Why I want a democratic landslide

[tjvh]

I don't want to burn my hand because it hurts, so the answer is to pour gasoline onto my hand then ignite it so eventually it wont hurt... Not my idea of logic.

 

[Dissent]

Bring the whole damn thing crashing down...

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Didn't this guy just whine about wanting big gubmint to step in and protect worker wages at Walmart?

But now he wants such protections destroyed?


LOL

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

Well, a lot of active libertarians have been pushing the ideological boundaries for years and the majority do not want to budge from the one party system. Which is already "so bad and so powerful" that any dissent is squashed. Nothing shy of cheating. Libertarians live by the nonaggression principles. But that does not mean self defense is off the table, and that means if the state, which is already totalitarian in nature threatens existence, there is but one option left...and it isn't protesting or organizing a sit in.

 

[SniperFire]

Didn't this guy just whine about wanting big gubmint to step in and protect worker wages at Walmart?

But now he wants such protections destroyed?


LOL

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

Well, a lot of active libertarians have been pushing the ideological boundaries for years and the majority do not want to budge from the one party system. Which is already "so bad and so powerful" that any dissent is squashed. Nothing shy of cheating. Libertarians live by the nonaggression principles. But that does not mean self defense is off the table, and that means if the state, which is already totalitarian in nature threatens existence, there is but one option left...and it isn't protesting or organizing a sit in.

If I may paraphrase, you narco-Libertarians live by nonaggression principles, unless you are calling for violent overthrow of America.


LOL

 

[Oddball]

He's implying justified retaliation against totalitarian aggressors, you neocon nitwit.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Didn't this guy just whine about wanting big gubmint to step in and protect worker wages at Walmart?

But now he wants such protections destroyed?


LOL

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

I am quite open about that...That's what I want and I know we will get it as well.Part of the reason I want Obama re elected because he will speed the process up.

Anarchist. The dimwits will move this country deeper into socialism.

 

[Oddball]

[
Anarchist. The dimwits will move this country deeper into socialism.

G'head and name something that republiturds have done to roll back socialism....Just one thing.

 

[occupied]

Bring the whole damn thing crashing down...

The thing about crashes, the poor are always used harshly to soften the impact if not blamed directly and the culprits always have their asses covered and are in a position to turn it into a windfall. If there is a crash, look at who comes out on top, it was pretty clear in 2008 when the big banks barely had a dip in their profits while the country suffered.

 

[Dissent]

Lol...gotta break things down into simple terms for shitfire there LOL>...

 

[Dissent]

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

I am quite open about that...That's what I want and I know we will get it as well.Part of the reason I want Obama re elected because he will speed the process up.

Anarchist. The dimwits will move this country deeper into socialism.

Mixture of National Anarchist/Anarcho Capitalist.

 

[martybegan]

Didn't this guy just whine about wanting big gubmint to step in and protect worker wages at Walmart?

But now he wants such protections destroyed?


LOL

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

Well, a lot of active libertarians have been pushing the ideological boundaries for years and the majority do not want to budge from the one party system. Which is already "so bad and so powerful" that any dissent is squashed. Nothing shy of cheating. Libertarians live by the nonaggression principles. But that does not mean self defense is off the table, and that means if the state, which is already totalitarian in nature threatens existence, there is but one option left...and it isn't protesting or organizing a sit in.

The one thing they havent done yet is man the barricades. if things are so bad why havent we seen revolt already occuring? And I dont mean the occasional soverign citizen or milita group basically fighting the local authorities over property taxes, I mean a real, serious effort to overthrow the government?

 

[AmericanFirst]

[
Anarchist. The dimwits will move this country deeper into socialism.

G'head and name something that republiturds have done to roll back socialism....Just one thing.

The patriot act.

 

[SniperFire]

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

Well, a lot of active libertarians have been pushing the ideological boundaries for years and the majority do not want to budge from the one party system. Which is already "so bad and so powerful" that any dissent is squashed. Nothing shy of cheating. Libertarians live by the nonaggression principles. But that does not mean self defense is off the table, and that means if the state, which is already totalitarian in nature threatens existence, there is but one option left...and it isn't protesting or organizing a sit in.

