why is eot's dodging this simple question

[daws101]

Show one video where the roofline DOES NOT descend evenly you fuckwad. What the fuck are you ignorant, blind and stupid too? My God, the thing came down, without being hit by a plane, had only sporadic fires in the heavily fortified building, NIST admitted to free fall after they fucking tried to conceal it, AFTER they explained in detail the impossibility of free fall because of the resistance of the buildings mass, and now you get some bullshit form some assholes who posted on a site that the building somehow came down in stages?? With no observable distortions being visable on the outside?? What fucking video are you and they watching?

Look, the building came down in a time that would only be conceivable if the resisting mass was removed, period. Gravity only collapses come down in staggered sequences, usually leaning to the weakest links of the structure, and no where near free fall times.


Oh I see...sorta like when you dumbfucks were all saying the steel melted then changed it to only weakened....Hey dumbfuck...the walls were connected to the steel columns and beams, and didn't show any sign of distortion. So how can "those collapsing beams" be "still clinging to the walls" without the walls of the building IE: like the OUTSIDE WALLS, not showing any indication of this "collapsing"? You admit to the columns and beams being connected and "clinging" to the walls, yet you think its perfectly normal for these massive steel components to just be hiding and collapsing inside while attached to the walls and the facade, and the walls and facade keeping it all a big secret??? You have no fucking brain. It is astonishing how the fuck you function as a member of the human race with an empty cavern where a brain should be.

Time? Really? How did all of these 3 forces have the time to do their works if the first 100 stories fell at free fall speed? This is the point of the problem...there has to be time for these forces to overcome the MASSIVE resistance from ALLL those beams and columns.

BULLSHIT! They weren't sticks asshole! Nor were they spaghetti, or linguini or your favorite pasta either, you ignorant fucking stooge! They were STEEL, and if you had any sense you would learn about the properties of STEEL, and what it takes to overcome its strength, instead of posting some bullshit that avoids the facts about it altogether.



Even the NIST computer simulation for WTC 7 shows how the columns gave way allowing the building to fall! Holy shit you really picked some BS site that really fucks things up assbackward didn't you?

No proof of any of the constant temps, at all the support points, at the precise times, for the required length of times to produce the WTC fall! What was there, that produced these high temps? You know, the ones that were melting in the rubble piles for 3 months? See...you can't have it both ways fuckwad. You can't say there were no massive temps in the rubble piles, and that it is all a lie, then try to use the "high temperatures" to explain the "destruction" of the WTC. So what caused the high temps? And how did these "high temperatures" manage NOT to dissipate as steel normally does to heat? How did the "high temps" remain concentrated on the support points to cause the rapid falling times of all the buildings?



Seriously "Tons of flaming debris"? "Smash into the south face"?? 'Creating HUGE gashes"? Where?? And why did NIST say these over exaggerating details were of no significance in the demise of WTC 7?

You couldn't have picked a more disingenuous write up of BS exaggerating talking points with no scientific backing to reply to your own BS thread.
Seems like you tried to call out Eots and instead you make a damn fool out of yourself yet again. Nice job Dawgshit. Totally stupid but you never fail to entertain..Oh shit I needed a good laugh thanks...

still no answer to the op.

but lots of rationalizing !


damn funny !


10. Some people have said that a failure at one column should not have produced a symmetrical fall like this one. What is NIST’s answer to those assertions?

WTC 7's collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.

FAQs - NIST WTC 7 Investigation

"did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit." : appear seem to have an outward aspect : to appear to the observation or understanding
not did fall as one unit.

This better explains a CD then destruction by sporadic fires on certain floors. It does not provide a satisfactory explanation of a building that fell with many characteristics of a CD,
but is being blamed on sporadic fires. It obvious you never worked with intense heat or steel and understand how steel dissipates heat and spreads it to connecting steel parts, thus cooling the affected part in the first place. Only high, intense heat at precise points in the supporting structure could cause it to fall like a CD. All you are doing is describing what a CD to the support beams and columns did, while leaving out facts about the steel, and the time a fire would take to over come its strength.
Larry discussing a CD with his insurance company is a tell tale sign..Perhaps the CD industry could eliminate using all the fancy devices that are needed and currently employed and use a few fires...think of the overhead savings..

dodge!
and another false assumption:"It obvious you never worked with intense heat or steel and understand how steel dissipates heat and spreads it to connecting steel parts, thus cooling the affected part in the first place" -sister jones
this statement is rock solid evidence of your ignorance.
in my work you have to have a welding certificate and a pyro cert, electricians license just to name a few ...

 

[LA RAM FAN]

someone farted in here.