Why the need for Senate impeachment witnesses is invalid.

It's true. We know what the Shakedown was, who did it, how and why it was done. Trumpybears' own word tell us that he wanted multiple foreign countries to investigate his political rivals.

Trumpublicans want a quick show trial to try and shore up to their dwindling base. Dems will keep investigating and releasing more and more information to the public.

Have fun kids.
To actually have a shakedown (as you put it) both parties have to understand that there is something one sides wants and the other side has to understand that if that want is not meant that there will be a consequence. Trump never tied anything to his request. Zelinsky did not know there was a consequence of not doing as Trump requested. The aid was released without any investigation or announcement.
The aid was more then was threatened to be held up by Biden.

You claim on his political rival. So then Biden has actually been chosen as the democrat presidential candidate?

The Ukrainians knew the aid was being held up in July.

The entire Democrat party as well as all our Intelligence Agency's were also being targeted with the whole Crowdstrike DNC Server in the Ukraine claim.
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.
 
The House is suppose to present the facts of the impeachment.
Why didn't they call witnesses for Trump in the House?
Simple answer and not many people are given the FACTS which is the fault of the GOP especially.
The Executive branch has a RIGHT to take the House witness requests to SCOTUS.
But the Democrats didn't want to have this go to SCOTUS for one reason. Time.
The Democrats wanted to speed up the impeachment process and since they had the majority in the house
there was no need.
So now the Senate does NOT need any more witnesses.
The real reason is that if they had a real inquiry with witnesses from both sides testifying the impeachment would have been shot down.
 
The evidence in their file sent to the Senate contained all the evidence they needed to find Trump guilty for impeachment. Remember Nancy's "Forever Impeached?" So why now the need to bring forth more witnesses? Are the Dems admitting their case is full of holes?
The Dems were stonewalled by a corrupt POTUS. Even his lawyer admits as much.

Alan Dershowitz called Trump corrupt in 2016 and said he could be corrupt as President - CNNPolitics

And as part of Trump's delaying tactics if the House had called Bolton,et.al. then the Executive branch would claim executive privilege.
At that point then the House would have taken the Executive branch to SCOTUS to determine "Executive privilege" was legal.
BUT the Democrats were anxious to get this done BEFORE the 2020 elections. Knowing that the general public would be very
disgusted by the waste of time and these same Democrats would be voted out of the majority in the House.
Bye bye impeachment!

Trump has not claimed executive privilege on anything regarding the impeachment inquiry yet, even for the people that were subpoenaed. The Trump administration could drag this out in court for years. Once this Congress ends next Jan, the subpoena's disappear.

Trump's lawyers are alleging that the court case could be settled by then, but Trump's other lawyers are in court delaying these rulings to the greatest degree possible.

This is not a way for a country to be run.
Part of the problem lies in the fact that Pelosi never actually held a vote on wether to begin impeachment proceedings before they actually began.

What is that a problem? Standing House committees have subpoena power. Subpoenas were ignored even after the vote was held.
They don't have standing to conduct impeachment inquiries, moron. What subpoenas were issued after the vote was held?
 
The House is suppose to present the facts of the impeachment.
Why didn't they call witnesses for Trump in the House?
Simple answer and not many people are given the FACTS which is the fault of the GOP especially.
The Executive branch has a RIGHT to take the House witness requests to SCOTUS.
But the Democrats didn't want to have this go to SCOTUS for one reason. Time.
The Democrats wanted to speed up the impeachment process and since they had the majority in the house
there was no need.
So now the Senate does NOT need any more witnesses.

I missed where you got your PhD in constitutional law?
 
The Dems were stonewalled by a corrupt POTUS. Even his lawyer admits as much.

Alan Dershowitz called Trump corrupt in 2016 and said he could be corrupt as President - CNNPolitics

And as part of Trump's delaying tactics if the House had called Bolton,et.al. then the Executive branch would claim executive privilege.
At that point then the House would have taken the Executive branch to SCOTUS to determine "Executive privilege" was legal.
BUT the Democrats were anxious to get this done BEFORE the 2020 elections. Knowing that the general public would be very
disgusted by the waste of time and these same Democrats would be voted out of the majority in the House.
Bye bye impeachment!

Trump has not claimed executive privilege on anything regarding the impeachment inquiry yet, even for the people that were subpoenaed. The Trump administration could drag this out in court for years. Once this Congress ends next Jan, the subpoena's disappear.

