Why would anyone from South Carolina actually vote for this guy?

APNewsBreak: Records show Greene's military flops - Yahoo! News

From Alvin Greenes Military Record

In a performance report two years later, Greene received adequate marks for performing tasks assigned to him, complying with standards and training requirements. But Greene's reviewer marked him as an ineffective leader who lacked organization and was "unable to express thoughts clearly."

Greene is "usually capable of handling mundane tasks with supervision" but is "not able to adapt to any changes to daily routine," the reviewer wrote, also noting that Greene had received multiple disciplinary actions for failing to perform his duties.

Greene was also written up for posting sensitive information on a military Internet server, a mistake that resulted in a three-day work stoppage. Records showed Greene was kept at Shaw while the rest of his unit deployed after leadership "recognized his inability to contribute to the wartime mission."


A year later, Greene was evaluated again, this time in his new job as an analyst working with the weapons of mass destruction section. But Greene's job had little to do with intelligence analysis and more to do with shredding documents and escorting contractors around the base.

Again receiving low marks for ineffective leadership, Greene also was rated as not knowing much about his duties or performing them effectively and not complying with minimum training requirements.

The reviewer also wrote Greene "required a daily to-do list" to perform basic duties and had a "consistent inability to follow instructions or maintain basic job knowledge." Most seriously, the reviewer wrote that Greene would represent "a threat to others" because of his inability to grasp the basics of military training.


This thing gets stranger and stranger....how could he win a primary he didn't campaign in by a landslide?

The funny part is....if you actually listened to his first speech, and could struggle through his unpolished delivery, he sounded like he was an average American citizen and only wanted what was best for average Americans. DOes he have the skills to go to Capitol Hill and get it done? Probably not. However, I sort of liked the fact that he was NOT a career politician and his lack of speaking skills made it seem as if he was closer to you and I, than most of our career politicians.

Wow... you used that very same reasoning to denounce Bush as an idiot.

Nitwit full-of-shit.... EXPOSED.

Wrong. Bush was a liar and couldn't pass a 3rd grade speeking test. How sad is it that Greene actually made Bush look bad?
 
The funny part is....if you actually listened to his first speech, and could struggle through his unpolished delivery, he sounded like he was an average American citizen and only wanted what was best for average Americans. DOes he have the skills to go to Capitol Hill and get it done? Probably not. However, I sort of liked the fact that he was NOT a career politician and his lack of speaking skills made it seem as if he was closer to you and I, than most of our career politicians.

Wow... you used that very same reasoning to denounce Bush as an idiot.

Nitwit full-of-shit.... EXPOSED.

Wrong. Bush was a liar and couldn't pass a 3rd grade speeking test. How sad is it that Greene actually made Bush look bad?

Bush doesn't have the list of lies like obama does.
 
APNewsBreak: Records show Greene's military flops - Yahoo! News

From Alvin Greenes Military Record

In a performance report two years later, Greene received adequate marks for performing tasks assigned to him, complying with standards and training requirements. But Greene's reviewer marked him as an ineffective leader who lacked organization and was "unable to express thoughts clearly."

Greene is "usually capable of handling mundane tasks with supervision" but is "not able to adapt to any changes to daily routine," the reviewer wrote, also noting that Greene had received multiple disciplinary actions for failing to perform his duties.

Greene was also written up for posting sensitive information on a military Internet server, a mistake that resulted in a three-day work stoppage. Records showed Greene was kept at Shaw while the rest of his unit deployed after leadership "recognized his inability to contribute to the wartime mission."


A year later, Greene was evaluated again, this time in his new job as an analyst working with the weapons of mass destruction section. But Greene's job had little to do with intelligence analysis and more to do with shredding documents and escorting contractors around the base.

Again receiving low marks for ineffective leadership, Greene also was rated as not knowing much about his duties or performing them effectively and not complying with minimum training requirements.

The reviewer also wrote Greene "required a daily to-do list" to perform basic duties and had a "consistent inability to follow instructions or maintain basic job knowledge." Most seriously, the reviewer wrote that Greene would represent "a threat to others" because of his inability to grasp the basics of military training.


This thing gets stranger and stranger....how could he win a primary he didn't campaign in by a landslide?

The guy is braindead. He isn't a serious candidate, this was a setup.
 
APNewsBreak: Records show Greene's military flops - Yahoo! News

From Alvin Greenes Military Record

In a performance report two years later, Greene received adequate marks for performing tasks assigned to him, complying with standards and training requirements. But Greene's reviewer marked him as an ineffective leader who lacked organization and was "unable to express thoughts clearly."

