Why Justice Roberts was right

[Chris]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

 

[Google]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

A tax deduction is not a penalty.

 

[Listening]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

Wow Chris....you are right on your game.

You state that Justice Roberts was right and then make no argument whatsoever to prove it only concluding at the end that it will cost you, and you are fine for personal reasons.

No argument....that is your game.

Just like most lefties on this board.

All blather and no substance.

Asswipe.

Why do you waste our time ?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Roberts was right and here is the video that proves it!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJxoV5O8HUU]Frank Zappa - Stevie's spanking (Featuring Steve Vai) Live duet version - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Quantum Windbag]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

He was right because you like judicial activism when it gives you a result you like, that is the only reason he is right. If he had said the same thing and said that Obamacare was trash you would be screaming about him all over the place.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Whatever O does, Chris is down. Right, wrong, unethical, fraudulent....whatever the case.

 

[Misty]

What happens if you say fuck it, I'm not getting insurance and I'm not paying the tax? Go ahead arrest me you pricks.

 

[CaféAuLait]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

What tax penalty is being paid if one rents a home?

What tax penalty is one paying if they are single?

What tax penalty is one paying if they don't have children?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

What happens if you say fuck it, I'm not getting insurance and I'm not paying the tax? Go ahead arrest me you pricks.

Don't do that!! If you're going to cheat them do it legally.

 

[Misty]

What happens if you say fuck it, I'm not getting insurance and I'm not paying the tax? Go ahead arrest me you pricks.

Don't do that!! If you're going to cheat them do it legally.

I would like to know how far they are willing to go.

People who don't buy insurance now are still not going to buy it and they aren't going to pay the fine either.

 

[Contumacious]

Why Justice Roberts was right.

Because this flag is prominently displayed in your living room and you believe in the principles that it stands for?

.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

What happens if you say fuck it, I'm not getting insurance and I'm not paying the tax? Go ahead arrest me you pricks.

Actually, Obamacare specifically prohibits any criminal penalty from not paying the tax.

 

[Qball]

if you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2k, but i am fine with it, if it helps other people.

lol.

 

[Leweman]

What happens if you say fuck it, I'm not getting insurance and I'm not paying the tax? Go ahead arrest me you pricks.

Actually, Obamacare specifically prohibits any criminal penalty from not paying the tax.

then whats the point?

 

[WillowTree]

I'm gonna go get me a hover round while there's still some money ..

 

[signelect]

It should be aganist the law for congress to pay a law that they are exempt from and the SC should not rule on a law that does not apply to members of the court. the Washington crowd consider themselves the elite and the rest of us trash. It is time for the trash to give the elite a thrashing. Be careful who you vote for it could be a politician.

 

[Jackson]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

Justice Roberts was wrong because he ruled in individual mandate under the Commerce Law as written was unconstitutional. He should have stopped there because that is how the law was written. But he went on further to how the law was argued, not written and said it was a tax.

Even Obama today says it is not a tax, but a penalty. But the penalty was unconstitutional. Do you understand why Roberts went too far?

 

[Trajan]

If you are single, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you don't have kids, you are paying a tax penalty.

If you rent, you are paying a tax penalty.

Now if you don't have health insurance, you will be paying a tax penalty.

It will cost me about 2K, but I am fine with it, if it helps other people.

he was 'right' because he voted your way.

hello, had he voted 5-4 with Kennedy et al he and that 'side' of the court, they would right now be under severe excoriation by the media and you know it, now that hes voted 5-4 with your 'side', its wise, considered decision, not a radical court

 

[Pho_King]

Well I for one am tired of citizens being allowed to make poor personal decisions with no consequences. Government had previously been hamstrung in eliminating the right to make such decisions for oneself. Now, thanks to justice Roberts, we can go some distance towards curing individuals of the desire to make poor decisions by taxing the hell oort of even negative decisions. The commerce clause had expanded enough, but mr. Roberts found a new avenue to control the idiots. Thank god.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Well I for one am tired of citizens being allowed to make poor personal decisions with no consequences. Government had previously been hamstrung in eliminating the right to make such decisions for oneself. Now, thanks to justice Roberts, we can go some distance towards curing individuals of the desire to make poor decisions by taxing the hell oort of even negative decisions. The commerce clause had expanded enough, but mr. Roberts found a new avenue to control the idiots. Thank god.

I thought the court was supposed to protect us from unconstitutional law.....not rewrite it to make it constitutional. I guess my civics classes were way off years ago.