why is bin Laden still at large 10 years after9/11?

Status
Not open for further replies.

ginscpy

Senior Member
Sep 10, 2010
7,950
228
48
I dont get it

Hiding in mountainous region my azz

We are the freaking country that put a man on the moonin 10 years - yet we cant capture the mst wanted person in theworld in10 years
 
George W. Bush




Blame Bush? Are you ignorant lefties even aware of what is going on or do you think whatever George Soros tells you to think? The WTT was attacked during Clinton's first term and he ignored it. According to some accounts the terrorists might have brought the building(s) down if they positioned the van loaded with explosives closer to a supporting column. Clinton ignored it and finally sent 25 Million dollars worth of missiles at a asprin factory in Sudan and an empty compound in Afghanistan. Clinton was bombing Europe while the 9-11 terrorisrs were going to flight school in the US. Clinton was offered Ben Ladin but he turned it down while he was diddling the intern under the desk. Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.
 
George W. Bush




Blame Bush? Are you ignorant lefties even aware of what is going on or do you think whatever George Soros tells you to think? The WTT was attacked during Clinton's first term and he ignored it. According to some accounts the terrorists might have brought the building(s) down if they positioned the van loaded with explosives closer to a supporting column. Clinton ignored it and finally sent 25 Million dollars worth of missiles at a asprin factory in Sudan and an empty compound in Afghanistan. Clinton was bombing Europe while the 9-11 terrorisrs were going to flight school in the US. Clinton was offered Ben Ladin but he turned it down while he was diddling the intern under the desk. Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

I love how stupid people seem to blame everyone but who was really responable for 9/11. It was Muslim extremists, not Bill Clinton or W.
 
George W. Bush




Blame Bush? Are you ignorant lefties even aware of what is going on or do you think whatever George Soros tells you to think? The WTT was attacked during Clinton's first term and he ignored it. According to some accounts the terrorists might have brought the building(s) down if they positioned the van loaded with explosives closer to a supporting column. Clinton ignored it and finally sent 25 Million dollars worth of missiles at a asprin factory in Sudan and an empty compound in Afghanistan. Clinton was bombing Europe while the 9-11 terrorisrs were going to flight school in the US. Clinton was offered Ben Ladin but he turned it down while he was diddling the intern under the desk. Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

I love how stupid people seem to blame everyone but who was really responable for 9/11. It was Muslim extremists, not Bill Clinton or W.

The word "negligence" (or criminal negligence) is more appropriate to use than "responsibility". In his first seven months Bush was dealing with Clinton appointees in the FBI and the CIA and stupid (criminally negligent) memos (which were still in effect) by the Clinton A.G. regarding the sharing of information between the the agencies.
 
Blame Bush? Are you ignorant lefties even aware of what is going on or do you think whatever George Soros tells you to think? The WTT was attacked during Clinton's first term and he ignored it. According to some accounts the terrorists might have brought the building(s) down if they positioned the van loaded with explosives closer to a supporting column. Clinton ignored it and finally sent 25 Million dollars worth of missiles at a asprin factory in Sudan and an empty compound in Afghanistan. Clinton was bombing Europe while the 9-11 terrorisrs were going to flight school in the US. Clinton was offered Ben Ladin but he turned it down while he was diddling the intern under the desk. Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

I love how stupid people seem to blame everyone but who was really responable for 9/11. It was Muslim extremists, not Bill Clinton or W.

The word "negligence" (or criminal negligence) is more appropriate to use than "responsibility". In his first seven months Bush was dealing with Clinton appointees in the FBI and the CIA and stupid (criminally negligent) memos (which were still in effect) by the Clinton A.G. regarding the sharing of information between the the agencies.

So your saying Clinton's AG is to blame for a bunch of cave dewellers learning how to fly planes and attacking the US
 
he is still on the CIA payroll, right?

