Why executing gays is allowed if you are an atheist

Unification

Member
Aug 5, 2018
225
7
16
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.
Not matter, if evidence prove that it saves more people from dying from AIDS than it kills, then an atheist cannot oppose it.

If he is, then he is saying it is wrong based on... faith not on evidence, no?
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.
Not matter, if evidence prove that it saves more people from dying from AIDS than it kills, then an atheist cannot oppose it.

If he is, then he is saying it is wrong based on... faith not on evidence, no?
Religious people are the ones supporting executions and the executions of gay people. Not atheists. Therefore, you’re point is lost in a sea of your colossal stupidity.
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he

Where is your evidence, Comrade?
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
I think he is ref: to Muzzy Sheetheads.
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.
Not matter, if evidence prove that it saves more people from dying from AIDS than it kills, then an atheist cannot oppose it.

If he is, then he is saying it is wrong based on... faith not on evidence, no?

Some facts on HIV:

U.S. Statistics
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.
Lol best of luck in your life, you pathetic loon :itsok:
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th

Unification has, I suspect, set a rather ingenious (or mad) trap in this thread for atheists. What I think he is saying is what moral foundation (if not God--or more precisely religious values) do atheists derive from which would prevent them from killing the "amoral" to save the "moral" or which foundational moral code could they use to justify not killing them. That is my interpretation two cents. Could be wrong.
 
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th

Unification has, I suspect, set a rather ingenious (or mad) trap in this thread for atheists. What I think he is saying is what moral foundation (if not God--or more precisely religious values) do atheists derive from which would prevent them from killing the "amoral" to save the "moral" or which foundational moral code could they use to justify not killing them. That is my interpretation two cents. Could be wrong.
I love that argument. If not for the threat of eternal magical damnation, religious people would run around executing and raping people. And so that fear of damnation makes you “more evolved.” :lmao:
 
If one is atheist, then there is actually nothing wrong with capital punishment for homosexuality.

If execution of 100 sodomites, save 1000 people from dying from AIDS, then it be good thing as far as society and the greater good is concerned.

So if one atheist but contradict the facts, and say it's still wrong to kill gays just based on "faith", even if evidence proves it in the greater good of society, then they be in conflict, no? He he
This thread is funny because in this country it is the religious that support executions and worldwide it is the religious that support executing gay people.

Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:

give it a rest before you get smacked silly again, racist.

Today's Christians in no way support executing gays
 
Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th

Unification has, I suspect, set a rather ingenious (or mad) trap in this thread for atheists. What I think he is saying is what moral foundation (if not God--or more precisely religious values) do atheists derive from which would prevent them from killing the "amoral" to save the "moral" or which foundational moral code could they use to justify not killing them. That is my interpretation two cents. Could be wrong.
I love that argument. If not for the threat of eternal magical damnation, religious people would run around executing and raping people. And so that fear of damnation makes you “more evolved.” :lmao:
Ha ha, no you misunderstand silly rabbit, I explain in other thread, is "atheists" which need fear of damnation since they have no moral compass, until they become spiritual and enlightened and understand truth of own accord.

Like how criminal who have no morals need to be fined or imprisoned since he only respond to fear of material pain and pleasure, not be like Christ and be moral of own free will due to belief in higher power.
 
Really? Christianity supports executing gays?

You're a fucking dumbass
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th

Unification has, I suspect, set a rather ingenious (or mad) trap in this thread for atheists. What I think he is saying is what moral foundation (if not God--or more precisely religious values) do atheists derive from which would prevent them from killing the "amoral" to save the "moral" or which foundational moral code could they use to justify not killing them. That is my interpretation two cents. Could be wrong.
I love that argument. If not for the threat of eternal magical damnation, religious people would run around executing and raping people. And so that fear of damnation makes you “more evolved.” :lmao:

The paradox is hilarious. The atheist cannot justify moral or amoral choices without resorting to hard intellectual vapor lock (smoke pouring out their ears), or Christian values, which then nullifies their claim to godlessness. Unification has got you by the short hairs in this one. Ouch.
 
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th

Unification has, I suspect, set a rather ingenious (or mad) trap in this thread for atheists. What I think he is saying is what moral foundation (if not God--or more precisely religious values) do atheists derive from which would prevent them from killing the "amoral" to save the "moral" or which foundational moral code could they use to justify not killing them. That is my interpretation two cents. Could be wrong.
I love that argument. If not for the threat of eternal magical damnation, religious people would run around executing and raping people. And so that fear of damnation makes you “more evolved.” :lmao:
Ha ha, no you misunderstand silly rabbit, I explain in other thread, is "atheists" which need fear of damnation since they have no moral compass, until they become spiritual and enlightened and understand truth of own accord.

Like how criminal who have no morals need to be fined or imprisoned since he only respond to fear of material pain and pleasure, not be like Christ and be moral of own free will due to belief in higher power.

Same language. Different dialect. Trix are for kids.
 
It’s in your religion’s holy book :itsok:
Then why atheist have a problem with it?

If Holy Book command execution of sodomy practitioners, then this be progressive since disease like AIDS or black plague be bigger killers of humans than guns or warfare.

So if atheist rather everyone die from disease than execute those who practice diseased lifestyle and save others' lifes, then atheist is igorant and backward, and really wants millions of people to die just to save a minority of disease spreaders? Which not be progressive ,but retrogressive.

So this prove that even ancient Levitical Law is more progressive and evolved than atheists are? Ironic no? He he.


th

Unification has, I suspect, set a rather ingenious (or mad) trap in this thread for atheists. What I think he is saying is what moral foundation (if not God--or more precisely religious values) do atheists derive from which would prevent them from killing the "amoral" to save the "moral" or which foundational moral code could they use to justify not killing them. That is my interpretation two cents. Could be wrong.
I love that argument. If not for the threat of eternal magical damnation, religious people would run around executing and raping people. And so that fear of damnation makes you “more evolved.” :lmao:

The paradox is hilarious. The atheist cannot justify moral or amoral choices without resorting to hard intellectual vapor lock (smoke pouring out their ears), or Christian values, which then nullifies their claim to godlessness. Unification has got you by the short hairs in this one. Ouch.
Since you’re an indoctrinated religious zombie, I can understand why you CAN’T understand how that urge you feel to rape and kill can be resisted by atheists. Thank goodness that magical fear was put in you, or who know how many victims you’d have by now.
 

Forum List

Back
Top