Why is Obama standing by?

Why is Obama standing by? Because every time he sits down the right complain about it.

Don't even get me started with that fucking empty suit fake president. This clown has not even made a speech, not once, about this massive slaughter.

It is an outrage that the leader of the free world, this far left loser - a true friend of the far left garbage media like the NY Times - has said and done NOTHING. If a republican was in the white house, the media would be screaming over this inaction while thousands are murdered. I can see the NYT headlines: "President sits on his hands while Syria burns" or similar tripe.

He hasn't even given the rebellion a shred of support - what kind of leadership is that?

Answer one question, and I want details...

HOW are you going to PAY for this?

And we must face the fact that the United States is neither omnipotent or omniscient - that we are only six percent of the world's population - that we cannot impose our will upon the other ninety-four percent of mankind - that we cannot right every wrong or reverse each adversity - and that therefore there cannot be an American solution to every world problem.”
President John F. Kennedy
 
we cannot right every wrong or reverse each adversity

But that's just that: the US does not "right every wrong". The US create "wrongs" and then use it as a pre-text to step in in order to "solve" them and stay. It's called -- managed chaos.

As for, how the US will pay for all that? Simple: the FR will print more of the mickey mouse money! What does it matter, few trillions more, few trillions less... After all, YOU, the American citizens will have to pick up the debt, and no one any longer pretends it can be paid off in the next few hundred years. The US is BANKRUPT. What your elites are trying to do is to delay the inevitable by plundering not only the "small fish" like Libya, Iraq, Iran, but the big catch -- Russia and China!
 
Why is Obama standing by?

Because every time he sits down the right complain about it.

I'm just saying if we went into Libya as a humanitarian mission then the situation in Syria is much worse. Anyhow it would be fair to say that we are much worse off from a foreign pokicy standpoint, from the time Obama took office. I can't think of ONE THING he's done right, can you? Hes blundered Egypt, Iran, n Korea, and now of course Syria. We are back before the days Carter was booted out on his ass.

Two Proper Nouns..

Russia
China
 
Who told you that the Syrian government (RECENTLY ELECTED!) is "slaughtering it's own people"? Your media that serve the needs of the elites who are interested in whipping up your hysteria in support of them destroying yet another nation?!

Congratulations idiot asshole, you are now IGNORED.

.

So, was it a "Yes" in answer to my question? Thank you.
 
While the Syrian government is slaughtering it's own people? Doesn't the rules that led the US to intervene in Libya also apply here, if not to a greater extent?

The Slaughter being made now in Syria is nothing compared to the future slaughtering once Assad feels he has nothing to lose. and after he falls.
 
obama is scared shitless of Russia. Assad isn't failing.

Assad has been moving his chemical weapons out of storage. He's getting ready to take off the kid gloves against the muslim brotherhood.

Syria has begun moving its chemical weapons stockpile out of storage, U.S. warns | Mail Online

When Russia was prevented from delivering attack helicopters by the witholding of insurance they're sending them with a military escort.


Russian ship with helicopters for Syrian regime sets sail again - Telegraph

obama is a floundering lightweight splashing around in the shallow end of the pool.
 
Assad has been moving his chemical weapons out of storage.

When Russia was prevented from delivering attack helicopters by the witholding of insurance they're sending them with a military escort.

It's the same bull as WMD in Iraq. Syrian government isn't "moving" anything anywhere.

Russian ships are already on their way to Syria with those helicopters and much more. This time they are going under Russian insurance. And protection.
 
Unlike the scumbag in this thread, here's a person who actually knows the syrian regime:

Ex-Syrian ambassador calls for foreign military intervention - CNN.com

Ex-Syrian ambassador calls for foreign military intervention

By Ivan Watson and Samya Ayish , CNN
updated 2:02 PM EDT, Sun July 15, 2012
CNN.com

Doha, Qatar (CNN) -- The most senior Syrian diplomat to defect and publicly embrace his country's uprising is calling for a foreign military intervention to topple President Bashar al-Assad. He also accused the Damascus regime of collaborating with al Qaeda militants against opponents both in Syria and in neighboring Iraq.

"I support military intervention because I know the nature of this regime," Nawaf al-Fares told CNN. "This regime will only go by force."

"The Syrian regime felt threatened and felt that it, too, might fall," Fares recalled. "So they had an agreement with al Qaeda to keep the road open to Iraq. The militants started coming from all over the world through Syria, under the eyes of the Syrian secret police, which are directly responsible for the killing of thousands of Iraqis in Iraq as well as Americans and coalition forces."The secret police were encouraging enthusiastic young people in Syria to go for jihad in Iraq and join al Qaeda," Fares continued. "Bashar al-Assad and his security forces are directly responsible for the killing of thousands and thousands of Iraqis and coalition forces, because he gave al Qaeda everything it needed. He trained and provided shelter and he built safe havens for them to hide in.""
 
Last edited:
Ex-Syrian ambassador calls for foreign military intervention

Brilliant!

What would you call any of US ambassadors who would invite foreign military to invade the US?
Abdelhakim Belhaj (Abu Abdallah al-Sadek) -- top Libyan rebel military commander, Al-Q asset and the founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group; Zakhaev -- orchestrated slaughter of children in Beslan, etc...

Just serves to show what a fine collection of scum-bags the US associates itself with.
 
Anyway... Why is Obama and all of the civilised international community are standing by when human rights and the democracy itself are under threat in Papua New Guinea?!

"The natives of Papua New Guinea without hesitation choped up and ate the opposition. In any case, the local population not wanting to end up in a soup, has decided to ignore the general elections - well, screw such freedom of expression!" (el-murid)
 
Last edited:
We went into Libya because the guy leading the country authored the deaths of over 150 Americans in Lockerbie, Scotland.

Don't forget Obama also saw fit to arm rebels with weapons before first checking to see whether those rebels had any anti-American sentiment... Nice job Mr. Soetoro!:clap2:
 
While the Syrian government is slaughtering it's own people? Doesn't the rules that led the US to intervene in Libya also apply here, if not to a greater extent?

he wants to give the republicans something different to bitch about.
 
We went into Libya because the guy leading the country authored the deaths of over 150 Americans in Lockerbie, Scotland.

Don't forget Obama also saw fit to arm rebels with weapons before first checking to see whether those rebels had any anti-American sentiment... Nice job Mr. Soetoro!:clap2:

no matter what Obama does you will whine and bitch. why don't you get out from in front of the computer and show us how it is done.
 

Forum List

Back
Top