Trump's lawyers are alleging that the court case could be settled by then, but Trump's other lawyers are in court delaying these rulings to the greatest degree possible.

This is not a way for a country to be run.
Part of the problem lies in the fact that Pelosi never actually held a vote on wether to begin impeachment proceedings before they actually began.

What is that a problem? Standing House committees have subpoena power. Subpoenas were ignored even after the vote was held.
They don't have standing to conduct impeachment inquiries, moron. What subpoenas were issued after the vote was held?
Moron?
From an Archie bunker with a baby pic!!!
And zero college
Hilarious!!
 
And as part of Trump's delaying tactics if the House had called Bolton,et.al. then the Executive branch would claim executive privilege.
At that point then the House would have taken the Executive branch to SCOTUS to determine "Executive privilege" was legal.
BUT the Democrats were anxious to get this done BEFORE the 2020 elections. Knowing that the general public would be very
disgusted by the waste of time and these same Democrats would be voted out of the majority in the House.
Bye bye impeachment!

Trump has not claimed executive privilege on anything regarding the impeachment inquiry yet, even for the people that were subpoenaed. The Trump administration could drag this out in court for years. Once this Congress ends next Jan, the subpoena's disappear.

Trump's lawyers are alleging that the court case could be settled by then, but Trump's other lawyers are in court delaying these rulings to the greatest degree possible.

This is not a way for a country to be run.
Part of the problem lies in the fact that Pelosi never actually held a vote on wether to begin impeachment proceedings before they actually began.

What is that a problem? Standing House committees have subpoena power. Subpoenas were ignored even after the vote was held.
And the Democrats failed to take that matter to court...

Face it, Democrats fuck up everything they touch!!!

So what? They don't need to take it to court. They took it to impeachment.
And now they're in the Senate with nothing...

Any fool knows that you collect any evidence BEFORE the trial!!!
 
It's true. We know what the Shakedown was, who did it, how and why it was done. Trumpybears' own word tell us that he wanted multiple foreign countries to investigate his political rivals.

Trumpublicans want a quick show trial to try and shore up to their dwindling base. Dems will keep investigating and releasing more and more information to the public.

Have fun kids.
To actually have a shakedown (as you put it) both parties have to understand that there is something one sides wants and the other side has to understand that if that want is not meant that there will be a consequence. Trump never tied anything to his request. Zelinsky did not know there was a consequence of not doing as Trump requested. The aid was released without any investigation or announcement.
The aid was more then was threatened to be held up by Biden.

You claim on his political rival. So then Biden has actually been chosen as the democrat presidential candidate?

The Ukrainians knew the aid was being held up in July.

The entire Democrat party as well as all our Intelligence Agency's were also being targeted with the whole Crowdstrike DNC Server in the Ukraine claim.
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.


Ukraine officials knew about hold on aid earlier than reported

"A senior U.S. Department of Defense official testified on Wednesday that Ukrainian officials knew President Donald Trump’s administration was withholding military assistance in July, undercutting a key Republican defense of the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry."
 
It's true. We know what the Shakedown was, who did it, how and why it was done. Trumpybears' own word tell us that he wanted multiple foreign countries to investigate his political rivals.

Trumpublicans want a quick show trial to try and shore up to their dwindling base. Dems will keep investigating and releasing more and more information to the public.

Have fun kids.
To actually have a shakedown (as you put it) both parties have to understand that there is something one sides wants and the other side has to understand that if that want is not meant that there will be a consequence. Trump never tied anything to his request. Zelinsky did not know there was a consequence of not doing as Trump requested. The aid was released without any investigation or announcement.
The aid was more then was threatened to be held up by Biden.

You claim on his political rival. So then Biden has actually been chosen as the democrat presidential candidate?

The Ukrainians knew the aid was being held up in July.

The entire Democrat party as well as all our Intelligence Agency's were also being targeted with the whole Crowdstrike DNC Server in the Ukraine claim.
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.


Ukraine officials knew about hold on aid earlier than reported

"A senior U.S. Department of Defense official testified on Wednesday that Ukrainian officials knew President Donald Trump’s administration was withholding military assistance in July, undercutting a key Republican defense of the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry."
So then Zelinsky was covering for Trump and therefore can not be trusted with the aid that was sent. So thank you for proving that the Dems and the left has been lieing all along. Not only does everyone hate Trump but the Ukraine is still corrupt enough they should never have gotten the aid.
 