The one thing they havent done yet is man the barricades. if things are so bad why havent we seen revolt already occuring? And I dont mean the occasional soverign citizen or milita group basically fighting the local authorities over property taxes, I mean a real, serious effort to overthrow the government?

Because it is a ruse. The material well-being of the poor and middle class have increased 50% since 1980.

Our poor people in America struggle with obesity.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

[
Anarchist. The dimwits will move this country deeper into socialism.

G'head and name something that republiturds have done to roll back socialism....Just one thing.

The patriot act.

What does the Patriot Act have to do with Socialism?

 

[Avatar4321]

Why I Want a Democratic Landslide by Chris Kahn

I want the same but for some of the same and for different reasons..overall it will accomplish the same thing...the destruction of this police state.

So empowering a President creating a police state is somehow going to destroy that police state? That makes so much sense.

You realize that if the nation goes further over the cliff, that will give them all the more reason to seize control, right?

 

[martybegan]

Well, a lot of active libertarians have been pushing the ideological boundaries for years and the majority do not want to budge from the one party system. Which is already "so bad and so powerful" that any dissent is squashed. Nothing shy of cheating. Libertarians live by the nonaggression principles. But that does not mean self defense is off the table, and that means if the state, which is already totalitarian in nature threatens existence, there is but one option left...and it isn't protesting or organizing a sit in.

The one thing they havent done yet is man the barricades. if things are so bad why havent we seen revolt already occuring? And I dont mean the occasional soverign citizen or milita group basically fighting the local authorities over property taxes, I mean a real, serious effort to overthrow the government?

Because it is a ruse. The material well-being of the poor and middle class have increased 50% since 1980.

Our poor people in America struggle with obesity.

That to me is why the lower classes are not revolting, but I would see a libertarian revolt coming from the upper middle and even upper classes, and having less to do with economic issues than ideological. Of course my history professor said all issues end up being economic ones (the important ones) so your point may be more valid than my view on this.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Social "justice", equality of outcomes, and a working mans utopia is right around the corner..............

All we need is a youthful revolution, the destruction of what is, and some marxist totalitarian hope and propaganda

 

[TakeAStepBack]

Evidently he's hoping for the revolution.

What (L)ibertarians often gloss over is that quite a few of them believe the system has to get so bad and the state so powerful, that armed revolution is the only answer.

Well, a lot of active libertarians have been pushing the ideological boundaries for years and the majority do not want to budge from the one party system. Which is already "so bad and so powerful" that any dissent is squashed. Nothing shy of cheating. Libertarians live by the nonaggression principles. But that does not mean self defense is off the table, and that means if the state, which is already totalitarian in nature threatens existence, there is but one option left...and it isn't protesting or organizing a sit in.

The one thing they havent done yet is man the barricades. if things are so bad why havent we seen revolt already occuring? And I dont mean the occasional soverign citizen or milita group basically fighting the local authorities over property taxes, I mean a real, serious effort to overthrow the government?

Things haven't spiraled to the piont where the average citizens feels the pinch hard enough. Like most of history, this is always the case. They only react after it is far too late. From my perspective, there will be no "overthrow" of the government in some hollywood movie fashion that I'm sure is running threw the minds of many. the state will implode upon itself and from there, the economic deterioration will lead to protectionist measures that will cause the black markets to rise up and choke the state even more.

In other words, it's going to get a lot worse before anything changes.

 

[Avatar4321]

Bring the whole damn thing crashing down...

And then the blood of millions and possibly billions will be on your hands. That's not exactly something I want on my hands.

 

[SniperFire]

The one thing they havent done yet is man the barricades. if things are so bad why havent we seen revolt already occuring? And I dont mean the occasional soverign citizen or milita group basically fighting the local authorities over property taxes, I mean a real, serious effort to overthrow the government?

Because it is a ruse. The material well-being of the poor and middle class have increased 50% since 1980.

Our poor people in America struggle with obesity.

That to me is why the lower classes are not revolting, but I would see a libertarian revolt coming from the upper middle and even upper classes, and having less to do with economic issues than ideological. Of course my history professor said all issues end up being economic ones (the important ones) so your point may be more valid than my view on this.

A Libertarian revolt from the upper and middle classes would probably look like Newt Gingrich.