I mean who paid for those monkey bars anyway?

alqaeda_training_camp1.jpg
 
And how do we know he's still at large? He could be deader than dirt for all we know.
 
I love how stupid people seem to blame everyone but who was really responable for 9/11. It was Muslim extremists, not Bill Clinton or W.

The word "negligence" (or criminal negligence) is more appropriate to use than "responsibility". In his first seven months Bush was dealing with Clinton appointees in the FBI and the CIA and stupid (criminally negligent) memos (which were still in effect) by the Clinton A.G. regarding the sharing of information between the the agencies.

So your saying Clinton's AG is to blame for a bunch of cave dewellers learning how to fly planes and attacking the US

I'm saying that the Clinton administration was criminally negligent. The fix was in in the congressional hearings. The ass't A.G. who created the memo was on the panel instead of being called as a witness. Whats more many of the 9-11 terrorists were illegally in the Country and it seems that at least one FBI agent was desperately trying to alert the government about the situation but nobody (in the Clinton administration) listened.
 
The word "negligence" (or criminal negligence) is more appropriate to use than "responsibility". In his first seven months Bush was dealing with Clinton appointees in the FBI and the CIA and stupid (criminally negligent) memos (which were still in effect) by the Clinton A.G. regarding the sharing of information between the the agencies.

So your saying Clinton's AG is to blame for a bunch of cave dewellers learning how to fly planes and attacking the US

I'm saying that the Clinton administration was criminally negligent. The fix was in in the congressional hearings. The ass't A.G. who created the memo was on the panel instead of being called as a witness. Whats more many of the 9-11 terrorists were illegally in the Country and it seems that at least one FBI agent was desperately trying to alert the government about the situation but nobody (in the Clinton administration) listened.

to blame Clinton is to think the president is involed in every small detail of US intelligence. The failure was across the board, the CIA, FBI, Immigration, Bush and Clinton
 
I love how stupid people seem to blame everyone but who was really responable for 9/11. It was Muslim extremists, not Bill Clinton or W.

The word "negligence" (or criminal negligence) is more appropriate to use than "responsibility". In his first seven months Bush was dealing with Clinton appointees in the FBI and the CIA and stupid (criminally negligent) memos (which were still in effect) by the Clinton A.G. regarding the sharing of information between the the agencies.

So your saying Clinton's AG is to blame for a bunch of cave dewellers learning how to fly planes and attacking the US

I'll say it. Yes! Clinton warned Bush about Al Kaida and Osama Bin Ladin. Bin Ladin was no secret to Clinton. All of the preparation for 9/11 happened on Clinton's watch. Clinton and Bush are both responsible.
 
Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

The same can be said of the economic meltdown. Bush was in office for 8 years, but he can't be blamed a meltdown that actually occurred on his watch. 8 years. And, unlike Clinton, he had congress for 6 years.

During Clinton, the GOP congress of adulterers and wide stancers and pedophiles were more worried about Monica Lewinsky than they were about Al Qaeda. Every time Clinton did anything militarily, they accused him of "Wag the Dog". They didn't want him fighting wars, they wanted to handcuff him with investigations.

Newt Gingrich was on the news every night talking about Lewinsky. He desperately did not want to change the subject and have the country rally behind a war president.

What about the Cole bombing Newt? Nope, can't talk about that. Clinton can't escape Monica that easy. If it was so obvious that we were at war, than why didn't the most vocal Congress in history mention it? How is it possible that this congress of pedophiles and adulterers was talking about a sexual affair when we were at war?

How is it possible that they dominated the news so thoroughly with Lewinsky while we were at war?


(They didn't want the national discussion to be about war. They didn't want the nation to rally behind a war president? They only wanted to talk about Lewinsky)

Never once did the most activist and vocal congressional revolution in history speak about terrorism. They paralyzed government with investigation after investigation. Imagine if they had pushed Clinton to move on Al Qaeda as much as they hunted him over Lewinsky? Imagine if they had once shown a concern for Al Qaeda? The Gingrich Revolution was emphatically against moving the focus from Bin Laden to Lewinsky.

