Why is raising Medicare/SS retirement to 67 so hard?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by healthmyths, Sep 28, 2012.

  1. healthmyths
    Online

    healthmyths Gold Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2011
    Messages:
    15,230
    Thanks Received:
    2,044
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,850
    Romney/Ryan want to:
    1) For any one under age 55 raise retirement age for SS/Medicare to age 67.

    Why is that so bad for people age 55 and over today? It won't affect their payments. Nothing changes for them.

    And for those UNDER age 55, So instead of receiving payments at age 65, people would have two more years to pay in.
    Instead of money going out at age 65, money will still be coming in.

    It is that simple.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2012
  2. OKTexas
    Offline

    OKTexas New Life Member of the NRA 12/15 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2012
    Messages:
    24,086
    Thanks Received:
    3,754
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Near Magnolia, TX
    Ratings:
    +11,229
    My full benefits for SS doesn't start till 66 now, although I'm going to apply at 62, it would take 13 years to make up the difference if I wait till 66. I'll never apply for medicare unless I'm forced to.
     
  3. uscitizen
    Offline

    uscitizen Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    45,941
    Thanks Received:
    4,791
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    My Shack
    Ratings:
    +4,807
    You ever been 55 and tried to get a job when you job was offshored?






    raising the medicare age would cost some businesses money. The ones that offer retiree health care benefits becuase they force their retirees onto Medicare when eligable and just pay the supplemental policy.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2012

Share This Page