Why Time’s Trump cover is a subversive work of (jewish) political art

[Octoldit]

Using the photo of such a beautiful women is not helpful to you all, and it's clear the race baiting you are putting forth is for the Zionist.

 

[The Great Goose]

You leave Ivanka out of this

 

[Care4all]

fyi-Trump's/Drumpf's heritage on his father's side, could be Jewish, I read not long ago...?

 

[GLASNOST]

Actually, Time's Trump cover is a subversive work of (Christian) political art.
The subliminal aspect of mind manipulation is key to understanding how people are brainwashed without them knowing why they believe the things they believe.

The Nazi Christian Josef Göbbels confirms that he was really all about manipulating people, not informing them.

 

[GLASNOST]

fyi-Trump's/Drumpf's heritage on his father's side, could be Jewish, I read not long ago...?

Everyone’s heritage is Jewish. Yours, mine, Trump’s, everyone’s. You don’t really think that Christianity just fell out of the sky one day, do you? Christianity is to Judaism as Protestantism is to Catholicism … and they are all (including Islam) fundamentally built upon Judaism.

 

[The Great Goose]

Actually, Time's Trump cover is a subversive work of (Christian) political art.
The subliminal aspect of mind manipulation is key to understanding how people are brainwashed without them knowing why they believe the things they believe.

The Nazi Christian Josef Göbbels confirms that he was really all about manipulating people, not informing them.

You seem to have unwittingly entwined with my direction here. Octoldit is expressing his frustration on how most people don't have it in them to be informed, and therein lies the problem.

The top Nazis suffered digestive problems, quite acutely. I believe this was caused by the stress of holding an entire population swayed to their will. Goebbels, though cynical, was actually correct in his assumption that there was no other way. You can't reason with most people. You can only indoctrinate. We've seen the far left doing it for decades, and it works.

A lot of fascists are pseudo intellectuals. They are not stupid people, but they fail in that they are not Goebbels. They think that they can reason with people.

The far left, on the other hand, is very like Goebbels, they never seek to reason but always bully instead. I don't get on with them because I'm a natural reasoner, but I'm also spectacularly useless to them because of this as well.

 

[GLASNOST]

You seem to have unwittingly entwined with my direction here. Octoldit is expressing his frustration on how most people don't have it in them to be informed, and therein lies the problem.
The top Nazis suffered digestive problems, quite acutely. I believe this was caused by the stress of holding an entire population swayed to their will. Goebbels, though cynical, was actually correct in his assumption that there was no other way. You can't reason with most people. You can only indoctrinate. We've seen the far left doing it for decades, and it works.
A lot of fascists are pseudo intellectuals. They are not stupid people, but they fail in that they are not Goebbels. They think that they can reason with people.
The far left, on the other hand, is very like Goebbels, they never seek to reason but always bully instead. I don't get on with them because I'm a natural reasoner, but I'm also spectacularly useless to them because of this as well.

I don’t appreciate your use of the expression “far left”. I’m sure you don’t know what it means, you’ve never seen one, you’ve never even seen it in operation, and I have no doubt you’d be unable to define it in a way that would fit your own personal criteria. In addition to that I really don’t know why you single out anyone in any ‘left’-ish direction to the exclusion of anything ‘right’ as it might be relevant to the subject of indoctrination. In short, your introduction of “far left” means absolutely nothing, yet you think it is an important demarcation.

 

[The Great Goose]

You seem to have unwittingly entwined with my direction here. Octoldit is expressing his frustration on how most people don't have it in them to be informed, and therein lies the problem.
The top Nazis suffered digestive problems, quite acutely. I believe this was caused by the stress of holding an entire population swayed to their will. Goebbels, though cynical, was actually correct in his assumption that there was no other way. You can't reason with most people. You can only indoctrinate. We've seen the far left doing it for decades, and it works.
A lot of fascists are pseudo intellectuals. They are not stupid people, but they fail in that they are not Goebbels. They think that they can reason with people.
The far left, on the other hand, is very like Goebbels, they never seek to reason but always bully instead. I don't get on with them because I'm a natural reasoner, but I'm also spectacularly useless to them because of this as well.

