Why I call the left commiecrats

Why I call the left commiecrats


I am already pretty sure why you made that up. You think it is cute. Gay people have a fascination with "cute" things. I bet you own a small yappy lap dog.

Well, that just proves your line of work ain't think'n.
 
Why I call the left commiecrats


I am already pretty sure why you made that up. You think it is cute. Gay people have a fascination with "cute" things. I bet you own a small yappy lap dog.

Communists? Do they not know that the Cold War is over? There are new enemies for them to be paranoid about.

Evidently not, the socialist and communist within the US continue to destroy our country. You might want to make sure Putin gets the memo also.
 
Why I call the left commiecrats


I am already pretty sure why you made that up. You think it is cute. Gay people have a fascination with "cute" things. I bet you own a small yappy lap dog.

Communists? Do they not know that the Cold War is over? There are new enemies for them to be paranoid about.

Evidently not, the socialist and communist within the US continue to destroy our country. You might want to make sure Putin gets the memo also.

^^^^^^
john-wayne.jpg
 
Had you read the link more thoroughly, OkTex-ass, you would have noticed this in the first paragraphs:

"Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:"

These communist goals are what some nutty woman in Florida in 1963 believed she obtained from an anti-communist book. These quotes are her interpretation of another's interpretation of communism.

What that has to do with the modern Democrat party I don't understand.

Tell me we're not doing virtually everything on the list. Tell me the left doesn't control education, media, Hollywood. Come on read the list and explain how it hasn't come to pass.
 
Communism is a socioeconomic system which centralizes ownership of property at the state, subjugates the pricing system to government dictat, and directs all allocation of capital.

References to gay rights, higher education, and children's sports is not evidence of a system that effectively bans all property rights. Get back to us when the Democrat party starts talking about banning the stock market.

You should learn what communism is first. The rest of the world and most Americans laugh at the American right when it makes such silly arguments.

Tell me, how would you go about installing such a system in a country like ours, without creating social and economic chaos? That's the plan, destroy the social and economic fabric of the country and it's easily conquered. Politician like your dear leader create problems then the claim they can fix them, of course the fixes always require sacrificing liberty, security or property and some require all of them. BTW if you think the fed printing 43 billion a month and buying bad mortgage bonds won't end up destroying the economy you might want to think again. As strong central bank is a pillar of communism.

No it is not. You don't know anything. The central bank in a communist state is under the complete power of the central government. It is weak by definition. As for money printing, Lenin noted that inflation destroys democracies, hardly a recipe for a guy running a country.

Right, printing money like it's going out of style, isn't inflationary, if you believe that I have some ocean front property for ya in Kansas. Inflation will destroy any country not just democracies, if Maobama had been hired as a CEO he wouldn't have lasted a year before being tossed out on his ass, everything he as done is antithetical to sound business practices. But he is just one cog in the leftist wheel.
 
I find it curious how conservatives have gone back to calling Democrats COMMIES

It was popular up until the end of the Cold War. Then the term became mostly irrelevant. Commies were no longer the Red Menace they once were. A new boogieman was needed.

After 9-11, that boogieman became terrorism. Now it became "Democrats are soft on terrorism!" With the election of Obama, it became very clear that Democrats are anything but soft on terrorism

So I guess they had to go back to the old reliable.....COMMIES!

Question: Do you consider FT Hood a terrorist attack or simple work place violence?
 
Tell me, how would you go about installing such a system in a country like ours, without creating social and economic chaos? That's the plan, destroy the social and economic fabric of the country and it's easily conquered. Politician like your dear leader create problems then the claim they can fix them, of course the fixes always require sacrificing liberty, security or property and some require all of them. BTW if you think the fed printing 43 billion a month and buying bad mortgage bonds won't end up destroying the economy you might want to think again. As strong central bank is a pillar of communism.

No it is not. You don't know anything. The central bank in a communist state is under the complete power of the central government. It is weak by definition. As for money printing, Lenin noted that inflation destroys democracies, hardly a recipe for a guy running a country.

Right, printing money like it's going out of style, isn't inflationary, if you believe that I have some ocean front property for ya in Kansas. Inflation will destroy any country not just democracies, if Maobama had been hired as a CEO he wouldn't have lasted a year before being tossed out on his ass, everything he as done is antithetical to sound business practices. But he is just one cog in the leftist wheel.

Way to completely miss the point. :thup:

Surprise, surprise.
 
I find it curious how conservatives have gone back to calling Democrats COMMIES

It was popular up until the end of the Cold War. Then the term became mostly irrelevant. Commies were no longer the Red Menace they once were. A new boogieman was needed.

After 9-11, that boogieman became terrorism. Now it became "Democrats are soft on terrorism!" With the election of Obama, it became very clear that Democrats are anything but soft on terrorism

So I guess they had to go back to the old reliable.....COMMIES!

Question: Do you consider FT Hood a terrorist attack or simple work place violence?

I don't think it is cut and dry terrorism. The guy had other issues with the Army
 

Forum List

Back
Top