Why Trump is such a loser

Astrostar

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2017
2,938
3,841
1,940
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
He's a billionaire, the most powerful person in the world and he's boinking Melania. Now tell us a little bit about yourself.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
KissBooBoo.jpg
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.

Neither your cite nor your post contain anything of substance.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.

If you believe everything you just posted, you must feel terrible that he is still far superior to anything the left has to offer. You poor snowflake.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
It's not his decision. Trump can send him packing anytime he wants.

Thread fail.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.

Or, he went into it not realizing just how loyal and willing to act unconstitutionally people from the last administration were to the boy resident.
Can't blame him for that.
I knew that the last admin was fraught with POS people - he probably didn't pay as close of attention as he was busy being a TV star, and Billionaire .
 
No the real question is why are you TRUMP haters such ANTI AMERICAN C...TS

upload_2019-11-7_11-28-10.png
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
He's a billionaire, the most powerful person in the world and he's boinking Melania. Now tell us a little bit about yourself.
Yeah, that was pretty funny. The left, with every attack, ends up with egg of their faces. They don't even see THEIR failures
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.


If Mr. Vindman is a career civil servant, he might not be able to be removed from office. But he doesn't have the trust of the President, he can certainly be shuffled off to an office in Silver Spring to report each day and be given nothing to do, totally ignored until his retirement.

But believe me, Vindman's loyalty or lack thereof to the country was well known long before this week by his President. Trump is no stupid ass, or dummkodf as they say in his native Germany. Trump is not surprised or unprepared for this at all.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
Gen Flynn was committing crimes.... a foreign agent for Turkey without disclosing it, and perjury... among other nefarious things.

This Lt. Colonel did nothing but honor his oath of office, to the Constitution of the United States.

There is a difference imo.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
Gen Flynn was committing crimes.... a foreign agent for Turkey without disclosing it, and perjury... among other nefarious things.

This Lt. Colonel did nothing but honor his oath of office, to the Constitution of the United States.

There is a difference imo.

flynn & crimes . lmfao . He WOULD NOT BETRAY HIS COUNTRY HE FAILED FK FACE OBAMA'S FK AMERICA OVER TEST YOU FOOL.......

JUST AS CROOKED AS THIS POS GOING N
JURY IN ROGER STONE TRIAL PACKED WITH PRO-OBAMA, ANTI-TRUMP JURORS .
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
Gen Flynn was committing crimes.... a foreign agent for Turkey without disclosing it, and perjury... among other nefarious things.

This Lt. Colonel did nothing but honor his oath of office, to the Constitution of the United States.

There is a difference imo.

flynn & crimes . lmfao . He WOULD NOT BETRAY HIS COUNTRY HE FAILED FK FACE OBAMA'S FK AMERICA OVER TEST YOU FOOL.......

JUST AS CROOKED AS THIS POS GOING N
JURY IN ROGER STONE TRIAL PACKED WITH PRO-OBAMA, ANTI-TRUMP JURORS .
I only know of 1 juror, that Is not PACKED. .. by any means...

Do you think there is 1 juror that loves Trump, as part of the 12?

Remember, it takes 12 jurors to convict.

And only 1 juror, for a mistrial.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
Gen Flynn was committing crimes.... a foreign agent for Turkey without disclosing it, and perjury... among other nefarious things.

This Lt. Colonel did nothing but honor his oath of office, to the Constitution of the United States.

There is a difference imo.


There may have been retaliation against General Flynn, because of Flynn's son. The junior Flynn was a Whistleblower on the Pizzagate scandal that the liberals suppressed rather than have it discussed during the 2016 debate.

The Whistleblower statute needs to be invoked here against Mueller and Comey IMHO.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
Gen Flynn was committing crimes.... a foreign agent for Turkey without disclosing it, and perjury... among other nefarious things.

This Lt. Colonel did nothing but honor his oath of office, to the Constitution of the United States.

There is a difference imo.


There may have been retaliation against General Flynn, because of Flynn's son. The junior Flynn was a Whistleblower on the Pizzagate scandal that the liberals suppressed rather than have it discussed during the 2016 debate.

The Whistleblower statute needs to be invoked here against Mueller and Comey IMHO.
Pizzagate was not real Polish, it was ALL made up, and original first post on it was started by Russian propagandists. You, and many others were duped.
 
Alexander Vindman, top Ukraine expert, has no intention of leaving - CNNPolitics

This is such a perfect example of Trump's gross, aggressive unfitness for office. Trump disparages a career military man, who has served with distinction, simply because he reported to his superior that he felt Trump's ill conceived Ukraine phone call was a national security issue. He did so out of loyalty to America, out of honesty and to uphold the oath that he took when he entered he military. And, Trump has never served one day.

Trump obviously doesn't understand the Constitution, and I bet 10 to 1 that he has never even read it. If he did, he would see that NOWHERE in the Constitution are the words "loyalty to the President." No federal employee, or military member, or aide or daughter or son-in-law is required by the Constitution of the United States to give loyalty to Trump. He just doesn't get it. Either because he chooses not to or because he is too stupid to recognize reality.

He went into office demanding and expecting loyalty. Well, he is dead wrong, and it's costing him dearly.
Yet cnn had no problem disparaging Gen Flynn, did they?
Gen Flynn was committing crimes.... a foreign agent for Turkey without disclosing it, and perjury... among other nefarious things.

This Lt. Colonel did nothing but honor his oath of office, to the Constitution of the United States.

There is a difference imo.


There may have been retaliation against General Flynn, because of Flynn's son. The junior Flynn was a Whistleblower on the Pizzagate scandal that the liberals suppressed rather than have it discussed during the 2016 debate.

The Whistleblower statute needs to be invoked here against Mueller and Comey IMHO.
Pizzagate was not real Polish, it was ALL made up, and original first post on it was started by Russian propagandists. You, and many others were duped.

I know liberals did indeed deny the serious Pizzagate allegations, but they did not do it under oath, there was never a Special Prosecutor appointed, and none of the principals were interrogated. Even assuming that it wasn't true, doesn't mean that we couldn't have receive Obstruction and Perjury charges against the principals in the kind of investigation that this kind of whistle blowing calls for.
 

Forum List

Back
Top