It's true. We know what the Shakedown was, who did it, how and why it was done. Trumpybears' own word tell us that he wanted multiple foreign countries to investigate his political rivals.

Trumpublicans want a quick show trial to try and shore up to their dwindling base. Dems will keep investigating and releasing more and more information to the public.

Have fun kids.
To actually have a shakedown (as you put it) both parties have to understand that there is something one sides wants and the other side has to understand that if that want is not meant that there will be a consequence. Trump never tied anything to his request. Zelinsky did not know there was a consequence of not doing as Trump requested. The aid was released without any investigation or announcement.
The aid was more then was threatened to be held up by Biden.

You claim on his political rival. So then Biden has actually been chosen as the democrat presidential candidate?

The Ukrainians knew the aid was being held up in July.

The entire Democrat party as well as all our Intelligence Agency's were also being targeted with the whole Crowdstrike DNC Server in the Ukraine claim.
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.


Ukraine officials knew about hold on aid earlier than reported

"A senior U.S. Department of Defense official testified on Wednesday that Ukrainian officials knew President Donald Trump’s administration was withholding military assistance in July, undercutting a key Republican defense of the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry."
So then Zelinsky was covering for Trump and therefore can not be trusted with the aid that was sent. So thank you for proving that the Dems and the left has been lieing all along. Not only does everyone hate Trump but the Ukraine is still corrupt enough they should never have gotten the aid.

Why does that mean him was covering for Trumpybear? I think most people can appreciate the awkward position he was put in as the Trumpybear tried to box him in. Trying to not piss off the Bear while not giving in to the pressure to announce those politically motivated investigations must have been hard. I bet the Grumpybear hates the poor young Zelinsky for not complying sooner.
 
And as part of Trump's delaying tactics if the House had called Bolton,et.al. then the Executive branch would claim executive privilege.
At that point then the House would have taken the Executive branch to SCOTUS to determine "Executive privilege" was legal.
BUT the Democrats were anxious to get this done BEFORE the 2020 elections. Knowing that the general public would be very
disgusted by the waste of time and these same Democrats would be voted out of the majority in the House.
Bye bye impeachment!

Trump has not claimed executive privilege on anything regarding the impeachment inquiry yet, even for the people that were subpoenaed. The Trump administration could drag this out in court for years. Once this Congress ends next Jan, the subpoena's disappear.

Trump's lawyers are alleging that the court case could be settled by then, but Trump's other lawyers are in court delaying these rulings to the greatest degree possible.

This is not a way for a country to be run.
Part of the problem lies in the fact that Pelosi never actually held a vote on wether to begin impeachment proceedings before they actually began.

What is that a problem? Standing House committees have subpoena power. Subpoenas were ignored even after the vote was held.
They don't have standing to conduct impeachment inquiries, moron. What subpoenas were issued after the vote was held?
Moron?
From an Archie bunker with a baby pic!!!
And zero college
Hilarious!!
You have no facts or logic, I see.
 
To actually have a shakedown (as you put it) both parties have to understand that there is something one sides wants and the other side has to understand that if that want is not meant that there will be a consequence. Trump never tied anything to his request. Zelinsky did not know there was a consequence of not doing as Trump requested. The aid was released without any investigation or announcement.
The aid was more then was threatened to be held up by Biden.

You claim on his political rival. So then Biden has actually been chosen as the democrat presidential candidate?

The Ukrainians knew the aid was being held up in July.

The entire Democrat party as well as all our Intelligence Agency's were also being targeted with the whole Crowdstrike DNC Server in the Ukraine claim.
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.


Ukraine officials knew about hold on aid earlier than reported

"A senior U.S. Department of Defense official testified on Wednesday that Ukrainian officials knew President Donald Trump’s administration was withholding military assistance in July, undercutting a key Republican defense of the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry."
So then Zelinsky was covering for Trump and therefore can not be trusted with the aid that was sent. So thank you for proving that the Dems and the left has been lieing all along. Not only does everyone hate Trump but the Ukraine is still corrupt enough they should never have gotten the aid.

Why does that mean him was covering for Trumpybear? I think most people can appreciate the awkward position he was put in as the Trumpybear tried to box him in. Trying to not piss off the Bear while not giving in to the pressure to announce those politically motivated investigations must have been hard. I bet the Grumpybear hates the poor young Zelinsky for not complying sooner.
Roflol. So the guy was covering for Trump but is somehow not corrupt but to be pitied. And exactly how do you pull that off? Was his life being threatened? Was the U.S. going to invade and depose him?
According to you and others Trump could not stop the aid, it had already been approved.

