Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
your weak projection humors me. I think some of your brain must have been left behind in a rice field
my genration worked. yours fucks off. ah whats a rice paddy????
wouldn't unemployment be a bit higher than 10% if my whole generation fucked off?
my genration worked. yours fucks off. ah whats a rice paddy????
wouldn't unemployment be a bit higher than 10% if my whole generation fucked off?
your generation IS unemployed !!!! playin cards and drinkin berr all day !!!!!
my genration worked. yours fucks off. ah whats a rice paddy????
wouldn't unemployment be a bit higher than 10% if my whole generation fucked off?
your generation IS unemployed !!!! playin cards and drinkin berr all day !!!!!
wouldn't unemployment be a bit higher than 10% if my whole generation fucked off?
your generation IS unemployed !!!! playin cards and drinkin berr all day !!!!!
so you have no proof or reasoning skills.
Because heath care reform is something that spans state boundaries, you know, interstate commerce. Something the federal government has the right and responsibility to regulate according to the constitution.Oh?
Then why isn't healthcare reform a state issue?
Gimme a break: Feds can liberally expand the "responsiblity" of the federal government to include mandating health insurance, but not mandating protection for healthcare providers from frivolous lawsuits?
Cherry Picking Much?
Your's is the typical response of Lawyers making Money For Lawyers to interpret Laws For Lawyers
and why didn't Osama fix this back in jan/feb when he had plenty $$$ to do it then??? instead chosing to blow on failed and collaped programs that cost us trillions. and now the craps have all their lil marbles in one basket
god damned fuckin' liberals. their more dangerous than terrorist !!!!!
Because heath care reform is something that spans state boundaries, you know, interstate commerce. Something the federal government has the right and responsibility to regulate according to the constitution.
Gimme a break: Feds can liberally expand the "responsiblity" of the federal government to include mandating health insurance, but not mandating protection for healthcare providers from frivolous lawsuits?
Cherry Picking Much?
Your's is the typical response of Lawyers making Money For Lawyers to interpret Laws For Lawyers
You are a part of the problem. You have heard this and have not bothered to find out if it's true or not.
Tort Reform Unlikely to Cut Health Care Costs « The Washington Independent
If the 1% of total heathcare expenditures is correct as a description of the cost of medical lawsuits, if the federal government banned all medical lawsuits, the price of healthcare would be lowered by exactly 1%. IMO, not enough to waste a good political battle over.
Krauthammer cited a study by the Massachusetts Medical Society that found that five out of six doctors said they ordered additional tests, procedures and referrals to protect themselves from lawsuits. He also relies on a much-criticized study from the libertarian Pacific Research Institute on the civil justice system to conclude that “defensive medicine” wastes more than $200 billion a year.
We fight for openness and democratic accountability in government, for the right of consumers to seek redress in the courts; for clean, safe and sustainable energy sources; for social and economic justice in trade policies; for strong health, safety and environmental protections; and for safe, effective and affordable prescription drugs and health care.
and why didn't Osama fix this back in jan/feb when he had plenty $$$ to do it then??? instead chosing to blow on failed and collaped programs that cost us trillions. and now the craps have all their lil marbles in one basket
god damned fuckin' liberals. their more dangerous than terrorist !!!!!
can you show us stats/numbers for trillions of dollars spent?
Do you mean They're more dangerous?and why didn't Osama fix this back in jan/feb when he had plenty $$$ to do it then??? instead chosing to blow on failed and collaped programs that cost us trillions. and now the craps have all their lil marbles in one basket
god damned fuckin' liberals. their more dangerous than terrorist !!!!!
Do you mean They're more dangerous?and why didn't Osama fix this back in jan/feb when he had plenty $$$ to do it then??? instead chosing to blow on failed and collaped programs that cost us trillions. and now the craps have all their lil marbles in one basket
god damned fuckin' liberals. their more dangerous than terrorist !!!!!
When one does little reading, it is reflected in ones writing. When one does little reading, ones opinion lacks credibility.
Doctor's visits and routine care should be covered by any and all private plans. This promotes preventative care and helps stem the rise in treatable infirmities. It's not just catastrophic care, it's the cheaper preventative care we should be concerned with!
and why didn't Osama fix this back in jan/feb when he had plenty $$$ to do it then??? instead chosing to blow on failed and collaped programs that cost us trillions. and now the craps have all their lil marbles in one basket
god damned fuckin' liberals. their more dangerous than terrorist !!!!!
can you show us stats/numbers for trillions of dollars spent?
sure its going into liberal coffers for elections !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The insurance companies have Congress in their pockets. Can we agree on that? With that in mind, what types of real reform, real regulation do you expect?
The Democrats have been feverishly working on health care reform/regulations now since the summer. the Republicans, deep in the pockets of the insurance companies, have sat on their hands and obstructed during this whole episode.
Do you expect the Republicans, who have enjoyed a majority in the Congress for some time now, to do anything substantive? Do you expect Congress as a whole, still remembering how the insurance lobby has them in check, to produce any legislation that does not benefit the insurance companies at the expense of the sick and working class?
Just reading some of the posts on these message boards should answer your question. In America we have a large group of people who are:
1. Stupid
2. Lazy (Too lazy to read for themselves, so they believe there are 'death panels' in the health care bill).
3. Ignorant (Not smart enough to comprehend something as complicated as health insurance reform nor are they smart enough to figure out what something really is versus what it's being called.)
The problem is bitter partisanship. No real ideas have come from the right side of the aisle. No substantive suggestions have been proffered by the Republicans.
I don't like the bill either. But not for the same reason, surely, you don't. I wish there was a 'robust' public option included.The insurance companies have Congress in their pockets. Can we agree on that? With that in mind, what types of real reform, real regulation do you expect?
The Democrats have been feverishly working on health care reform/regulations now since the summer. the Republicans, deep in the pockets of the insurance companies, have sat on their hands and obstructed during this whole episode.
Do you expect the Republicans, who have enjoyed a majority in the Congress for some time now, to do anything substantive? Do you expect Congress as a whole, still remembering how the insurance lobby has them in check, to produce any legislation that does not benefit the insurance companies at the expense of the sick and working class?
in one sentence the Dems are these tireless workers for the people,and Repubs are the assholes.....and then you loop them both together as being assholes,who wont do nothing because they are both in the Ins. Co's pockets.....which is it?....as far as i am concerned they both are doing as little as possible,BUT, making it look like they are doing something,but actually doing very little....and since the Dems are in the majority,they are the good guys while the Minority Repubs are playing the bad guys.....depends on who is in power for this.....but when its all done....it will basically be the same as what we have now...RATIONED HEALTH CARE.....just a different sheriff....
Why was the Republican effort for reform so weak, and its effort at obstructionism so strong?The problem is bitter partisanship. No real ideas have come from the right side of the aisle. No substantive suggestions have been proffered by the Republicans.
you know Nosmo....there are already a few threads on health care around here,and someone in each one says what you are saying here.....and all of a sudden a dozen links come up with Republican proposals and some are just as good as any Dems.....this stuff is getting to get old....
Why Land of the Free is so conflicted on health care..
I'm not conflicted. I want to get what I pay for, and I want others to pay for what they get/want. I don't want to pay for someone to get free healthcare. Simple enough?
