Why the GOP is/was racist: GOP's Southern Strategy

All lies a propaganda, you crackers don't like the fact that a black man is leader of the world's most powerful country. Obama will always have to do things in a manner not to piss off white folk because of his color, white presidents don't have this burden. Obama can't do things like , go to a black church because paranoid whites like you take that as a sign that he's being pro-black, when white presidents attended predominately white churchs they're not faced with this burden its seen as being normal. As for the Black Pnathers, one can make a case that the FBI should be charged for falsely accusing and fabricating evidence against the Black Panthers as well as for the murders of Fred hampton and Mark Clark whom they killed and lied about to try to cover up.


Basically, if anyone is not ding anything to preserve and placate white male privilege in America you crackers consider the person a racist and threat[they're not racist] yet ignore and deny that the way whites and especially white males have been treated for hundreds of years in America is either not racist or you try to downplay it.

If you think it's okay for you to say Cracker over and over. Then it's alright for Whites to say the N word. :eusa_eh:
 
All lies a propaganda, you crackers don't like the fact that a black man is leader of the world's most powerful country. Obama will always have to do things in a manner not to piss off white folk because of his color, white presidents don't have this burden. Obama can't do things like , go to a black church because paranoid whites like you take that as a sign that he's being pro-black, when white presidents attended predominately white churchs they're not faced with this burden its seen as being normal. As for the Black Pnathers, one can make a case that the FBI should be charged for falsely accusing and fabricating evidence against the Black Panthers as well as for the murders of Fred hampton and Mark Clark whom they killed and lied about to try to cover up.


Basically, if anyone is not ding anything to preserve and placate white male privilege in America you crackers consider the person a racist and threat[they're not racist] yet ignore and deny that the way whites and especially white males have been treated for hundreds of years in America is either not racist or you try to downplay it.

If you think it's okay for you to say Cracker over and over. Then it's alright for Whites to say the N word. :eusa_eh:


may not, and the bass stands corrected, down here in Mississippi some whites use the N word alot to refer to blacks so we just call them crackers is response.
 
And now we have a black president voted in by an overhwelming majority of blacks and a minority of whites. He has a racist black attorney general and nominates a racist Hispanic woman for the Supreme Court, has a white-hating black wife, went to a black supremacist church, tells Muslims he's on their side, drops charges against Black Panthers, sets up the White House "Office of Urban Affairs" and...

But of course, there's nothing "racist" about that, eh?

All lies a propaganda, you crackers don't like the fact that a black man is leader of the world's most powerful country. Obama will always have to do things in a manner not to piss off white folk because of his color, white presidents don't have this burden. Obama can't do things like , go to a black church because paranoid whites like you take that as a sign that he's being pro-black, when white presidents attended predominately white churchs they're not faced with this burden its seen as being normal. As for the Black Pnathers, one can make a case that the FBI should be charged for falsely accusing and fabricating evidence against the Black Panthers as well as for the murders of Fred hampton and Mark Clark whom they killed and lied about to try to cover up.


Basically, if anyone is not ding anything to preserve and placate white male privilege in America you crackers consider the person a racist and threat[they're not racist] yet ignore and deny that the way whites and especially white males have been treated for hundreds of years in America is either not racist or you try to downplay it.

Obama is more white than black(his African father had no part in his upbringing, his white grandparents had a much larger influence on him) although his lack of taste in women and sports obviously comes from his black side of the family. He has been very successful at using his skin color to parley an Ivy League diploma and now the Presidency. Naive black Americans voted for him because of the color of his skin, thought they would receive an Obama prize in the mail, just like their defense of OJ. Did you get your OJ prize Bass?
 
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nP6ccHmiZjI]YouTube - Polly want a cracker?[/ame]
 
Which political party started a civil war to end slavery in the USA? Lincoln was a republican wasn't he?

The Civil War was fought to save and preserve the Union, not to end slavery, get your facts straight, you and some gullible Negroes always repeat this lie.

The dems wanted to keep their slaves in the south and tried to separate from the USA to keep their slaves.

The Republican Lincoln did whatever it took to preserve the Union and even stated so, it had nothing to do with being kind to blacks, do a history check. The thing is, which political party in the present as in now is less appealing to minorities and has become a political party hellbent of preserving white male privilege?



I mean Robert Byrd, a dem, was a member of the kkk for many years and dems keep voting him in office.....that says something right there.

Which political party did David Duke belong to when he was elected, despite the fact that everyone knew he was still a Klansman?