I think you really need to get better material. Perhaps a juggling seal.
 
The Ukrainians knew the aid was being held up in July.

The entire Democrat party as well as all our Intelligence Agency's were also being targeted with the whole Crowdstrike DNC Server in the Ukraine claim.
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.


Ukraine officials knew about hold on aid earlier than reported

"A senior U.S. Department of Defense official testified on Wednesday that Ukrainian officials knew President Donald Trump’s administration was withholding military assistance in July, undercutting a key Republican defense of the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry."
So then Zelinsky was covering for Trump and therefore can not be trusted with the aid that was sent. So thank you for proving that the Dems and the left has been lieing all along. Not only does everyone hate Trump but the Ukraine is still corrupt enough they should never have gotten the aid.

Why does that mean him was covering for Trumpybear? I think most people can appreciate the awkward position he was put in as the Trumpybear tried to box him in. Trying to not piss off the Bear while not giving in to the pressure to announce those politically motivated investigations must have been hard. I bet the Grumpybear hates the poor young Zelinsky for not complying sooner.
Roflol. So the guy was covering for Trump but is somehow not corrupt but to be pitied. And exactly how do you pull that off? Was his life being threatened? Was the U.S. going to invade and depose him?
According to you and others Trump could not stop the aid, it had already been approved.

I think you really need to get better material. Perhaps a juggling seal.

He was the one getting strong armed. Trumpybear is still in power too. Putin-Bear has invaded the Ukraine and would like the Government in Kiev to fail and have the Ukraine fall back in line with Russia.
 
And yet Zelinsky claimed not to know or feel any pressure from the phone call.
We hear everyday from the left that the world hates Trump and wants nothing to do with him. So was he covering for Trump? Basicly lieing which means that he can't be trusted and must be corrupt. That must mean the left is lieing about everyone hating Trump.
Or was Zelinsky telling the truth and there was no shakedown which means that the left is trying to make a mountain out of nothing.

Considering the track record of the whole Russia and Mueller, Stormy Daniels and the numerous we got him now things that keep getting shot down I would say that Zelinsky did not lie and did not feel like there was a quid pro quo. Or for you that don't understand a shakedown.


Ukraine officials knew about hold on aid earlier than reported

"A senior U.S. Department of Defense official testified on Wednesday that Ukrainian officials knew President Donald Trump’s administration was withholding military assistance in July, undercutting a key Republican defense of the president’s actions in the impeachment inquiry."
So then Zelinsky was covering for Trump and therefore can not be trusted with the aid that was sent. So thank you for proving that the Dems and the left has been lieing all along. Not only does everyone hate Trump but the Ukraine is still corrupt enough they should never have gotten the aid.

Why does that mean him was covering for Trumpybear? I think most people can appreciate the awkward position he was put in as the Trumpybear tried to box him in. Trying to not piss off the Bear while not giving in to the pressure to announce those politically motivated investigations must have been hard. I bet the Grumpybear hates the poor young Zelinsky for not complying sooner.
Roflol. So the guy was covering for Trump but is somehow not corrupt but to be pitied. And exactly how do you pull that off? Was his life being threatened? Was the U.S. going to invade and depose him?
According to you and others Trump could not stop the aid, it had already been approved.

I think you really need to get better material. Perhaps a juggling seal.

He was the one getting strong armed. Trumpybear is still in power too. Putin-Bear has invaded the Ukraine and would like the Government in Kiev to fail and have the Ukraine fall back in line with Russia.
Damn you just keep digging. So last I heard he was still claiming that he felt no pressure so what is it you imagine Trump is going to do? Send somone with a baseball bat to break a couple of his legs? Sounds like you have been taken in by Schiff.
If you were so worried about Ukraine maybe you and others should have been more up in arms when 44 allowed your beloved Putin to take the Crimea and only sent blankets and such.
Russia will not fall to Russia because Trump allowed the Ukraine to get lethal arms. Putin knows that Trump will not just bow aside and let them walk in.
 
The House is suppose to present the facts of the impeachment.
Why didn't they call witnesses for Trump in the House?
Simple answer and not many people are given the FACTS which is the fault of the GOP especially.
The Executive branch has a RIGHT to take the House witness requests to SCOTUS.
But the Democrats didn't want to have this go to SCOTUS for one reason. Time.
The Democrats wanted to speed up the impeachment process and since they had the majority in the house
there was no need.
So now the Senate does NOT need any more witnesses.

