Why I like Susan Collins

Flaylo

Handsome Devil
Feb 10, 2010
5,899
745
98
In some grass near you
Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers


But Collins, often a maverick in her party, made a telling departure from the prevailing orthodoxy, arguing that job creators and the rich are not one and the same, and that actual job creators are businesses, such as small corporations and partnerships, that hire people."What I've been looking at is can you carve out those businesses from the surtax, and you can," Collins told reporters just outside the Senate chamber, explaining that there's a difference between working enterprises and idle rich.

"There is already a body of well-developed law in the tax code having to do with active business participation versus passive business participation," she said.

"I think that's the answer to this dilemma. I do not want to impose additional taxes on the employers at a time when our economy is very fragile and we want to encourage them to hire," Collins said. "On the other hand, I do believe that multimillionaires and billionaires who are not running businesses could pay more of their income to help us deal with the deficit."

Basically, the "hurting the job creators" excuse is out of the door, not to mention that the Bush tax cuts produded no created jobs.

By the way, its telling that the Repugs are now saying that tax cuts have to be paid for when they've been arguing before that they don't have to be paid and or that they pay for themselves- but only when it comes to a tax cut for the middle class that doesn't involve the rich. If they want to pay for the tax cut, take Obama's plan to keep the Bush tax cuts for the Middle class intact and let the tax cut for the top 1-2% expire.
 
Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers


But Collins, often a maverick in her party, made a telling departure from the prevailing orthodoxy, arguing that job creators and the rich are not one and the same, and that actual job creators are businesses, such as small corporations and partnerships, that hire people."What I've been looking at is can you carve out those businesses from the surtax, and you can," Collins told reporters just outside the Senate chamber, explaining that there's a difference between working enterprises and idle rich.

"There is already a body of well-developed law in the tax code having to do with active business participation versus passive business participation," she said.

"I think that's the answer to this dilemma. I do not want to impose additional taxes on the employers at a time when our economy is very fragile and we want to encourage them to hire," Collins said. "On the other hand, I do believe that multimillionaires and billionaires who are not running businesses could pay more of their income to help us deal with the deficit."

Basically, the "hurting the job creators" excuse is out of the door, not to mention that the Bush tax cuts produded no created jobs.

By the way, its telling that the Repugs are now saying that tax cuts have to be paid for when they've been arguing before that they don't have to be paid and or that they pay for themselves- but only when it comes to a tax cut for the middle class that doesn't involve the rich. If they want to pay for the tax cut, take Obama's plan to keep the Bush tax cuts for the Middle class intact and let the tax cut for the top 1-2% expire.

I think your IQ can play hand ball against the curb. I guess its beyond your limited comprehension, like many left turds, when you tax some one you are reducing or lowering their purchasing power.
 
Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers


But Collins, often a maverick in her party, made a telling departure from the prevailing orthodoxy, arguing that job creators and the rich are not one and the same, and that actual job creators are businesses, such as small corporations and partnerships, that hire people."What I've been looking at is can you carve out those businesses from the surtax, and you can," Collins told reporters just outside the Senate chamber, explaining that there's a difference between working enterprises and idle rich.

"There is already a body of well-developed law in the tax code having to do with active business participation versus passive business participation," she said.

"I think that's the answer to this dilemma. I do not want to impose additional taxes on the employers at a time when our economy is very fragile and we want to encourage them to hire," Collins said. "On the other hand, I do believe that multimillionaires and billionaires who are not running businesses could pay more of their income to help us deal with the deficit."

Basically, the "hurting the job creators" excuse is out of the door, not to mention that the Bush tax cuts produded no created jobs.

By the way, its telling that the Repugs are now saying that tax cuts have to be paid for when they've been arguing before that they don't have to be paid and or that they pay for themselves- but only when it comes to a tax cut for the middle class that doesn't involve the rich. If they want to pay for the tax cut, take Obama's plan to keep the Bush tax cuts for the Middle class intact and let the tax cut for the top 1-2% expire.

I think your IQ can play hand ball against the curb. I guess its beyond your limited comprehension, like many left turds, when you tax some one you are reducing or lowering their purchasing power.

shut up troll, we're talking about billionaires and multimillionaires, fuck face
 
Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers




Basically, the "hurting the job creators" excuse is out of the door, not to mention that the Bush tax cuts produded no created jobs.

By the way, its telling that the Repugs are now saying that tax cuts have to be paid for when they've been arguing before that they don't have to be paid and or that they pay for themselves- but only when it comes to a tax cut for the middle class that doesn't involve the rich. If they want to pay for the tax cut, take Obama's plan to keep the Bush tax cuts for the Middle class intact and let the tax cut for the top 1-2% expire.

I think your IQ can play hand ball against the curb. I guess its beyond your limited comprehension, like many left turds, when you tax some one you are reducing or lowering their purchasing power.

shut up troll, we're talking about billionaires and multimillionaires, fuck face
no you delusional fuk, we are talking about bush taxes cuts as you referred mr amnesia and I tried to dumb it down for the learning impaired
 
Last edited:
Susan Collins is an archetypal RINO. Thus beloved by any leftist.
Who was it who said raising taxes during a recession was bad policy? Oh yeah, Obama.
 
Susan Collins is an archetypal RINO. Thus beloved by any leftist.
Who was it who said raising taxes during a recession was bad policy? Oh yeah, Obama.

You hooked nooses Askhenazis just don't see the ligh like us Sephardhim, you all act like Pharisees. Stop being greddy.
 
Man oh man, so they LOVE someone who wants to impose MORE taxes on the AMERCIAN citizens...cause damnit...US people aren't being bled ENOUGH for these greedy ass people and Government.
 
Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers


But Collins, often a maverick in her party, made a telling departure from the prevailing orthodoxy, arguing that job creators and the rich are not one and the same, and that actual job creators are businesses, such as small corporations and partnerships, that hire people."What I've been looking at is can you carve out those businesses from the surtax, and you can," Collins told reporters just outside the Senate chamber, explaining that there's a difference between working enterprises and idle rich.

"There is already a body of well-developed law in the tax code having to do with active business participation versus passive business participation," she said.

"I think that's the answer to this dilemma. I do not want to impose additional taxes on the employers at a time when our economy is very fragile and we want to encourage them to hire," Collins said. "On the other hand, I do believe that multimillionaires and billionaires who are not running businesses could pay more of their income to help us deal with the deficit."

Basically, the "hurting the job creators" excuse is out of the door, not to mention that the Bush tax cuts produded no created jobs.

By the way, its telling that the Repugs are now saying that tax cuts have to be paid for when they've been arguing before that they don't have to be paid and or that they pay for themselves- but only when it comes to a tax cut for the middle class that doesn't involve the rich. If they want to pay for the tax cut, take Obama's plan to keep the Bush tax cuts for the Middle class intact and let the tax cut for the top 1-2% expire.

I think your IQ can play hand ball against the curb. I guess its beyond your limited comprehension, like many left turds, when you tax some one you are reducing or lowering their purchasing power.

And you are complaining about IQ?

You are absolutely not hurting the purchasing power of someone making 20 million a year by raising their taxes.

There's only so much money one can spend in a year..or a life time.

And "the very rich" seldom risk their own money on new enterprise.
 
Man oh man, so they LOVE someone who wants to impose MORE taxes on the AMERCIAN citizens...cause damnit...US people aren't being bled ENOUGH for these greedy ass people and Government.

Money is not blood. The Constitution mandates revenue for the government be generated from taxes. And it makes sense to tax those who have benefitted most and use most of the government goods, infrastructure and services to accrue wealth.
 
Man oh man, so they LOVE someone who wants to impose MORE taxes on the AMERCIAN citizens...cause damnit...US people aren't being bled ENOUGH for these greedy ass people and Government.

Money is not blood. The Constitution mandates revenue for the government be generated from taxes. And it makes sense to tax those who have benefitted most and use most of the government goods, infrastructure and services to accrue wealth.


We do pay...to the STATES we live in.
 
Man oh man, so they LOVE someone who wants to impose MORE taxes on the AMERCIAN citizens...cause damnit...US people aren't being bled ENOUGH for these greedy ass people and Government.

Money is not blood. The Constitution mandates revenue for the government be generated from taxes. And it makes sense to tax those who have benefitted most and use most of the government goods, infrastructure and services to accrue wealth.


We do pay...to the STATES we live in.

The North won the civil war dear. The whole "State's rights" thing should have been settled back then..along with the slavery question.
 
Libs answer to any money problem is to TAX the rich. How but we cut some spending before you hit the RICH for even more money. They pay most of the taxes as it is. The Libs wont be happy until they take 100 percent of their income!
 
Libs answer to any money problem is to TAX the rich. How but we cut some spending before you hit the RICH for even more money. They pay most of the taxes as it is. The Libs wont be happy until they take 100 percent of their income!

90% is better. Like Eisenhower..you know..America's most famous liberal?

:lol:
 
Susan Collins is an archetypal RINO. Thus beloved by any leftist.
Who was it who said raising taxes during a recession was bad policy? Oh yeah, Obama.

You hooked nooses Askhenazis just don't see the ligh like us Sephardhim, you all act like Pharisees. Stop being greddy.

Go pan handle your socialism to china and rusia GOOD LUK ICEHOLE
 
Last edited:
Libs answer to any money problem is to TAX the rich. How but we cut some spending before you hit the RICH for even more money. They pay most of the taxes as it is. The Libs wont be happy until they take 100 percent of their income!

90% is better. Like Eisenhower..you know..America's most famous liberal?

:lol:

were is the reference point since it is so great.
 
Libs answer to any money problem is to TAX the rich. How but we cut some spending before you hit the RICH for even more money. They pay most of the taxes as it is. The Libs wont be happy until they take 100 percent of their income!

90% is better. Like Eisenhower..you know..America's most famous liberal?

:lol:

will they be free or controlled. don't go to the cheat'n zhitz at ws, clintoool removed glass stegal and bush remove the uptick rule.
seem like someone is controlling the banks, the ones taxpayers are bailing out .......I call BULLZHIT....
 
Last edited:
Sen. Susan Collins: Tax The Rich To Fund Payroll Tax Cut For Workers




Basically, the "hurting the job creators" excuse is out of the door, not to mention that the Bush tax cuts produded no created jobs.

By the way, its telling that the Repugs are now saying that tax cuts have to be paid for when they've been arguing before that they don't have to be paid and or that they pay for themselves- but only when it comes to a tax cut for the middle class that doesn't involve the rich. If they want to pay for the tax cut, take Obama's plan to keep the Bush tax cuts for the Middle class intact and let the tax cut for the top 1-2% expire.

I think your IQ can play hand ball against the curb. I guess its beyond your limited comprehension, like many left turds, when you tax some one you are reducing or lowering their purchasing power.

And you are complaining about IQ?

You are absolutely not hurting the purchasing power of someone making 20 million a year by raising their taxes.

There's only so much money one can spend in a year..or a life time.

And "the very rich" seldom risk their own money on new enterprise.

About dumbest analogy i've ran across in sometime but hey swallow knock yourself out in justifying why you are entitled to others wealth. In the meantime, i hope an 18 wheeler makes you part of the roadway in a permanent way
 

Forum List

Back
Top