Why would anyone continue to claim the iraqi war was a failure?

[JakeStarkey]

Muslims are killing Muslims If not we would have 0 issues Al Qaeda went to Iraq to set up base prior to invasion Saddam invaded Kuwait 1991, he got his ass kicked, he surrendered, he agreed to terms that he later ignored And killed millions of Muslims The coalition that went into Iraq went there to clean up a mess that began in the 70s

The one issue you continually dodge is that there are exactly 0 Muslims killing Christian children for money in your hometown. Saddam's crimes in Iraq are dwarfed by an illegal US invasion and occupation that has murdered, maimed, incarcerated or displaced one in four Iraqis since March of 2003.
As to your neo-con crocodile tears for "a mess that began in the 70s" tell us why Ronald Reagan, Dick Cheney, and Donald Rumsfeld made the mess worse in the 80s: "An eight-year-old Senate report confirms that disease-producing and poisonous materials were exported, under U.S. government license, to Iraq from 1985 to 1988 during the Iran-Iraq war. Furthermore, the report adds, the American-exported materials were identical to microorganisms destroyed by United Nations inspectors after the Gulf War. "The shipments were approved despite allegations that Saddam used biological weapons against Kurdish rebels and (according to the current official U.S. position) initiated war with Iran."
Reagan's WMD Connection to Saddam Hussein by Jacob Hornberger

The US never provided anything to Saddam for the use to kill millions of his own people To terrorize by paying families to sacrifice one of there own by blowing up them selves to kill and maim others Iraqis dis placed after the 34 countries went into Iraq to remove Saddam were done by Saddam loyalist, Al Qaeda as well as other radicals Without terrorist, no war
without Saddam, no war root cause, not blame those who went there to clean the mess up

The Reaganites supported Saddam, thus they are implicit in Saddam terrorizing his own people. The bushies violated international law and invaded Iraq. Saddam could have been toppled without invasion. With bush and cheney, however, war was inevitable.

 

[JRK]

fir you Jake
Five years on, few Iraq myths are as persistent as the notion that the Bush Administration invented a connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. Yet a new Pentagon report suggests that Iraq’s links to world-wide terror networks, including al Qaeda, were far more extensive than previously understood.
The rise of Islamic fundamentalism in the region gave Saddam the opportunity to make terrorism, one of the few tools remaining in Saddam’s ‘coercion’ toolbox, not only cost effective but a formal instrument of state power,” the authors conclude. Throughout the 1990s, the Iraqi Intelligence Service (IIS) cooperated with Hamas; the Palestine Liberation Front, which maintained a Baghdad office; Force 17, Yasser Arafat’s private army; and others. The IIS gave commando training for members of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, the organization that assassinated Anwar Sadat and whose “emir” was Ayman al-Zawahiri, who became Osama bin Laden’s second-in-command when the group merged with al Qaeda in 1998.
WSJ: Saddam-terrorist connections get no media coverage « Hot Air

 

[GoneBezerk]

Strange that we haven't heard of the massive civil war in Iraq predicted by the idiots here......crickets because not much is going on over there. So much for Buuuuuuuuuush ruining the lives of Iraqis.

 

[JakeStarkey]

For you, JRK. The only myths about Iraq are yours. WMDs, as described by the bushies, did not exist. No Iraqis were on the twin towers planes and no Iraqi money was involved in it. The bushies waged unlawful war. End of story.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Strange that we haven't heard of the massive civil war in Iraq predicted by the idiots here.......

The killing continues, but the shi'ites have realized that buying off the sunnis is good policy. However, Iraq is growing closer to Iran, and that is a fact.

 

[GoneBezerk]

No dumbfuck, the "civil war" you predict hasn't happened.

Mostly because only a few radicals on both sides want to fight whereas most Iraqis see a brighter future working together.

Also, Iran is too busy helping Assad and worrying about us/Israel bombing their ass in the next year than to help their scumbag friends in Iraq.

Once Iran is brought under control, assholes like you won't have anything to lie about regarding US policy in the middle east because most countries will then be normal functioning countries on the world stage, instead of what they were under Saddam, Assad and the Iranian mullahs.

Strange that we haven't heard of the massive civil war in Iraq predicted by the idiots here.......

The killing continues, but the shi'ites have realized that buying off the sunnis is good policy. However, Iraq is growing closer to Iran, and that is a fact.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No fuck me, the "civil war" you predict hasn't happened. Mostly because only a few radicals on both sides want to fight whereas most Iraqis see a brighter future working together. Also, Iran is too busy helping Assad and worrying about us/Israel bombing their ass in the next year than to help their scumbag friends in Iraq. Once Iran is brought under control, assholes like you won't have anything to lie about regarding US policy in the middle east because most countries will then be normal functioning countries on the world stage, instead of what they were under Saddam, Assad and the Iranian mullahs.

Strange that we haven't heard of the massive civil war in Iraq predicted by the idiots here.......

The killing continues, but the shi'ites have realized that buying off the sunnis is good policy. However, Iraq is growing closer to Iran, and that is a fact.

You need to read what I wrote, and then respond to that, instead of the voices in your head.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Nive cover-up, asswipe.

Your predictions for Iraq haven't come true, but you continue to lie and lie here to make your boner against Buuuuuuuuush look good.

Syria has WMDs but we haven't bombed them, why is that? oh, it's because they haven't recently invaded their neighbor like Saddam did. Now if Syria attacks Israel, Jordan or Turkey then Assad will become Saddam II.

So behave as a dictator, stay within your own border unless you want a US led coalition blowing your ass up.

