Why Haven't House Dems Filed Complaints / Charges Against Wasserman-Schultz & Her Pakistan Spies?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by easyt65, Mar 19, 2018.

  1. easyt65
    Online

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    43,372
    Thanks Received:
    9,214
    Trophy Points:
    2,140
    Ratings:
    +47,629
    BLACKMAIL!

    'Debbie Does The House!'


    Wasserman-Schultz gave terrorist-connected Pakistani spies illegal access to classified House Files as well as to ever Democrats' e-mail, username, and password. Evidence show the Pakistanis downloaded / made off with TERA-bytes of information.....yet many Democrats were reluctant to fire them and refused to file charges / complaints about their e-mails being raided.

    Wasserman-Schultz was finally fired after her part was discovered, but Hillary IMMEDIATELY hired her that day to join her Election Campaign team... Hmmm.....



    A History Of Alleged Intimidation And Tampering In House Hacking Case Marked By Witnesses’ Silence

    The House Office of Inspector General claimed in late 2016 that the Awan family logged into members’ servers they had no business accessing, in some cases after they’d been fired. Prosecutors allege the family also ordered equipment – sometimes shipped to their residence – using invoices falsified to make it easier for equipment to disappear, and took measures to cover their tracks.

    The FBI began surveilling them, but prosecutors contend in court papers that the Awans likely “knew they were under investigation,” and they wired $300,000 to Pakistan. Federal agents arrested Imran at the airport in July trying to fly to Pakistan, and
    charged Imran and his wife with bank fraud involving money they wired overseas.

    However, months later, authorities
    have not charged the couple with the more serious “unauthorized access” described in the IG’s investigation and backed up by server logs. Capitol Hill officials involved in oversight of the case say the reason is that Democratic employers are acting like “hostile victims” and are refusing to press charges.

    TheDCNF emailed a summary of the IG’s findings — which were never made public — to 40 Democratic offices tied to Imran or his family members. Only one responded, and none would say the office was interested in finding out more or pressing charges if warranted.


    Given Democrats’ keen attention to political cyber breaches in the wake of the hack of the Democratic National Committee and other high-profile incidents, fellow IT aides and Republicans have offered theories to explain their uncharacteristic silence in this case:
    Blackmail or fear of retaliation by the Awans, who could read all the emails and files of 1 in 5 House Democrats, in the form of releasing that data or other information if they dare speak out against them.

    That theory is strengthened by a yearlong investigation by TheDCNF: Court filings and interviews show Imran has been accused of allegedly invoking his congressional position to intimidate immigrants, summoning political favors to make criminal charges go away, ordering witnesses not to cooperate with police, and enlisting police resources to bully people.

    The most egregious incident of possible obstruction came after the IG determined that the House Democratic Caucus server was the epicenter of the suspected cybersecurity breach. There were indications the server might have been secretly collecting data from numerous offices, and it was uploading data offsite, an IG presentation said. Soon after, that entire server-turned-evidence was
    physically stolen, according to three government officials.




    'DEBBIE PROTECTS PAKISTANI SPIES - THREATENS CAPITOL POLICE'

    'In a televised exchange during the Capitol Police’s budget hearing, Wasserman Schultz threatened the Capitol Hill chief of police with “consequences” if he didn’t return the laptop, which authorities were holding as evidence. She hired an outside lawyer to try to block prosecutors from accessing it, paying him with campaign funds, according to campaign finance records.'

    SHE IS NOT IN JAIL RIGHT NOW, AGAIN, WHY?



    Ya GOTTA read the whole article on this entire thing and what they have learned about the Awans...

    Evidently, thanks to Wasserman-Schultz, these terrorist-connected spies have House members by the b@lls and is potentially blackmailing them.....
    .
    .
    .
    .
    ....which made me remember how Barry illegally spied on both US Senators and USSC Justices.... (I always did wonder why Roberts acted so of character when he single-handedly saved Obamacare by arguing Obama's case for him and re-writing their argument, as well as not throwing - as usual - a case about taxes out until there was an attempt to collect the tax (standard practice for the USSC based on the past). There were reports at the time that Roberts and his wife were trying to adopt a child from overseas and it might have brought up to Roberts that his decision / actions regarding that case may effect his attempt to adopt.....


