Why is it that so many conservatives are no longer interested in conserving natural resources?

To the OP. Pollution is bad, we should stop polluting the planet.

pollution does not cause climate change, it causes dirty air and water.

climate is controlled by the sun, the earth's tilt on its axis, and ocean currents---none of which can be affected by man.

if you libs want a cause, make it pollution, but don't continue the lie about man made climate change.,

Humans are never going to stop polluting under any circumstances because waste byproducts are the end result of mining, refining, and using natural resources and the manufacturing process. The trick is to minimize the impact through wise use management and also to find uses for the waste or to reintegrate them into the natural environment in a considerably less destructive manner.

Here's the point that seems to be lost on cons who have a difficult time understanding concepts. And excess of anything can potentially be destructive. Take water for example. It's necessary for life. But too much water can ruin crops, overwhelm treatment plants, cause floods and mudslides and devastate a community. The same is true of gases like carbon dioxide. Too much CO2 in your home could render you unconscious and even kill you. Too much CO2 in the atmosphere traps heat. It's science 101.

I look to your post and want to scream.

I have worked so long to make conservation a joy for people. You just are a piss off asshole.

First thing you do is get rid of people. you insult people. special.and all you want to do is insult anyone who could even come close to you.
Odd. I read your posts and can't help but laugh.
 
To the OP. Pollution is bad, we should stop polluting the planet.

pollution does not cause climate change, it causes dirty air and water.

climate is controlled by the sun, the earth's tilt on its axis, and ocean currents---none of which can be affected by man.

if you libs want a cause, make it pollution, but don't continue the lie about man made climate change.,

Humans are never going to stop polluting under any circumstances because waste byproducts are the end result of mining, refining, and using natural resources and the manufacturing process. The trick is to minimize the impact through wise use management and also to find uses for the waste or to reintegrate them into the natural environment in a considerably less destructive manner.

Here's the point that seems to be lost on cons who have a difficult time understanding concepts. And excess of anything can potentially be destructive. Take water for example. It's necessary for life. But too much water can ruin crops, overwhelm treatment plants, cause floods and mudslides and devastate a community. The same is true of gases like carbon dioxide. Too much CO2 in your home could render you unconscious and even kill you. Too much CO2 in the atmosphere traps heat. It's science 101.

Another horrid far left analogy being used.

Human CO2 accounts for less than 1% of the CO2 in the atmosphere, that is failure of epic proportions when using such a horrid analogy.

Like many things it's the power of small concentrations of greenhouse gases that's at the heart of the problem.

That is not only factually incorrect, but also scientifically incorrect as CO2 does NOT drive climate...
 

Forum List

Back
Top