I don’t appreciate your use of the expression “far left”. I’m sure you don’t know what it means, you’ve never seen one, you’ve never even seen it in operation, and I have no doubt you’d be unable to define it in a way that would fit your own personal criteria. In addition to that I really don’t know why you single out anyone in any ‘left’-ish direction to the exclusion of anything ‘right’ as it might be relevant to the subject of indoctrination. In short, your introduction of “far left” means absolutely nothing, yet you think it is an important demarcation.

I'm talking about looney lefties, people like the idiot that harassed Ivanka on the plane and the idiots who harassed Nigel Farage when he would take his family out to dinner.

They are very common on university staff and many are permanent students.

 

[teapartysamurai]

HAARETZ – Time Magazine’s annual “Person of the Year” announcement is, year after year, grossly misunderstood. Time Magazine is clear on its sole criterion – “the person who had the greatest influence, for better or worse, on the events of the year” – yet, do a simple search on Twitter and you will find countless people who seem to think that the “Person of the Year” selection is tantamount to an endorsement. Previous winners have included Joseph Stalin (1939, 1942), Ayatollah Khomeini (1979), Adolf Hitler (1938), and other figures who I think it is safe to assume the Time staff does not endorse.

This year, it should come as no surprise that President-elect Donald Trump was chosen to grace the cover of Time’s annual issue (shot by Jewish photographer Nadav Kander). “For better or worse,” Trump, during his campaign and now after his election, has certainly been among the greatest influences on the events of the year. For clues as to how Time feels about that question – is it “for better or worse?” – we can look to the image chosen for the cover of the issue.
The decisions that Time made regarding how to photograph Trump reveal a layered, nuanced field of references that place the image among, in this viewer’s opinion, the magazine’s greatest covers.
In order to deconstruct the image, let’s focus on three key elements (leaving aside the placement of the ‘M’ in ‘Time’ that makes it look like Trump has red horns): the color, the pose, and the chair.
THE COLOR
Notice how the colors appear slightly washed out, slightly muted, soft. The palette creates what we might call a vintage effect. The image’s sharpness and detail reveal the contemporaneity of the picture, but the color suggests an older type of film, namely, Kodachrome. Kodachrome, the recently discontinued film produced by Kodak, was designed to create accurate color reproduction in the early 1900s. It was immensely popular between the late 30s and 70s, and its distinctive look defines our common visual concept of nostalgia.
By reproducing a Kodachrome color palette, the Time cover makes us reimagine the cover as if it were an image from the era of Kodachrome’s mass popularity. (Where your mind goes when thinking about leaders from the era of World War Two, segregation, and the Cold War era is up to you.) This visual-temporal shift in a sense mirrors a lot of the drives that fueled Trump’s rise.
Trump ran a campaign based on regressive policies and attitudes – anti-environmental protection, anti-abortion, pro-coal, etc. This election was not just about regressive policy choices, but also about traditional values (defined primarily by the Christian right), about nostalgia for American greatness and security, about nostalgia for a pre-globalized world.

COMPLETE ARTICLE LINK: Why Time’s Trump cover is a subversive work of (jewish) political art

Oh good grief, please some mod send this to the rubber room soon.

Zeig Heil, dude!

 

[Octoldit]

HAARETZ – Time Magazine’s annual “Person of the Year” announcement is, year after year, grossly misunderstood. Time Magazine is clear on its sole criterion – “the person who had the greatest influence, for better or worse, on the events of the year” – yet, do a simple search on Twitter and you will find countless people who seem to think that the “Person of the Year” selection is tantamount to an endorsement. Previous winners have included Joseph Stalin (1939, 1942), Ayatollah Khomeini (1979), Adolf Hitler (1938), and other figures who I think it is safe to assume the Time staff does not endorse.

