thus the Senator could not be prosecuted for anything said on the Senate floor, and, by extension, for anything entered to the Congressional Record, allowing the Papers to be publicly read without threat of a treason trial and conviction. This was confirmed by the Supreme Court in the decision Gravel v. United States.

    Pentagon Papers - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


    So dont be under the mistaken impression that wikileaks is somehow this wonderful organization that is exercising their right 1st amendment rights to publsh this information " illegally obatined" and in violation of the 1917 Act.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  10. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    Oh the Horror of the people knowing what is being done in their names.
     

Share This Page