We were at war with Al Qaeda, and -- somehow -- the GOP was at war with the commander and chief.

Richard Clarke, the terrorist czar under Reagan, HW, and Clinton was ignored by the Bush administration. He was the most knowledgeable person in Washington on terrorism - that's why Reagan hired him. Bush ignored him, then fired him. It didn't help that he was making trouble for the dark universe of oil (and the overlapping business interests that connect the party of big oil with the Saudi Royals).

The Bush administration was told about the likelihood of Bin Laden flying planes into skyscrapers and they ignored it. Rather than having planes on high alert, they did nothing. The hijacked planes were off course for an hour and the Bush administration, having just been warned, did nothing.

The Bush administration knew who attacked us immediately. They knew it was Bin Laden, and they said as much. The only people they let out of the country after the attacks was Bin Laden's family. No questions asked. If Obama did anything close to this, he would be investigated and impeached.

Again: they fired the terrorism czar who warned them about Bin Laden. They were begged to take the threat seriously. They ignored it just like they ignored the housing bubble and the derivative time bomb. They destroyed the country.

Everything happened on Bush's watch. 9/11 and the meltdown. But nothing is his fault. Clinton and Obama are somehow responsible for everything that happened during the Bush presidency.
 
Last edited:
Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

The same can be said of the economic meltdown. Bush was in office for 8 years, but he can't be blamed a meltdown that actually occurred on his watch. 8 years. And, unlike Clinton, he had congress for 6 years.

During Clinton, the GOP congress of adulterers and wide stancers and pedophiles were more worried about Monica Lewinsky than they were about Al Qaeda. Every time Clinton did anything militarily, they accused him of "Wag the Dog". They didn't want him fighting wars, they wanted to handcuff him with investigations.

Newt Gingrich was on the news every night talking about Lewinsky. He desperately did not want to change the subject and have the country rally behind a war president.

What about the Cole bombing Newt? Nope, can't talk about that. Clinton can't get off the hook that easy.

Never once did the most vocal congressional revolution in history speak about terrorism. They paralyzed government with investigation after investigation. Imagine if they had pushed Clinton to move on Al Qaeda as much as they hunted him over Lewinsky? Imagine if they had once shown a concern for Al Qaeda. The Gingrich Revolution was emphatically not fighting Bin Laden; it was fighting Clinton. That was the only goal, and America paid for it.

Richard Clarke, the terrorist czar under Reagan, HW, and Clinton was ignored by the Bush administration. He was the most knowledgeable person in Washington on terrorism - that's why Reagan hired him. Bush ignored him. The Bushies fired him because he was making trouble for the Carlye Group and the dark nexus of overlapping oil interests that connected members of planet Bush to the Saudi royals.

The Bush administration was told about the likelihood of Bin Laden flying planes into skyscrapers and they ignored it. Rather than having planes on high alert, they did nothing. The hijacked planes were off course for an hour and the Bush administration, having just been warned, did nothing.

The Bush administration knew who attacked us immediately. They knew it was Bin Laden, and they said as much. The only people they let out of the country after the attacks was Bin Laden's family. No questions asked.

Again: they fired the terrorism czar who warned them about Bin Laden. They were begged to take the threat seriously. They ignored it just like they ignored the housing bubble and the derivative time bomb. They destroyed the country.

I woudn't say W destroyed to county but he sure did a whole lot of bad, a whole lot of it.
 
Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

The same can be said of the economic meltdown. Bush was in office for 8 years, but he can't be blamed a meltdown that actually occurred on his watch. 8 years. And, unlike Clinton, he had congress for 6 years.

During Clinton, the GOP congress of adulterers and wide stancers and pedophiles were more worried about Monica Lewinsky than they were about Al Qaeda. Every time Clinton did anything militarily, they accused him of "Wag the Dog". They didn't want him fighting wars, they wanted to handcuff him with investigations.

