Why Support A President Who Would Be Charged With These Offences?

[ThoughtCrimes]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

 

[DJT for Life]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

I never voted for Obama in the first place.

 

[jc456]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

I never voted for Obama in the first place.

Me either

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

We didn't , that is why Hillary Rotten Clinton didn't get in office....

 

[Cellblock2429]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

Why can't you libs leave Hillary alone?

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

Maybe when you pony up some proof...

 

[Blake Allyn]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

Maybe when you pony up some proof...

On my thread you were given proof and ran away like a cry baby.

OP, dont bother presenting this boring partisan hack with proof, hell just leave the thread.

He beleives whatever his party believes like a good little NAZI.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

Maybe when you pony up some proof...

Proof acceptable to Congress to initiate Impeachment proceedings? Is that what you're ridiculous question is asking?

 

[Blake Allyn]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

Maybe when you pony up some proof...

Proof acceptable to Congress to initiate Impeachment proceedings? Is that what you're ridiculous question is asking?

You shouldn't support Madison. He was a horrible, vile man.

 

[Anathema]

.How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

If he was/is running against HRC OR any of her clones, definitely. The reason should be self-evident.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

What brilliant minds inhabit this board. The knee jerks were noted with every post responding to the content of the OP. The Pavlovian replies came from the herd that was being fished for their knowledge, reaction and integrity. In every case, sans the troll posts, those responding to the OP jumped on their partisan scooters and tried to lay the nine(9) charges in the OP at the feet of Clinton or Obama as a shield for the Cheeto-in-Chief. Well you were wrong all around in your partisan assumptions.

Actually, those nine charges were part of the Articles of Impeachment dated July 27, 1974 for Richard M. Nixon, another fucking crook POTUS. It is no wonder that they were mistaken as those being discussed regarding the Orange One since they run so parallel one to the other! I suppose it's a matter of blind fealty and tribal instinct to be so bloody myopic! I can't believe that the nine charges went all morning without being recognized as Congressional legalese or someone not being inquisitive enough to C&P a line and Google it. You can look it over at the link below. Ta TA rubes!
~~ U.S. Congress: Articles of Impeachment Adopted by the House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary ~~

@ Cellblock2429 - Those "allegation" were enough to get a crook kicked to the curb, smart ass!
@Admiral Rockwell Tory - The proof was right before your lying eyes, asshole!
@Anathema - So you'd put Nixon back in the WH! Got it.
@DJT for Life - Catch up with the current times. The OP was NEVER about Obama...get help!
@Blake Allyn - Did you loose your bike, sonny?

 

[WillMunny]

Because, silly child, all these fantasy charges came directly from your fecal imagination. From a head lodged so far up Obama's ass, you could probably nurse your bile directly from Obama's gall bladder. Get bad to me if Trump gets indicted or convicted of any of your beyond-methamphetamine paranoid delusions. Nothing about Trump has anything what-the-fuck-soever with Nixon, who's been out of power for over 40 years.

 

[OKTexas]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

Poor thing, maobama,the bitch, holder and lynch are no longer in office. LMFAO


.

 

[OKTexas]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

Poor thing, you just can't help but to lie. First you provided no evidence and second you never mentioned a republican in your OP. So accusing him of not answering your question is BS and now you're trying to move the goal posts. Typical regressive.


.

 

[LeftofLeft]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

1. Making false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
2. Withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States;
3. Approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counselling witnesses with respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States and false or misleading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings;
4. Interfering or endeavouring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and Congressional Committees;
5. Approving, condoning, and acquiescing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtaining the silence or influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential witnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities;
6. Endeavouring to misuse the Central Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States;
7. Disseminating information received from officers of the Department of Justice of the United States to subjects of investigations conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States, for the purpose of aiding and assisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability;
8. Making or causing to be made false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted with respect to allegations of misconduct on the part of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the election of the President, and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct: or
9. Endeavouring to cause prospective defendants, and individuals duly tried and convicted, to expect favoured treatment and consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony.

I can't understand why folks would still support and approve of any person with these allegations against them above, but about 33% of those polled approved and were that gullible after the fact.

How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

/----/ How would you like to lose your job based solely on ALLEGATIONS? Do you realize how ridiculous you sound?

I asked a question! You FAILED to form a response to that question, but instead form two other questions. You're response is fairly ridiculous given the evidence and the question!

Here's another chance to redeem yourself. Do you believe an American Republican President deserves the approval of the electorate to any degree with charges such as the above against them should be retained as POTUS or forced out of office in disgrace? Try an actual response to the question this time.

Poor thing, you just can't help but to lie. First you provided no evidence and second you never mentioned a republican in your OP. So accusing him of not answering your question is BS and now you're trying to move the goal posts. Typical regressive.

Poor thing, you just can't help but to lie. First you provided no evidence and second you never mentioned a republican in your OP. So accusing him of not answering your question is BS and now you're trying to move the goal posts.

What evidence, FOOL! Do you see any person named in the OP at all, shit for brains? So what if I never named a Republican in the OP? I didn't name a Democrat or an Independent either for that matter! So fucking what? I asked ALL who cared to answer the single question directly below;

"How many of you would vote again for the man charged with the above and WHY?"

You see you ignorant twit, the idea was for others to evaluate the charges and then decide if the person charged with that list was worthy of a vote from the person responding? It also had the secondary objective to see how many responding would jump on pointing fingers at Hillary, Obama, B. Clinton, Carter or whoever! Cellblock just can't resist going off the reservation and as usual jumped at a non sequitur, the dumb fuck!

Is giving him a second bite of the apple what set you off and made you go butt-fuck, bat-shit crazy you fucking jerk?? That second question for him is where I purposefully used that hallow and sacred tribal word 'Republican". Then the fucking putz didn't respond to it. That ain't moving a damn blade of grass asshole! Now go piss up a rope Tex, you trolling sack of lying shit!

 

[ScienceRocks]

The American taliban would support selling our country to Russia before they'll allow gays and trans to be free.

Religion has one thing in common world wide....They hate these two groups of people. It is sad.

 

[Wintw]

ThoughtCrime you are looser but it was all a good laugh! As a matter of fact I will probably still be laughing about it for some time now! LOL!!!!!!