Why the television networks CANCELED the WAR ON IRAQ

Psychoblues

Senior Member
Nov 30, 2003
2,701
142
48
North Missisippi
Referring to a report that Iraq coverage on the three major network evening newscasts dropped 60 percent since 2003, New York Times columnist Frank Rich argues that the war has been "canceled" partly because the American viewing audience may not have the "stomach to watch" such a "big, nightmarish story" that has garnered the "specter of defeat," and which "lacks the thread of a coherent plot," RAW STORY has found.

Excerpts from Rich's Sunday column in the Times:

#
As America fell into the quagmire of Vietnam, the comedian Milton Berle joked that the fastest way to end the war would be to put it on the last-place network, ABC, where it was certain to be canceled. Berle's gallows humor lives on in the quagmire in Iraq. Americans want this war canceled too, and first- and last-place networks alike are more than happy to oblige.

CNN will surely remind us on Sunday that it is Day 19 of the Israel-Hezbollah war -- now branded as Crisis in the Middle East -- but you won't catch anyone saying it's Day 1,229 of the war in Iraq. On the Big Three networks' evening newscasts, the time devoted to Iraq has fallen 60 percent between 2003 and this spring, as clocked by the television monitor, the Tyndall Report. On Thursday, Brian Williams of NBC read aloud a "shame on you" e-mail complaint from the parents of two military sons anguished that his broadcast had so little news about the war.

....

The specter of defeat is not the only reason Americans have switched off Iraq. The larger issue is that we don't know what we -- or, more specifically, 135,000 brave and vulnerable American troops -- are fighting for. In contrast to the Israel-Hezbollah war, where the stakes for the combatants and American interests are clear, the war in Iraq has no rationale to keep it afloat on television or anywhere else. It's a big, nightmarish story, all right, but one that lacks the thread of a coherent plot.

....

That the latest American plan for victory is to reposition our forces by putting more of them in the crossfire of Baghdad's civil war is tantamount to treating our troops as if they were deck chairs on the Titanic. Even if the networks led with the story every night, what Americans would have the stomach to watch?

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Frank_Rich_Network_helping_to_cancel_0729.html


Don't that make you piss down your leg?


Psychoblues
 
Psychoblues said:
Referring to a report that Iraq coverage on the three major network evening newscasts dropped 60 percent since 2003, New York Times columnist Frank Rich argues that the war has been "canceled" partly because the American viewing audience may not have the "stomach to watch" such a "big, nightmarish story" that has garnered the "specter of defeat," and which "lacks the thread of a coherent plot," RAW STORY has found.

Excerpts from Rich's Sunday column in the Times:

#
As America fell into the quagmire of Vietnam, the comedian Milton Berle joked that the fastest way to end the war would be to put it on the last-place network, ABC, where it was certain to be canceled. Berle's gallows humor lives on in the quagmire in Iraq. Americans want this war canceled too, and first- and last-place networks alike are more than happy to oblige.

CNN will surely remind us on Sunday that it is Day 19 of the Israel-Hezbollah war -- now branded as Crisis in the Middle East -- but you won't catch anyone saying it's Day 1,229 of the war in Iraq. On the Big Three networks' evening newscasts, the time devoted to Iraq has fallen 60 percent between 2003 and this spring, as clocked by the television monitor, the Tyndall Report. On Thursday, Brian Williams of NBC read aloud a "shame on you" e-mail complaint from the parents of two military sons anguished that his broadcast had so little news about the war.

....

The specter of defeat is not the only reason Americans have switched off Iraq. The larger issue is that we don't know what we -- or, more specifically, 135,000 brave and vulnerable American troops -- are fighting for. In contrast to the Israel-Hezbollah war, where the stakes for the combatants and American interests are clear, the war in Iraq has no rationale to keep it afloat on television or anywhere else. It's a big, nightmarish story, all right, but one that lacks the thread of a coherent plot.

....

That the latest American plan for victory is to reposition our forces by putting more of them in the crossfire of Baghdad's civil war is tantamount to treating our troops as if they were deck chairs on the Titanic. Even if the networks led with the story every night, what Americans would have the stomach to watch?

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Frank_Rich_Network_helping_to_cancel_0729.html


Don't that make you piss down your leg?


Psychoblues

Naaaa---I'm used to the screwed up perception of the money media. I would expect nothing less from them.
 
I can't disagree with you on the perception of the "money media". But, Frank Rich wrote this as an independent. You still pissing down your leg?:)


Psychoblues



dilloduck said:
Naaaa---I'm used to the screwed up perception of the money media. I would expect nothing less from them.
 
Psychoblues said:
I can't disagree with you on the perception of the "money media". But, Frank Rich wrote this as an independent. You still pissing down your leg?:)


Psychoblues

Maybe if Iraq isn't on center stage something can be accomplished without everyone having to spout out some obscure criticism.
 
Things ain't just ducky in Iraq, dilloduck. But, there are Americans dying there for no good cause. There are American values and principles being shat upon by the present administration as they spend the so-called political capital they envision themselves as having "earned". There will not be anything more accomplished in Iraq as a result of the media desision to cast their cameras and stories elsewhere. What dimension are you living in? Too obscure for you? Get an education is all I can suggest.


Psychoblues



dilloduck said:
Maybe if Iraq isn't on center stage something can be accomplished without everyone having to spout out some obscure criticism.
 
Psychoblues said:
Things ain't just ducky in Iraq, dilloduck. But, there are Americans dying there for no good cause. There are American values and principles being shat upon by the present administration as they spend the so-called political capital they envision themselves as having "earned". There will not be anything more accomplished in Iraq as a result of the media desision to cast their cameras and stories elsewhere. What dimension are you living in? Too obscure for you? Get an education is all I can suggest.


Psychoblues


will do, psycho !
 

Forum List

Back
Top