Newt Gingrich was on the news every night talking about Lewinsky. He desperately did not want to change the subject and have the country rally behind a war president.

What about the Cole bombing Newt? Nope, can't talk about that. Clinton can't escape Monica that easy.

Never once did the most activist and vocal congressional revolution in history speak about terrorism. They paralyzed government with investigation after investigation. Imagine if they had pushed Clinton to move on Al Qaeda as much as they hunted him over Lewinsky? Imagine if they had once shown a concern for Al Qaeda. The Gingrich Revolution was emphatically not fighting Bin Laden; it was fighting Clinton. That was the only goal, and America paid for it.

Richard Clarke, the terrorist czar under Reagan, HW, and Clinton was ignored by the Bush administration. He was the most knowledgeable person in Washington on terrorism - that's why Reagan hired him. Bush ignored him. The Bushies fired him because he was making trouble for the Carlye Group and the dark nexus of overlapping oil interests that connected members of planet Bush to the Saudi royals.

The Bush administration was told about the likelihood of Bin Laden flying planes into skyscrapers and they ignored it. Rather than having planes on high alert, they did nothing. The hijacked planes were off course for an hour and the Bush administration, having just been warned, did nothing.

The Bush administration knew who attacked us immediately. They knew it was Bin Laden, and they said as much. The only people they let out of the country after the attacks was Bin Laden's family. No questions asked.

Again: they fired the terrorism czar who warned them about Bin Laden. They were begged to take the threat seriously. They ignored it just like they ignored the housing bubble and the derivative time bomb. They destroyed the country.
^^^ complete and utter BULLSHIT
 
Bush was in office seven months when 9-11 happened. Clinton was in office eight years.

The same can be said of the economic meltdown. Bush was in office for 8 years, but he can't be blamed a meltdown that actually occurred on his watch. 8 years. And, unlike Clinton, he had congress for 6 years.

During Clinton, the GOP congress of adulterers and wide stancers and pedophiles were more worried about Monica Lewinsky than they were about Al Qaeda. Every time Clinton did anything militarily, they accused him of "Wag the Dog". They didn't want him fighting wars, they wanted to handcuff him with investigations.

Newt Gingrich was on the news every night talking about Lewinsky. He desperately did not want to change the subject and have the country rally behind a war president.

What about the Cole bombing Newt? Nope, can't talk about that. Clinton can't escape Monica that easy.

Never once did the most activist and vocal congressional revolution in history speak about terrorism. They paralyzed government with investigation after investigation. Imagine if they had pushed Clinton to move on Al Qaeda as much as they hunted him over Lewinsky? Imagine if they had once shown a concern for Al Qaeda. The Gingrich Revolution was emphatically not fighting Bin Laden; it was fighting Clinton. That was the only goal, and America paid for it.

Richard Clarke, the terrorist czar under Reagan, HW, and Clinton was ignored by the Bush administration. He was the most knowledgeable person in Washington on terrorism - that's why Reagan hired him. Bush ignored him. The Bushies fired him because he was making trouble for the Carlye Group and the dark nexus of overlapping oil interests that connected members of planet Bush to the Saudi royals.

The Bush administration was told about the likelihood of Bin Laden flying planes into skyscrapers and they ignored it. Rather than having planes on high alert, they did nothing. The hijacked planes were off course for an hour and the Bush administration, having just been warned, did nothing.

The Bush administration knew who attacked us immediately. They knew it was Bin Laden, and they said as much. The only people they let out of the country after the attacks was Bin Laden's family. No questions asked.

Again: they fired the terrorism czar who warned them about Bin Laden. They were begged to take the threat seriously. They ignored it just like they ignored the housing bubble and the derivative time bomb. They destroyed the country.
^^^ complete and utter BULLSHIT

Divecon your face is complete and utter BULLSHIT you tool
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top