Greene is "usually capable of handling mundane tasks with supervision" but is "not able to adapt to any changes to daily routine," the reviewer wrote, also noting that Greene had received multiple disciplinary actions for failing to perform his duties.

Greene was also written up for posting sensitive information on a military Internet server, a mistake that resulted in a three-day work stoppage. Records showed Greene was kept at Shaw while the rest of his unit deployed after leadership "recognized his inability to contribute to the wartime mission."


A year later, Greene was evaluated again, this time in his new job as an analyst working with the weapons of mass destruction section. But Greene's job had little to do with intelligence analysis and more to do with shredding documents and escorting contractors around the base.

Again receiving low marks for ineffective leadership, Greene also was rated as not knowing much about his duties or performing them effectively and not complying with minimum training requirements.

The reviewer also wrote Greene "required a daily to-do list" to perform basic duties and had a "consistent inability to follow instructions or maintain basic job knowledge." Most seriously, the reviewer wrote that Greene would represent "a threat to others" because of his inability to grasp the basics of military training.


This thing gets stranger and stranger....how could he win a primary he didn't campaign in by a landslide?

The guy is braindead. He isn't a serious candidate, this was a setup.

If it was.....it will be interesting to find out how it was done. Greene seems to have come out of nowhere with someone backing him. Why he would run for the second most powerful position in the state when he has no money himself does not make sense

How did he win an election for such a high profile position without even running for it? No ads, no commercials, no grassroots support

How did he win by landslide? Looks like an election in some puppet dictatorship
 
APNewsBreak: Records show Greene's military flops - Yahoo! News

From Alvin Greenes Military Record

In a performance report two years later, Greene received adequate marks for performing tasks assigned to him, complying with standards and training requirements. But Greene's reviewer marked him as an ineffective leader who lacked organization and was "unable to express thoughts clearly."

Greene is "usually capable of handling mundane tasks with supervision" but is "not able to adapt to any changes to daily routine," the reviewer wrote, also noting that Greene had received multiple disciplinary actions for failing to perform his duties.

Greene was also written up for posting sensitive information on a military Internet server, a mistake that resulted in a three-day work stoppage. Records showed Greene was kept at Shaw while the rest of his unit deployed after leadership "recognized his inability to contribute to the wartime mission."


A year later, Greene was evaluated again, this time in his new job as an analyst working with the weapons of mass destruction section. But Greene's job had little to do with intelligence analysis and more to do with shredding documents and escorting contractors around the base.

Again receiving low marks for ineffective leadership, Greene also was rated as not knowing much about his duties or performing them effectively and not complying with minimum training requirements.

The reviewer also wrote Greene "required a daily to-do list" to perform basic duties and had a "consistent inability to follow instructions or maintain basic job knowledge." Most seriously, the reviewer wrote that Greene would represent "a threat to others" because of his inability to grasp the basics of military training.


This thing gets stranger and stranger....how could he win a primary he didn't campaign in by a landslide?

The guy is braindead. He isn't a serious candidate, this was a setup.

If it was.....it will be interesting to find out how it was done. Greene seems to have come out of nowhere with someone backing him. Why he would run for the second most powerful position in the state when he has no money himself does not make sense

How did he win an election for such a high profile position without even running for it? No ads, no commercials, no grassroots support

How did he win by landslide? Looks like an election in some puppet dictatorship

Chris Matthews was asking him a lot of questions when Greene showed up on the radar. He can't even think very clearly. He has some money but it really isn't about that because he got a lot of votes.

He will lose the election I'm sure but by how much? Will his campaign and vote counting be examined?
 
The guy is braindead. He isn't a serious candidate, this was a setup.

If it was.....it will be interesting to find out how it was done. Greene seems to have come out of nowhere with someone backing him. Why he would run for the second most powerful position in the state when he has no money himself does not make sense

How did he win an election for such a high profile position without even running for it? No ads, no commercials, no grassroots support

How did he win by landslide? Looks like an election in some puppet dictatorship

Chris Matthews was asking him a lot of questions when Greene showed up on the radar. He can't even think very clearly. He has some money but it really isn't about that because he got a lot of votes.

He will lose the election I'm sure but by how much? Will his campaign and vote counting be examined?

It would be interesting if there was a fix

If they could fix the Primaries by such a wide margin, could they fix the General Election?

Can you imagine if this moron actually won?
 
Wrong. Bush was a liar and couldn't pass a 3rd grade speeking test. How sad is it that Greene actually made Bush look bad?

Bush doesn't have the list of lies like obama does.

You mean like WMDs ?????

You are a moron, we've been here before. Bush was given the same information clinton had. Bush didn't lie about Iraq, he may have been lied to clinton .

