Why The Heck Do We Believe Polls??

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by PoliticalChic, Oct 1, 2012.

  1. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    35,167
    Thanks Received:
    9,336
    Trophy Points:
    212
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +9,848
    1. "One of the most amazing — and significant — statistics of this election season has gone almost completely unnoticed:

    2. Only 9% of sampled households gave an answer to pollsters in 2012:

    3. ...increasingly difficult to contact potential respondents and to persuade them to participate.

    4. – the response rate – has fallen dramatically.

    5. At Pew Research, the response rate of a typical telephone survey was 36% in 1997 and is just 9% today.

    6. ...decline in response rates is evident across nearly all types of surveys,...

    7. ...have led many to question whether surveys are still providing accurate and unbiased information."

    8. ...among that 62%, only 14% “cooperated” with the pollsters; the remaining 86% of contactees presumably slammed down the phone or simply refused to answer.

    9. 53% of Americans actively refuse to answer poll questions.

    10. most importantly that Republicans and independents are twice as likely to distrust the media as Democrats..."
    The PJ Tatler » WE ARE THE 91%: Only 9% of Americans Cooperate with Pollsters
  2. slackjawed
    Offline

    slackjawed Self deported

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,307
    Thanks Received:
    645
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    15th congressional district of Arizona
    Ratings:
    +645
    The wife and I have had three calls in the last 2 months asking us to participate in some poll or another.

    No discrimination here, the answer was the same all three times, no.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Dr.Traveler
    Offline

    Dr.Traveler Mathematician

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,178
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    In a Non-Euclidean Manifold
    Ratings:
    +513
    It is, at this point, all the data we have. Tossing it out just means that any guess about the status of the campaign is completely arbitrary and circumstantial.

    The problem I have with the complaints about the polls this year is that none of these complaints are new, they're just being taken seriously on the Right now that they show something they do not want to acknowledge, namely Romney is blowing what should have been a childishly easy shot at the White House.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    14,420
    Thanks Received:
    1,871
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +2,208
    Beating an incumbent is never easy. Look at Kerry in 2004. If Bush was as unpopular as the left said he was, he wouldnt have won a single state.

    The same thing may protect Obama, namely it is hard to beat a sitting president.
  5. nodoginnafight
    Offline

    nodoginnafight No Party Affiliation

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2008
    Messages:
    9,762
    Thanks Received:
    764
    Trophy Points:
    73
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +769
    I think some people put credence in polls they have found to be historically accurate.

    I think some others put "credence" in polls that tell them what they want to hear or that bolster the case they are trying make at a particular time.
  6. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 USMB Mod Staff Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    61,498
    Thanks Received:
    6,693
    Trophy Points:
    170
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +6,893
    i dont.
  7. AceRothstein
    Offline

    AceRothstein VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,435
    Thanks Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +326
    Probably because they have been accurate over the last few elections.
  8. Soggy in NOLA
    Offline

    Soggy in NOLA VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2009
    Messages:
    22,197
    Thanks Received:
    2,629
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Ratings:
    +2,671
    The polls will start tightening as the race draws nearer... most pollsters, no matter how biased, wants to be seen as totally off the mark.
  9. ABikerSailor
    Offline

    ABikerSailor Taoist Wood Dragon

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    24,879
    Thanks Received:
    3,392
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Amarillo TX
    Ratings:
    +3,403
    Really? What about the Zogby poll in 2008 that had Hillary winning up in the NE when in reality it was Obama?

    I haven't trusted polls since then. The only one that counts IMHO is the one on Nov 6th.
  10. AceRothstein
    Offline

    AceRothstein VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,435
    Thanks Received:
    310
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ratings:
    +326
    I'm not saying to look at a solitary poll. When multiple polls show the same thing, they are probably right.
  11. ABikerSailor
    Offline

    ABikerSailor Taoist Wood Dragon

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2008
    Messages:
    24,879
    Thanks Received:
    3,392
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Amarillo TX
    Ratings:
    +3,403
    Actually, if I'm going to look at a poll, I prefer an average of the nationwide polls that week, and if possible, a tracking of what the averaged national polls have been doing for the past 6 months.

    Maybe then it's informative, but to trust just one over the other? Nothing but another political tool.
  12. Caroljo
    Offline

    Caroljo VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2009
    Messages:
    6,432
    Thanks Received:
    1,124
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan
    Ratings:
    +1,153
    I don't believe ANY Poll.

    I hear too many people talk about BS'ing them when they call. They'll say exactly the opposite of what they really think. Ya know...just for fun! Nope....don't pay attention to any of them!
  13. PoliticalChic
    Offline

    PoliticalChic Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    35,167
    Thanks Received:
    9,336
    Trophy Points:
    212
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +9,848
    The same.

    Every one I get, I simply say "I don't care to share any information."
  14. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    46,799
    Thanks Received:
    4,124
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Ratings:
    +4,569
    If polls are of no value, why do almost all major political campaigns pay for polling, hire pollsters, commission polls?

    Are they all wrong? Are they all incapable of figuring out that they're throwing their money away?
  15. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    33,869
    Thanks Received:
    3,629
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +3,765
    LOL:badgrin:
  16. spectrumc01
    Offline

    spectrumc01 I give you....the TRUTH

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,823
    Thanks Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The United States
    Ratings:
    +257
    Personally I believe polls should be banned. Vote your conscience. I personally believe political parties should be banned as well. The best man or woman or whatever for the job.
  17. candycorn
    Offline

    candycorn Alis volat propriis

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2009
    Messages:
    20,406
    Thanks Received:
    2,076
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Ratings:
    +2,202
    Nine percent is about 30,000,000 Americans. Pretty good sample size.

    As for point #10, it pretty much sums up the departure the GOP has taken from reality over the last 5-10 years.
  18. Dr.Traveler
    Offline

    Dr.Traveler Mathematician

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,178
    Thanks Received:
    510
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    In a Non-Euclidean Manifold
    Ratings:
    +513
    That's pretty much my view too. I do consult the usual outliers from time to time, just to see how badly a candidate is losing. For example, in 2004 I'd check out Gallup to see how bad off Kerry was, and in 2008 and 2012 I'd check in on Rasmussen to see how bad off Romney and McCain are doing. The idea being that you don't check the "Partisan" polls to see how far ahead someone is, you check them to see how far behind their candidate is.

    That's why folks are generally writing off Romney. Even Rasmussen has him losing the Electoral College.
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page