This year, it should come as no surprise that President-elect Donald Trump was chosen to grace the cover of Time’s annual issue (shot by Jewish photographer Nadav Kander). “For better or worse,” Trump, during his campaign and now after his election, has certainly been among the greatest influences on the events of the year. For clues as to how Time feels about that question – is it “for better or worse?” – we can look to the image chosen for the cover of the issue.
The decisions that Time made regarding how to photograph Trump reveal a layered, nuanced field of references that place the image among, in this viewer’s opinion, the magazine’s greatest covers.
In order to deconstruct the image, let’s focus on three key elements (leaving aside the placement of the ‘M’ in ‘Time’ that makes it look like Trump has red horns): the color, the pose, and the chair.
THE COLOR
Notice how the colors appear slightly washed out, slightly muted, soft. The palette creates what we might call a vintage effect. The image’s sharpness and detail reveal the contemporaneity of the picture, but the color suggests an older type of film, namely, Kodachrome. Kodachrome, the recently discontinued film produced by Kodak, was designed to create accurate color reproduction in the early 1900s. It was immensely popular between the late 30s and 70s, and its distinctive look defines our common visual concept of nostalgia.
By reproducing a Kodachrome color palette, the Time cover makes us reimagine the cover as if it were an image from the era of Kodachrome’s mass popularity. (Where your mind goes when thinking about leaders from the era of World War Two, segregation, and the Cold War era is up to you.) This visual-temporal shift in a sense mirrors a lot of the drives that fueled Trump’s rise.
Trump ran a campaign based on regressive policies and attitudes – anti-environmental protection, anti-abortion, pro-coal, etc. This election was not just about regressive policy choices, but also about traditional values (defined primarily by the Christian right), about nostalgia for American greatness and security, about nostalgia for a pre-globalized world.

COMPLETE ARTICLE LINK: Why Time’s Trump cover is a subversive work of (jewish) political art

Oh good grief, please some mod send this to the rubber room soon.

Zeig Heil, dude!

Rubber Room?

Is that your solution for articles touching on the subliminal secrets of brainwash and mind control?

It would really be a terrible blow to the mission of the media if it's victims were aware some of the subconscious factors that brainwash without them even realizing it.

Brainwash is far more effective than most people want to admit.

When millions of young people vote for a socialist, and sees a socialist as someone with the solution to a nations problems brainwash has reached heights far beyond that which even a communist could imagine.

Maybe this is why communist china is showing so much interest in Hollywood.

Wonder has it even entered the minds of those who voted for Bernie Sanders to ask him to explain to them how a loaf of bread has to be paid for with many thousands in paper currency as in Venezuela?

Ask Bernie if the socialist system he is backing is really about reducing the America economy to that of the economy of Venezuela?

Sure he would not answer to question and continue his lying.

How could so many people be interested in Hillary knowing a third World War would take place if she was turned loose on the White House?

"It’s media brainwash much of it subliminal", and the Time Magazine news article posted on this message board only scratches the surface of this very serious issue.

A article such as this being nominated for censorship in the rubber room means brainwashed cult members are working to try and make America a communist country!

 

[LuckyDuck]

HAARETZ – Time Magazine’s annual “Person of the Year” announcement is, year after year, grossly misunderstood. Time Magazine is clear on its sole criterion – “the person who had the greatest influence, for better or worse, on the events of the year” – yet, do a simple search on Twitter and you will find countless people who seem to think that the “Person of the Year” selection is tantamount to an endorsement. Previous winners have included Joseph Stalin (1939, 1942), Ayatollah Khomeini (1979), Adolf Hitler (1938), and other figures who I think it is safe to assume the Time staff does not endorse.

This year, it should come as no surprise that President-elect Donald Trump was chosen to grace the cover of Time’s annual issue (shot by Jewish photographer Nadav Kander). “For better or worse,” Trump, during his campaign and now after his election, has certainly been among the greatest influences on the events of the year. For clues as to how Time feels about that question – is it “for better or worse?” – we can look to the image chosen for the cover of the issue.
The decisions that Time made regarding how to photograph Trump reveal a layered, nuanced field of references that place the image among, in this viewer’s opinion, the magazine’s greatest covers.
In order to deconstruct the image, let’s focus on three key elements (leaving aside the placement of the ‘M’ in ‘Time’ that makes it look like Trump has red horns): the color, the pose, and the chair.
THE COLOR
Notice how the colors appear slightly washed out, slightly muted, soft. The palette creates what we might call a vintage effect. The image’s sharpness and detail reveal the contemporaneity of the picture, but the color suggests an older type of film, namely, Kodachrome. Kodachrome, the recently discontinued film produced by Kodak, was designed to create accurate color reproduction in the early 1900s. It was immensely popular between the late 30s and 70s, and its distinctive look defines our common visual concept of nostalgia.
By reproducing a Kodachrome color palette, the Time cover makes us reimagine the cover as if it were an image from the era of Kodachrome’s mass popularity. (Where your mind goes when thinking about leaders from the era of World War Two, segregation, and the Cold War era is up to you.) This visual-temporal shift in a sense mirrors a lot of the drives that fueled Trump’s rise.
Trump ran a campaign based on regressive policies and attitudes – anti-environmental protection, anti-abortion, pro-coal, etc. This election was not just about regressive policy choices, but also about traditional values (defined primarily by the Christian right), about nostalgia for American greatness and security, about nostalgia for a pre-globalized world.