Umm and what was threatening to pull the union apart again?

Dumbass, just because your black doesn't mean you are right.
 
And now we have a black president voted in by an overhwelming majority of blacks and a minority of whites. He has a racist black attorney general and nominates a racist Hispanic woman for the Supreme Court, has a white-hating black wife, went to a black supremacist church, tells Muslims he's on their side, drops charges against Black Panthers, sets up the White House "Office of Urban Affairs" and...

But of course, there's nothing "racist" about that, eh?

All lies a propaganda, you crackers don't like the fact that a black man is leader of the world's most powerful country. Obama will always have to do things in a manner not to piss off white folk because of his color, white presidents don't have this burden. Obama can't do things like , go to a black church because paranoid whites like you take that as a sign that he's being pro-black, when white presidents attended predominately white churchs they're not faced with this burden its seen as being normal. As for the Black Pnathers, one can make a case that the FBI should be charged for falsely accusing and fabricating evidence against the Black Panthers as well as for the murders of Fred hampton and Mark Clark whom they killed and lied about to try to cover up.


Basically, if anyone is not ding anything to preserve and placate white male privilege in America you crackers consider the person a racist and threat[they're not racist] yet ignore and deny that the way whites and especially white males have been treated for hundreds of years in America is either not racist or you try to downplay it.

Blacks will rue the day that a Marxists fuck up like Obama became President. He's making you guys look bad.
 
From the mouth of Lee Atwater:

[edit] Atwater on the Southern Strategy
As a member of the Reagan administration in 1981, Atwater gave an anonymous interview to Political Scientist Alexander P. Lamis. Part of this interview was printed in Lamis' book The Two-Party South, then reprinted in Southern Politics in the 1990s with Atwater's name revealed. Bob Herbert reported on the interview in the October 6, 2005 edition of the New York Times. Atwater talked about the GOP's Southern Strategy and Ronald Reagan's version of it:

Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [the new Southern Strategy of Ronald Reagan] doesn’t have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he’s campaigned on since 1964… and that’s fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster...

Questioner:
But the fact is, isn’t it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps...?

Atwater: You start out in 1954 by saying, “******, ******, ******.” By 1968 you can't say “******”—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.
And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “******, ******.”[7]

Which political party started a civil war to end slavery in the USA? Lincoln was a republican wasn't he?

The dems wanted to keep their slaves in the south and tried to separate from the USA to keep their slaves.

so i guess if you want to cherry pick moments in history you could say the democratic party is/was the racist party.

I mean Robert Byrd, a dem, was a member of the kkk for many years and dems keep voting him in office.....that says something right there.

Byrd is a repentent racist. MAny of the old Dems who became GOP were unrepentent. You C-A-N-N-O-T deny the fact that the Dem racists left the DNC for the GOP because the DNC was fighting racism as the GOP was embracing it.

The DNC was never racist...members of the DNC were racist. The modern GOP initiated a southern strategy that played to peopls fears and racism. There is NO cherry picking involved. PEople who are conservative are attempting to portray todays GOP with the GOP of old.

btw, the fight against secession did not involve a fight for equality. \Maybe liberty, but many a northern as well as southern man who abhored slavery were not for equiality. Look at the battles over the 13th/14th and other amendments.
 
Fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster = Racist

White folks greed runs a world in need, typical white behavior, garlic nose, wise Latina = Not Racist

Any Question?

FRank, if you are crusading fotr the title of USMB's biggest idiot you will have to do a lot better. MAny here have you beaten by a mile.
 
Fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster = Racist

White folks greed runs a world in need, typical white behavior, garlic nose, wise Latina = Not Racist

Any Question?

FRank, if you are crusading fotr the title of USMB's biggest idiot you will have to do a lot better. MAny here have you beaten by a mile.

Yeah, the best thing about your retort is that you didn't have to bother replying to my post in the first place, you just avoided it all together.
 
Fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster = Racist

White folks greed runs a world in need, typical white behavior, garlic nose, wise Latina = Not Racist

Any Question?

FRank, if you are crusading fotr the title of USMB's biggest idiot you will have to do a lot better. MAny here have you beaten by a mile.

Yeah, the best thing about your retort is that you didn't have to bother replying to my post in the first place, you just avoided it all together.

Frank --- this is a reply. Remember---you can't always get what you want. Even when you act like a hysterical little girlyman/boy.
 

Forum List

Back
Top