But that's just one. that still does over shadow the list of lies in the bio of obama.
 
Bush doesn't have the list of lies like obama does.

You mean like WMDs ?????

You are a moron, we've been here before. Bush was given the same information clinton had. Bush didn't lie about Iraq, he may have been lied to clinton .

But that's just one. that still does over shadow the list of lies in the bio of obama.

Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." –President Bush, standing under a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier, May 2, 2003

It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." –Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, testifying before the House Budget Committee prior to the Iraq war, Feb. 27, 2003

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, when asked about weapons of mass destruction in an ABC News interview, March 30, 2003
 
Already, the Kay Report identified dozens of weapons of mass destruction-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations." –President Bush, 2004 State of the Union Address

The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction, as the core reason." --Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, "Vanity Fair" interview, May 28, 2003
 
And the grand daddy of them all....

We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud." –National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, on Iraq's nuclear capabilities and the Bush administration's case for war, Sept. 8, 2002
 
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01

"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI


"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
 
You mean like WMDs ?????

You are a moron, we've been here before. Bush was given the same information clinton had. Bush didn't lie about Iraq, he may have been lied to clinton .

But that's just one. that still does over shadow the list of lies in the bio of obama.

Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." –President Bush, standing under a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier, May 2, 2003

It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." –Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, testifying before the House Budget Committee prior to the Iraq war, Feb. 27, 2003

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, when asked about weapons of mass destruction in an ABC News interview, March 30, 2003

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is that the best you can come up with? LOL wake me when you can come up with some direct lies that have been proven lies that Bush had said.
 
You are a moron, we've been here before. Bush was given the same information clinton had. Bush didn't lie about Iraq, he may have been lied to clinton .

But that's just one. that still does over shadow the list of lies in the bio of obama.

Major combat operations in Iraq have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed." –President Bush, standing under a "Mission Accomplished" banner on the USS Lincoln aircraft carrier, May 2, 2003

It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." –Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, testifying before the House Budget Committee prior to the Iraq war, Feb. 27, 2003

We know where they are. They're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat." –Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, when asked about weapons of mass destruction in an ABC News interview, March 30, 2003

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Is that the best you can come up with? LOL wake me when you can come up with some direct lies that have been proven lies that Bush had said.

Hey...thanks for the invite
Love to point out how Bush mislead us

"I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." --Vice President Dick Cheney, on the Iraq insurgency, June 20, 2005
 
Ladies and gentlemen, these are not assertions. These are facts, corroborated by many sources, some of them sources of the intelligence services of other countries." –Secretary of State Colin Powell, testifying about Iraq's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons capabilities before the United Nations Security Council, Feb. 5, 2003
 
It's hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam’s security forces and his army. Hard to imagine." –Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, testifying before the House Budget Committee prior to the Iraq war, Feb. 27, 2003
 
British intelligence has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production." –President Bush, 2003 State of the Union Address
 
It's a slam-dunk case!" –CIA Director George Tenet, discussing WMD and the case for war during a meeting in the Oval Office, Dec. 21, 2002
 
We know he's been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons, and we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." –Vice President Dick Cheney, "Meet The Press" March 16, 2003
 
From Meet the Press, March 16 2003

Vice President Cheney: Now, I think things have gotten so bad inside Iraq, from the standpoint of the Iraqi people, my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. And the president's made it very clear that our purpose there is, if we are forced to do this, will in fact be to stand up a government that's representative of the Iraqi people, hopefully democratic due respect for human rights, and it, obviously, involves a major commitment by the United States, but we think it's a commitment worth making. And we don't have the option anymore of simply laying back and hoping that events in Iraq will not constitute a threat to the U.S. Clearly, 12 years after the Gulf War, we're back in a situation where he does constitute a threat.

Mr. Russert: If your analysis is not correct, and we're not treated as liberators, but as conquerors, and the Iraqis begin to resist, particularly in Baghdad, do you think the American people are prepared for a long, costly, and bloody battle with significant American casualties?

Vice President Cheney: Well, I don't think it's likely to unfold that way, Tim, because I really do believe that we will be greeted as liberators. I've talked with a lot of Iraqis in the last several months myself, had them to the White House. The president and I have met with them, various groups and individuals, people who have devoted their lives from the outside to trying to change things inside Iraq. And like Kanan Makiya who's a professor at Brandeis, but an Iraqi, he's written great books about the subject, knows the country intimately, and is a part of the democratic opposition and resistance. The read we get on the people of Iraq is there is no question but what they want to the get rid of Saddam Hussein and they will welcome as liberators the United States when we come to do that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top