Why Men Don't like Condoms Study

Sex is about mixing I and you, you and I.

A rubber baloon makes it all about this and the other.
 
It would be very disappointing to discover my tax money was going somewhere useless, obscene and whose ultimate goal could be told by any random Joe on the street.

It would be very, very disappointing...

why is it obscene? i'm curious because the choice of word seems to exhibit more than just a concern about money. are you making a moral judgment about the use of condoms?

if the goal is to cut down on sexually transmitted diseases and unwanted pregnancy then it might make sense for NIH to find out why people don't want to use condoms and find ways to make them more user-friendly.

but the rightwing blogosphere is all abuzz. *shrug*

you know, the bush admin spent one million dollars on a study about whether prayer works. personally, i think that one was a bit goofy.

:cuckoo:

Cmon Jillian----the pres always gets nailed for doing silly shit. Why men AND women don't like condoms is fucking obvious.
 
meh, are you tryin' to screw a piece of rubber or have sex with/make love to your woman?

Maybe that's the purpose of the study--to come up with a material that's more like the real thing. I guess over the years condoms have improved in that regard, but I wouldn't know. Back in the day, STDs weren't so much an issue as getting pregnant and birth control pills were the way to go for that.

It's also true that since several drug cocktails now control the HIV virus, people have become more lax, and AIDS is on the rise once again in this country.
 
Here we are, broke as hell, and the government is funding a 1/2 Million dollar study of why men don't like to wear condoms. :(
NIH Funds $423,500 Study of Why Men Don't Like to Use Condoms - Political News - FOXNews.com

Since I rarely pay any attention to FOXNews, I'm curious if they have always reported on selected government pork projects, or is it just since we now have a Democratic majority and a Democrat for a president that they are trying to make you think these "projects" that make no sense except to the researchers is something new. Guess what. It isn't. And oh yeah, we were broke last year, and the year before that too.

Citizens Against Government Waste:



Oh come on. A little freakin' honesty. How hard is it just to say.. " That's a dumb thing to spend taxpayer money on" ? You don't have to run defense ALL the time.

Just tossing out another side to consider, just like you guys do. If the year were 2001 and MSNBC had reported on that, how loud would you be yelling BIAS!!!
 
Here we are, broke as hell, and the government is funding a 1/2 Million dollar study of why men don't like to wear condoms. :(
NIH Funds $423,500 Study of Why Men Don't Like to Use Condoms - Political News - FOXNews.com

What's this "we" shit? You may be broke as hell but I'm not. The country is not. Your IDOL Rush Limpdick with his 400 million dollar contract is certainly not.

Getting men to participate in lowering the birth rate is important.

Only a dumb ass would think it isn't. Most men don't like condoms. When they discover facts that support that notion then maybe there will be an emphasis on some other way to encourage males to not impregnate women. Maybe it will put preasure on science to erradicate STD's

A study like this could be very important. $423,500 is peanuts. Get Rush to pay for it so he won't feel so guilty screwing young boys in 3rd world countries.

Since when did the federal government gain power from the Constitution to educate the people in Sexual matters?? When does the expantion stop?? When do left-wing liberal cheerleaders like yourself stop drinking all the Koolaide??

I think George W. Bush entered that zone with his abstinence-only program, million dollar programs for "happy" family planning, etc.

Next?
 
What's this "we" shit? You may be broke as hell but I'm not. The country is not. Your IDOL Rush Limpdick with his 400 million dollar contract is certainly not.

Getting men to participate in lowering the birth rate is important.

Only a dumb ass would think it isn't. Most men don't like condoms. When they discover facts that support that notion then maybe there will be an emphasis on some other way to encourage males to not impregnate women. Maybe it will put preasure on science to erradicate STD's

A study like this could be very important. $423,500 is peanuts. Get Rush to pay for it so he won't feel so guilty screwing young boys in 3rd world countries.

Since when did the federal government gain power from the Constitution to educate the people in Sexual matters?? When does the expantion stop?? When do left-wing liberal cheerleaders like yourself stop drinking all the Koolaide??

I think George W. Bush entered that zone with his abstinence-only program, million dollar programs for "happy" family planning, etc.

Next?

So you think Bush was better....I thought you were in the runnings for Liberal hack of the year on this board?? Bush , Obama , Clinton , McCain.....all of em want to control our lives down to where we stick our cocks....so....blow me.

Next??
 
Since when did the federal government gain power from the Constitution to educate the people in Sexual matters?? When does the expantion stop?? When do left-wing liberal cheerleaders like yourself stop drinking all the Koolaide??

I think George W. Bush entered that zone with his abstinence-only program, million dollar programs for "happy" family planning, etc.

Next?

So you think Bush was better....I thought you were in the runnings for Liberal hack of the year on this board?? Bush , Obama , Clinton , McCain.....all of em want to control our lives down to where we stick our cocks....so....blow me.

Next??