COMPLETE ARTICLE LINK: Why Time’s Trump cover is a subversive work of (jewish) political art

Either get back on or, get off your medication.

 

[teapartysamurai]

HAARETZ – Time Magazine’s annual “Person of the Year” announcement is, year after year, grossly misunderstood. Time Magazine is clear on its sole criterion – “the person who had the greatest influence, for better or worse, on the events of the year” – yet, do a simple search on Twitter and you will find countless people who seem to think that the “Person of the Year” selection is tantamount to an endorsement. Previous winners have included Joseph Stalin (1939, 1942), Ayatollah Khomeini (1979), Adolf Hitler (1938), and other figures who I think it is safe to assume the Time staff does not endorse.

This year, it should come as no surprise that President-elect Donald Trump was chosen to grace the cover of Time’s annual issue (shot by Jewish photographer Nadav Kander). “For better or worse,” Trump, during his campaign and now after his election, has certainly been among the greatest influences on the events of the year. For clues as to how Time feels about that question – is it “for better or worse?” – we can look to the image chosen for the cover of the issue.
The decisions that Time made regarding how to photograph Trump reveal a layered, nuanced field of references that place the image among, in this viewer’s opinion, the magazine’s greatest covers.
In order to deconstruct the image, let’s focus on three key elements (leaving aside the placement of the ‘M’ in ‘Time’ that makes it look like Trump has red horns): the color, the pose, and the chair.
THE COLOR
Notice how the colors appear slightly washed out, slightly muted, soft. The palette creates what we might call a vintage effect. The image’s sharpness and detail reveal the contemporaneity of the picture, but the color suggests an older type of film, namely, Kodachrome. Kodachrome, the recently discontinued film produced by Kodak, was designed to create accurate color reproduction in the early 1900s. It was immensely popular between the late 30s and 70s, and its distinctive look defines our common visual concept of nostalgia.
By reproducing a Kodachrome color palette, the Time cover makes us reimagine the cover as if it were an image from the era of Kodachrome’s mass popularity. (Where your mind goes when thinking about leaders from the era of World War Two, segregation, and the Cold War era is up to you.) This visual-temporal shift in a sense mirrors a lot of the drives that fueled Trump’s rise.
Trump ran a campaign based on regressive policies and attitudes – anti-environmental protection, anti-abortion, pro-coal, etc. This election was not just about regressive policy choices, but also about traditional values (defined primarily by the Christian right), about nostalgia for American greatness and security, about nostalgia for a pre-globalized world.

COMPLETE ARTICLE LINK: Why Time’s Trump cover is a subversive work of (jewish) political art

Oh good grief, please some mod send this to the rubber room soon.

Zeig Heil, dude!

Rubber Room?

Is that your solution for articles touching on the subliminal secrets of brainwash and mind control?

It would really be a terrible blow to the mission of the media if it's victims were aware some of the subconscious factors that brainwash without them even realizing it.

Brainwash is far more effective than most people want to admit.

When millions of young people vote for a socialist, and sees a socialist as someone with the solution to a nations problems brainwash has reached heights far beyond that which even a communist could imagine.

Maybe this is why communist china is showing so much interest in Hollywood.

Wonder has it even entered the minds of those who voted for Bernie Sanders to ask him to explain to them how a loaf of bread has to be paid for with many thousands in paper currency as in Venezuela?

Ask Bernie if the socialist system he is backing is really about reducing the America economy to that of the economy of Venezuela?

Sure he would not answer to question and continue his lying.

How could so many people be interested in Hillary knowing a third World War would take place if she was turned loose on the White House?

"It’s media brainwash much of it subliminal", and the Time Magazine news article posted on this message board only scratches the surface of this very serious issue.

A article such as this being nominated for censorship in the rubber room means brainwashed cult members are working to try and make America a communist country!

It's a picture of a man sitting in a chair, looking over his shoulder. As Freud famously said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.