Why the GoP is the laughing stock of

Was anyone paying attention when democrats were elected into the majority in congress midway into Bush's 2nd term? Of course not. The rest of the world doesn't know or care about the majority in congress while democrats control the senate and there is still a socialist in the white house. Psychologists would probably consider that the original post as a desperate cry for help by the left wing that saw their vision of hope and change crushed last november..

The republicans had 6 years of total control and did nothing to reduce spending, and Bush vetoed not one single bill while the republicans controlled congress.

And his veto power didn't end when the Dems took control. That's too bad because there were occasions I wish he had used his veto power then.
 

The Poll-
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_US_0215.pdf


Page one- last paragraph;

The PPP surveyed 400 rep. primary voters nationwide from feb 11- 13. The survey’s margin of error is +/4.9%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.



Well, they don’t say who they are- are they registered Voters (RV)? Likely voters (LV)?, anonymous (A)?, how they surveyed them, there is no demographic info..
They also employ their own pejorative ala "Erroneously think", thats a no no, and say they are Registered GOP Primary voters but as I said don't provide anything other than that.

*shrugs* if this were gallup or ras. I would consider it. This? No.
 

The Poll-
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_US_0215.pdf


Page one- last paragraph;

The PPP surveyed 400 rep. primary voters nationwide from feb 11- 13. The survey’s margin of error is +/4.9%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.



Well, they don’t say who they are- are they registered Voters (RV)? Likely voters (LV)?, anonymous (A)?, how they surveyed them, there is no demographic info..
They also employ their own pejorative ala "Erroneously think", thats a no no, and say they are Registered GOP Primary voters but as I said don't provide anything other than that.

*shrugs* if this were gallup or ras. I would consider it. This? No.

I guess the question would be, what has their track record been in the past? Have they been wildly off before?

Track Us - What they're saying about Public Policy Polling
 
the "rest of the world" is a bunch of un-gratefull, formerly important current ghetto countries the size of my backyard that are jealous and currently irrelevant
 

The Poll-
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_US_0215.pdf


Page one- last paragraph;

The PPP surveyed 400 rep. primary voters nationwide from feb 11- 13. The survey’s margin of error is +/4.9%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.



Well, they don’t say who they are- are they registered Voters (RV)? Likely voters (LV)?, anonymous (A)?, how they surveyed them, there is no demographic info..
They also employ their own pejorative ala "Erroneously think", thats a no no, and say they are Registered GOP Primary voters but as I said don't provide anything other than that.

*shrugs* if this were gallup or ras. I would consider it. This? No.

I guess the question would be, what has their track record been in the past? Have they been wildly off before?

Track Us - What they're saying about Public Policy Polling

that is from their site....(?)

I did some checking around-

they weren't in the top 20 in 08 pres. election.....


http://www.fordham.edu/images/acade...ccuracy in the 2008 presidential election.pdf


and heres a breakout-
http://www.leftandrightnews.com/tag/poll-rating-statistics-2010/

and...

they did much better 2010, in top 5 in the midterms...*shrugs*...I didn't think much of this poll frankly. I try and read them all, that is the guts of whats posted.
 

Attachments

  • $pollacc1.png
    $pollacc1.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 50
Last edited:

The Poll-
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_US_0215.pdf


Page one- last paragraph;

The PPP surveyed 400 rep. primary voters nationwide from feb 11- 13. The survey’s margin of error is +/4.9%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.



Well, they don’t say who they are- are they registered Voters (RV)? Likely voters (LV)?, anonymous (A)?, how they surveyed them, there is no demographic info..
They also employ their own pejorative ala "Erroneously think", thats a no no, and say they are Registered GOP Primary voters but as I said don't provide anything other than that.

*shrugs* if this were gallup or ras. I would consider it. This? No.

Humor the little guy from a foreign country that's so boring that he watches American politics.
 

The Poll-
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_US_0215.pdf


Page one- last paragraph;

The PPP surveyed 400 rep. primary voters nationwide from feb 11- 13. The survey’s margin of error is +/4.9%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.



Well, they don’t say who they are- are they registered Voters (RV)? Likely voters (LV)?, anonymous (A)?, how they surveyed them, there is no demographic info..
They also employ their own pejorative ala "Erroneously think", thats a no no, and say they are Registered GOP Primary voters but as I said don't provide anything other than that.

*shrugs* if this were gallup or ras. I would consider it. This? No.

Humor the little guy from a foreign country that's so boring that he watches American politics.

And you don't watch politics, Our Little Board Sleeze?
 
The Poll-
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_US_0215.pdf


Page one- last paragraph;

The PPP surveyed 400 rep. primary voters nationwide from feb 11- 13. The survey’s margin of error is +/4.9%. Other factors, such as refusal to be interviewed and weighting, may introduce additional error that is more difficult to quantify.



Well, they don’t say who they are- are they registered Voters (RV)? Likely voters (LV)?, anonymous (A)?, how they surveyed them, there is no demographic info..
They also employ their own pejorative ala "Erroneously think", thats a no no, and say they are Registered GOP Primary voters but as I said don't provide anything other than that.

*shrugs* if this were gallup or ras. I would consider it. This? No.

Humor the little guy from a foreign country that's so boring that he watches American politics.

And you don't watch politics, Our Little Board Sleeze?

Board Sleeze :lol:
I sure as hell don't pay any attention to NZ politics. Y'all have a king or a dictator ?
 
ROFLMAO

So if you dare Question Obama you are the Laughing stock of the world.

Considering much of the world still lives under Dictators who can not be questioned. I am not surprised :)

I think the point is that if you question his citizenship, you are the laughing stock of the world.

More of a laughing stock than those that think 9-11 was an inside Bush job?

Wonder why Pelosi was never criticized for not condemning those that claim 9-11 was an inside job the way Boehner was criticized for not condemning the birthers.

Hmmmm......and there is no media bias.


Which Democratic Congressmen have claimed that, for Pelosi to criticize?
 

Forum List

Back
Top