Why no jet fighters going over 2000 mph?

Discussion in 'Military' started by Matthew, Nov 15, 2012.

  1. Matthew
    Online

    Matthew Blue dog all the way!

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2010
    Messages:
    49,755
    Thanks Received:
    4,607
    Trophy Points:
    1,885
    Location:
    Portland Oregon
    Ratings:
    +15,209
    Why no jet fighters going over 2000 mph. I'd think with the advancement in engine technology that we could have such planes.
     
  2. Moonglow
    Offline

    Moonglow Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    82,000
    Thanks Received:
    8,036
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    sw mizzouri
    Ratings:
    +29,616
    until you put human in one.
     
  3. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,127
    Thanks Received:
    9,267
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,406
    They'd overtake their own spent ordinance.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. waltky
    Online

    waltky Wise ol' monkey Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    20,884
    Thanks Received:
    1,791
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Okolona, KY
    Ratings:
    +3,884
    Engine crack at center of F-35 grounding...
    :eusa_eh:
    Fighters could be back in the air in a fortnight: Pentagon
    Tue, Feb 26, 2013 - The Pentagon’s director of the F-35 program said yesterday the next-generation US fighter jet could be back in the air within two weeks after an engine crack forced the grounding of test flights.
     
  5. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    We have planes that go that fast, but no weapon system that does. That means any armed plane would have to slow down to engage a target, which no fighter pilot I ever met thinks is a good idea.
     
  6. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,127
    Thanks Received:
    9,267
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,406
    What about the A-10?
     
  7. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Heh...Great answer.

    The opposite was the problem for the tail gun on the B-58.

    What happens to the rearward-fired bullets, when your aircraft is flying at or nearly at the muzzle velocity in the opposite direction?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Quantum Windbag
    Offline

    Quantum Windbag Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,308
    Thanks Received:
    5,014
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +5,221
    Warthog pilots are insane.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    A-10 drivers are the shit.
     
  10. zzzz
    Offline

    zzzz Just a regular American

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    3,072
    Thanks Received:
    422
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Yountsville
    Ratings:
    +429
    Both the SR 71 and the MIG 25 have exceeded MACH 3 and 2,000 mph. Of course no external weapons since this would create drag and slow the airframe down.
     

Share This Page