No fuck me, the "civil war" you predict hasn't happened. Mostly because only a few radicals on both sides want to fight whereas most Iraqis see a brighter future working together. Also, Iran is too busy helping Assad and worrying about us/Israel bombing their ass in the next year than to help their scumbag friends in Iraq. Once Iran is brought under control, assholes like you won't have anything to lie about regarding US policy in the middle east because most countries will then be normal functioning countries on the world stage, instead of what they were under Saddam, Assad and the Iranian mullahs.

The killing continues, but the shi'ites have realized that buying off the sunnis is good policy. However, Iraq is growing closer to Iran, and that is a fact.

You need to read what I wrote, and then respond to that, instead of the voices in your head.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The killing continues in Iraq: fact.

Iran and Iraq draw more closely: fact

If we attacked Syria, you would condemn the admin: fact.

You attacked the admin for carefully orchestrating the overthrow of Khadaffi: fact.

If Assad attacks his neighbors, the Arab League will destroy him: fact.

Your silly far righty talking points merely point you out as the dupe and running dog of those who hate America.

Nive cover-up, "I admit I am an" asswipe. Your predictions for Iraq haven't come true, but you continue to lie and lie here to make your boner against Buuuuuuuuush look good. Syria has WMDs but we haven't bombed them, why is that? oh, it's because they haven't recently invaded their neighbor like Saddam did. Now if Syria attacks Israel, Jordan or Turkey then Assad will become Saddam II. So behave as a dictator, stay within your own border unless you want a US led coalition blowing your ass up.

 

[JRK]

No dumbfuck, the "civil war" you predict hasn't happened.

Mostly because only a few radicals on both sides want to fight whereas most Iraqis see a brighter future working together.

Also, Iran is too busy helping Assad and worrying about us/Israel bombing their ass in the next year than to help their scumbag friends in Iraq.

Once Iran is brought under control, assholes like you won't have anything to lie about regarding US policy in the middle east because most countries will then be normal functioning countries on the world stage, instead of what they were under Saddam, Assad and the Iranian mullahs.

Strange that we haven't heard of the massive civil war in Iraq predicted by the idiots here.......

The killing continues, but the shi'ites have realized that buying off the sunnis is good policy. However, Iraq is growing closer to Iran, and that is a fact.

what people like Jake fail to understand is that in this country we have people killing people every day for a little rock that makes them hi for 30 minutes
the media spins what happens in Iraq as it was Ws fault, but who do we blame for the 6 million violent crimes in the US last year?
Every-one I know that was in Iraq said only most just want ot feed there faimly and want no part of war nor terror, sadly Saddam, Al Qaeda and others think different
30 people killed in Iraq is front page news, yet 30 killed in the US daily is ignored
Whats the diff?
Saddam killed a million, mostly with gas according to the NY times

Iraq under Saddam Hussein was known for its severe violations of human rights.
Secret police, torture, mass murder, rape, abductions, deportations, forced disappearances, assassinations, chemical weapons, and the destruction of wetlands were some of the methods Saddam Hussein used to maintain control. The total number of deaths related to torture and murder during this period are unknown. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued regular reports of widespread imprisonment and torture.
Contents [hide]
1 Documented human rights violations 1979–2003
2 'Saddam's Dirty Dozen'
3 Number of Victims
3.1 Other atrocities
3.2 Iraq sanctions
4 See also
5 References
6 External links
Human rights in Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[JakeStarkey]

What people like JRK miss are these facts:

The killing continues in Iraq: fact.

Iran and Iraq draw more closely: fact

If we attacked Syria, you would condemn the admin: fact.

You attacked the admin for carefully orchestrating the overthrow of Khadaffi: fact.

If Assad attacks his neighbors, the Arab League will destroy him: fact.

Your silly far righty talking points merely point you out as the dupe and running dog of those who hate America.

what people like Jake fail to understand is that in this country we have people killing people every day for a little rock that makes them hi for 30 minutes DOES NOT RELATE TO THE PREMISE
the media spins what happens in Iraq as it was Ws fault, but who do we blame for the 6 million violent crimes in the US last year? DOES NOT RELATE TO THE PREMISE
Every-one I know that was in Iraq said only most just want ot feed there faimly and want no part of war nor terror, sadly Saddam, Al Qaeda and others think different
30 people killed in Iraq is front page news, yet 30 killed in the US daily is ignored Legally belonged to the domain of the UN, not the US
Whats the diff? DOES NOT RELATE TO THE PREMISE
Saddam killed a million, mostly with gas according to the NY times DOES NOT RELATE TO THE PREMISE

Iraq under Saddam Hussein was known for its severe violations of human rights.
Secret police, torture, mass murder, rape, abductions, deportations, forced disappearances, assassinations, chemical weapons, and the destruction of wetlands were some of the methods Saddam Hussein used to maintain control. The total number of deaths related to torture and murder during this period are unknown. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International issued regular reports of widespread imprisonment and torture. DOES NOT RELATE TO THE PREMISE
Contents [hide]
1 Documented human rights violations 1979–2003 Legally belonged to the domain of the UN, not the US
2 'Saddam's Dirty Dozen' Legally belonged to the domain of the UN, not the US
3 Number of Victims Legally belonged to the domain of the UN, not the US
3.1 Other atrocities Legally belonged to the domain of the UN, not the US
3.2 Iraq sanctions Legally belonged to the domain of the UN, not the US
4 See also References External links Human rights in Saddam Hussein's Iraq - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[JakeStarkey]

JRK would jump on Obama and the admin either way if the USA did or did not attack Syria.

You have no credit, JRK, none.