The evidence in their file sent to the Senate contained all the evidence they needed to find Trump guilty for impeachment. Remember Nancy's "Forever Impeached?" So why now the need to bring forth more witnesses? Are the Dems admitting their case is full of holes?
The Dems were stonewalled by a corrupt POTUS. Even his lawyer admits as much.

Alan Dershowitz called Trump corrupt in 2016 and said he could be corrupt as President - CNNPolitics

Long stretch.

As usual.
 
The Senate should not do the work the House did not do.
You can not give the Democrats an inch,


Considering Turtle boy's remarks, he isn't giving them anything. They are taking it. ----- We call that WINNING

Keep it up.

At this rate, you'll have won having nobody in congress, WH, or SCOTUS.

That kind of left wing winning I can go for.
 
The House is suppose to present the facts of the impeachment.
Why didn't they call witnesses for Trump in the House?
Simple answer and not many people are given the FACTS which is the fault of the GOP especially.
The Executive branch has a RIGHT to take the House witness requests to SCOTUS.
But the Democrats didn't want to have this go to SCOTUS for one reason. Time.
The Democrats wanted to speed up the impeachment process and since they had the majority in the house
there was no need.
So now the Senate does NOT need any more witnesses.

The evidence in their file sent to the Senate contained all the evidence they needed to find Trump guilty for impeachment. Remember Nancy's "Forever Impeached?" So why now the need to bring forth more witnesses? Are the Dems admitting their case is full of holes?
The Dems were stonewalled by a corrupt POTUS. Even his lawyer admits as much.

Alan Dershowitz called Trump corrupt in 2016 and said he could be corrupt as President - CNNPolitics

Again... The House could have allowed the subpoenas to be brought before SCOTUS. But the Democrats didn't. They dropped the
subpoenas.
House Democrats Suddenly Drop Subpoena For Ex-Bolton Aide Who Asked Court To Decide If He Should Testify
House Democrats Suddenly Drop Subpoena For Ex-Bolton Aide Who Asked Court To Decide If He Should Testify

If the White House does not comply with a subpoena, the House could file a civil lawsuit, or hold people in contempt of Congres. It is unclear what ability Congress has to enforce its subpoenas, though.
Trump impeachment inquiry: Who has been subpoenaed?
 
The Senate should not do the work the House did not do.
You can not give the Democrats an inch,


Considering Turtle boy's remarks, he isn't giving them anything. They are taking it. ----- We call that WINNING

Keep it up.

At this rate, you'll have won having nobody in congress, WH, or SCOTUS.

That kind of left wing winning I can go for.

I'll mark that down as your opinion.
The Senate should not do the work the House did not do.
You can not give the Democrats an inch,


Considering Turtle boy's remarks, he isn't giving them anything. They are taking it. ----- We call that WINNING

Keep it up.

At this rate, you'll have won having nobody in congress, WH, or SCOTUS.

That kind of left wing winning I can go for.

I'll mark that down as your opinion.

Don't hurt yourself.
 
The House is suppose to present the facts of the impeachment.
Why didn't they call witnesses for Trump in the House?
Simple answer and not many people are given the FACTS which is the fault of the GOP especially.
The Executive branch has a RIGHT to take the House witness requests to SCOTUS.
But the Democrats didn't want to have this go to SCOTUS for one reason. Time.
The Democrats wanted to speed up the impeachment process and since they had the majority in the house
there was no need.
So now the Senate does NOT need any more witnesses.
Pure nonsense

There is NOTHING that mandates that the only evidence in an Impeachment trial has to be presented in the House first.

Total and pure bullshit
 
The House is suppose to present the facts of the impeachment.
Why didn't they call witnesses for Trump in the House?
Simple answer and not many people are given the FACTS which is the fault of the GOP especially.
The Executive branch has a RIGHT to take the House witness requests to SCOTUS.
But the Democrats didn't want to have this go to SCOTUS for one reason. Time.
The Democrats wanted to speed up the impeachment process and since they had the majority in the house
there was no need.
So now the Senate does NOT need any more witnesses.
Pure nonsense

There is NOTHING that mandates that the only evidence in an Impeachment trial has to be presented in the House first.

Total and pure bullshit

There is when it's a Soviet style show trial as Adolph Schiffler conducted.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top