Lovely. Run along now, I think your favorite porn bloggers eagerly await your commentary.
 
I think George W. Bush entered that zone with his abstinence-only program, million dollar programs for "happy" family planning, etc.

Next?

So you think Bush was better....I thought you were in the runnings for Liberal hack of the year on this board?? Bush , Obama , Clinton , McCain.....all of em want to control our lives down to where we stick our cocks....so....blow me.

Next??

Lovely. Run along now, I think your favorite porn bloggers eagerly await your commentary.

Run along now??? Check the join date mother fucker....you run along.

Just cuzz you run about spewing your libby biased lefty talking points with little care for common sense or Constitutional integrity to boost your post count....doesnt mean you have shit on me. Enjoy your koolaide....
 
I think George W. Bush entered that zone with his abstinence-only program, million dollar programs for "happy" family planning, etc.

Next?

So you think Bush was better....I thought you were in the runnings for Liberal hack of the year on this board?? Bush , Obama , Clinton , McCain.....all of em want to control our lives down to where we stick our cocks....so....blow me.

Next??

Lovely. Run along now, I think your favorite porn bloggers eagerly await your commentary.

Now what does THAT have to do with politics? It's ironic that you complain about me accusing you of maintaining a certain profession for low wages after this post of yours.
 
I lost a $5.00 bet because of a condom a long time ago. A friend of mine bet me the $5.00 that he could put a gallon of water into a condom without it bursting. Well, he did it and I lost the $5.00. If I had of known that some years before I could have made some really kick-ass water balloons!:lol:
 
I lost a $5.00 bet because of a condom a long time ago. A friend of mine bet me the $5.00 that he could put a gallon of water into a condom without it bursting. Well, he did it and I lost the $5.00. If I had of known that some years before I could have made some really kick-ass water balloons!:lol:

So....theoretically....a condom can hold a gallon of semen??? Cool.
 
Condoms decrease sensitivity about 75%.
Not good if the gal isn't that attractive tp begin with.
If she's a 10 then I'd wouldn't mind wearing two.

I've had a BJ from a very attractive Pro
with and without a condom.
There is no comparrison.
Condoms suck.

If a gal blows you when wearing a condom
I don't think she can count that as giving you a BJ.
An exchage of body fluid is neccesary.

If humans didn't screw monkeys
or however Aids came to be then
their only use would be Birth Control.

I also believe that it might only be a 25%
decreased sensation for the woman if any.

Baltimore Bob against Condoms
 
I lost a $5.00 bet because of a condom a long time ago. A friend of mine bet me the $5.00 that he could put a gallon of water into a condom without it bursting. Well, he did it and I lost the $5.00. If I had of known that some years before I could have made some really kick-ass water balloons!:lol:

So....theoretically....a condom can hold a gallon of semen??? Cool.

It can hold a gallon of semen, minus the volume of the cock.
 
Condoms decrease sensitivity about 75%.
Not good if the gal isn't that attractive tp begin with.
If she's a 10 then I'd wouldn't mind wearing two.

I've had a BJ from a very attractive Pro
with and without a condom.
There is no comparrison.
Condoms suck.

If a gal blows you when wearing a condom
I don't think she can count that as giving you a BJ.
An exchage of body fluid is neccesary.

If humans didn't screw monkeys
or however Aids came to be then
their only use would be Birth Control.

I also believe that it might only be a 25%
decreased sensation for the woman if any.

Baltimore Bob against Condoms

Reading this was creepy....dunno why...just was.
 
I lost a $5.00 bet because of a condom a long time ago. A friend of mine bet me the $5.00 that he could put a gallon of water into a condom without it bursting. Well, he did it and I lost the $5.00. If I had of known that some years before I could have made some really kick-ass water balloons!:lol:

So....theoretically....a condom can hold a gallon of semen??? Cool.

It can hold a gallon of semen, minus the volume of the cock.

Has this been tested though??
 
Here we are, broke as hell, and the government is funding a 1/2 Million dollar study of why men don't like to wear condoms. :(
NIH Funds $423,500 Study of Why Men Don't Like to Use Condoms - Political News - FOXNews.com

What's this "we" shit? You may be broke as hell but I'm not. The country is not. Your IDOL Rush Limpdick with his 400 million dollar contract is certainly not.

Getting men to participate in lowering the birth rate is important.

Only a dumb ass would think it isn't. Most men don't like condoms. When they discover facts that support that notion then maybe there will be an emphasis on some other way to encourage males to not impregnate women. Maybe it will put preasure on science to erradicate STD's

A study like this could be very important. $423,500 is peanuts. Get Rush to pay for it so he won't feel so guilty screwing young boys in 3rd world countries.


Women don't like the taste of latex either....
 
all this does is remind me I need to buy some condoms today! Thanks guys!
And by the way Bob humans did fuck monkeys, do alittle research on the developement of the polio vaccine and you will get a few answers.
 

Forum List

Back
Top