    Wasserman-Schultz's Pakistani spies (and Hillary, who bought and owned the DNC) blackmailing the House after illegally spying on them while Barry was doing the same with Senators after having been proven to have spied on them? Based on all the evidence of crimes committed by Democrats during Obama's administration, anything I snow believable / possible.



    A History Of Alleged Intimidation And Tampering In House Hacking Case Marked By Witnesses’ Silence
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. BULLDOG
    Offline

    BULLDOG Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2014
    Messages:
    45,286
    Thanks Received:
    5,395
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +28,776
    Great cut and paste job. You done good
     
  3. depotoo
    Offline

    depotoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2012
    Messages:
    26,850
    Thanks Received:
    5,997
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +17,459
    I’ve not known of their ever doing such to one of their own. I have seen Republicans do it against one of theirs, though.
     
  4. TheOldSchool
    Offline

    TheOldSchool BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    62,633
    Thanks Received:
    9,981
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    last stop for sanity before reaching the south
    Ratings:
    +43,064
    What a load of horseshit
     
  5. easyt65
    Online

    easyt65 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2015
    Messages:
    43,372
    Thanks Received:
    9,214
    Trophy Points:
    2,140
    Ratings:
    +47,629
    Speaking of horseshit...

    TOS, please explain to us why Debbie Wasserman-Schultz hired a bunch of Pakistani IT spies despite the fact that a simple background check on them later QUICKLY identified them as being connected to terrorists ... and being involved in numerous scams and crimes, like kidnapping and holding their mother hostage while they liquidated assets and spent all of their dead fathers' - their mother's - money?

    This ought to be a really good story....

    Then you can explain why after the Pakistani spies had been discovered committing espionage by illegally accessing classified House files and downloading tera-bytes of information and stealing govt computers / equipment, after being banned from the House, and after being placed under investigation for ESPIONAGE Debbie Wasserman-Schultz ignored all of that, RE-Hired Awan again, and not only gave him illegal access to those same classified House files but also gave him access to every DNC members' e-mail, their usernames, and passwords....

    Bwuhahahaha......
     
  6. toobfreak
    Offline

    toobfreak Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2017
    Messages:
    10,119
    Thanks Received:
    1,907
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +12,108

    If Trump had been doing 1/10th this much you would be livid, which is why no one can take you seriously.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  7. emilynghiem
    Online

    emilynghiem Constitutionalist / Universalist Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    19,710
    Thanks Received:
    2,731
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    National Freedmen's Town District
    Ratings:
    +7,138
    Dear easyt65 Apparently
    their strategy is to exhaust the legal resources and manpower
    on the side of people checking govt, ie the rightwing Constitutionalists.

    If the babies in the house pee and poop in every room,
    the parents are so busy cleaning up, the kids can run amok.

    The kids in the classroom know how to distract the teacher
    this way so they get away with stuff because there are
    more students than teachers, and only one principal for
    all the classrooms in the school.

    That's why they pushed the ACA. Just create a mess
    then watch and let the opposition clean it up. In the meantime
    you get to hold taxpayers hostage and demand govt pay
    for whatever is in the bill until it gets corrected.

    Are the wrongdoers ever held to fix their own messes?
    If we want them to be, shouldn't we change this paradigm
    and require any party or official passing an Unconstitutional
    bill, mandate, policy, ruling or legislation to be in charge of
    all costs to clean up the abuses, damages and debts
    caused by their own parties' actions?

    This is a form of "conspiring to violate civil rights of others"
    If a whole mob of rioters creates havoc to prevent police
    from enforcing laws and preventing violations, the whole
    mob should be charged for conspiring as a group.

    Parties that abuse govt to push unconstitutional agenda
    should be punished as a group, w here everyone who
    enabled, contributed either financially or with actions,
    in that violation should be responsible for correcting the
    damages, costs, debts, abuses and other consequences.

    If the kids who damage a school have to fix it up themselves
    like they do in Asia requring the students to clean up each day,
    they learn to take care of the school not destroy it with vandalism.

    The wrongdoers need to be held for this, not the taxpayers
    and victims of their abuses of govt to violate equal rights
    and protections of others, under "no taxation without representation"

    If your beliefs don't represent us but violated our beliefs and rights
    by Constitutional laws. then you pay for the consequences
    not the victims of those abuses of party media and govt!
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page