Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Typical Obama.
Toss out the Democrats next year, and construction will be up and running 15 months from now.
Kerry admits Keystone XL rejection about politics, not numbers
For all you (cough) environmentalists. Imagine one of these rail cars leaving the track and exploding. Or a drunk driver smashing into one at a train crossing. Guess what would happen to all the other rail cars? GOLD STAR!
Low oil prices and the high cost of extracting Canadian crude from oil sands are casting new doubts on Keystone XL as executives with the Canadian company that wants to build it face the final regulatory hurdle next week in Nebraska. The pipeline proposed in 2008 has faced dozens of state and federal delays, many of them prompted by environmental groups who ultimately persuaded President Barack Obama to deny federal approval in November 2015. President Donald Trump resuscitated the project in March, declaring that Calgary-based TransCanada would create "an incredible pipeline." In this July 29, 2017 photo, corn farmer Jim Carlson of Silver Creek, Ne., waits to be interviewed by a television reporter while standing in front of solar panels he is building on his land in the proposed path of the Keystone XL pipeline.
Future of pipeline unsure
After all that, a TransCanada executive raised eyebrows in the energy industry last week when he suggested that the pipeline developer doesn't know whether it will move forward with the project. Paul Miller, an executive vice president who is overseeing the project, told an investor call that company officials won't decide until late November or early December whether to start construction. "We'll make an assessment of the commercial support and the regulatory approvals at that time," Miller said in the conference call Friday with investors. The company has invited customers to bid for long-term contracts to ship oil on the pipeline. The bidding will run through September.
Delays have hurt project
An energy expert said the project has been delayed so long it may no longer make economic sense. "Frankly, in the current price climate, it's probably not going to be a going venture unless there's a massive improvement in technology" for processing Canadian crude, said Charles Mason, a University of Wyoming professor of petroleum and gas economics. Crude oil was trading at around $49.50 a barrel on Wednesday, down from highs of more than $100 in 2014. The 1,179-mile pipeline would transport oil from tar sands deposits in Alberta, Canada, across Montana and South Dakota to Nebraska, where it would connect with existing pipelines that feed Texas Gulf Coast refineries. South Dakota and Montana regulators have approved the project, although there are legal challenges pending in both states. Only Nebraska has yet to give regulatory approval. The rest of the route for the oil to the Gulf would travel an existing pipeline in the network.
A lower-value product
Mason said the biggest economic problem is that synthetic crude from the Canadian deposits is considered a lower-value product because it tends to be heavier, and thus more expensive to refine into gasoline and jet fuel. It's also more expensive to extract than other oils. Producers have also found other ways to ship oil, primarily by train, and many are reluctant to sign long-term contracts with a pipeline that wouldn't go into operation for several more years, said Jeff Share, editor of the Houston-based Pipeline and Gas Journal, a leading industry publication. Given the difficulties, Share said TransCanada has probably a "50-50" chance of completing the project. The five-member Nebraska Public Service Commission is supposed to decide by Nov. 23 whether the project serves the public's interests, based on evidence presented by attorneys in a formal legal proceeding beginning Monday and a series of public hearings held over the last few months. The elected commission is comprised of four Republicans and one Democrat.
Protests continue in Nebraska
The Keystone line will be carrying oil from the dirtiest mining operation in the world. We should not allow any of that oil into this nation.
Since when do they mine for oil? lolThe Keystone line will be carrying oil from the dirtiest mining operation in the world. We should not allow any of that oil into this nation.
Since when do they mine for oil? lolThe Keystone line will be carrying oil from the dirtiest mining operation in the world. We should not allow any of that oil into this nation.
