Why don't people want to know the truth about 9/11?

[LA RAM FAN]

as usual Gomer, I see your hear to kiss the ass of the resident troll.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

You wont go where the evidence leads , You all seem to distracted by what other 'truthers' have said and in a fever to post idiotic videos that fall far short of rational and factual.

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Look: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-jzNfxKSio&feature=related

Upper picture 1st 2 seconds, lower picture 8 seconds into collapse SYMMETRICAL

great pic there,the OCTA's of course,will ignore the truth though thats its physically impossible for it to explode outwards like that from a mere collapse of a tower and that steel beams weighing thousands of tons dont fly several blocks away and wind up in other buildings several blocks away. the 9/11 apologists that ignore this point are either disinfo agents which a few of them have posted on this thread,or loyal Bush/Obama dupes in denial.

Stop for just a moment and think about the power that "explosion" must have had to hurl tons of steel that far. Now think for a moment and tell us all why there is no recording of the sound of not just that one huge explosion but the hundreds that there would of had to been if it were a controlled demo. And then continue to explain how the explosives were planted so that the planes wouldn't screw up the firing sequence. And then we'll ask you a few dozen other questions that you don't have answers for.

Im sure the explosion shows up in seismographic evidence .

 

[LA RAM FAN]

great pic there,the OCTA's of course,will ignore the truth though thats its physically impossible for it to explode outwards like that from a mere collapse of a tower and that steel beams weighing thousands of tons dont fly several blocks away and wind up in other buildings several blocks away. the 9/11 apologists that ignore this point are either disinfo agents which a few of them have posted on this thread,or loyal Bush/Obama dupes in denial.

Stop for just a moment and think about the power that "explosion" must have had to hurl tons of steel that far. Now think for a moment and tell us all why there is no recording of the sound of not just that one huge explosion but the hundreds that there would of had to been if it were a controlled demo. And then continue to explain how the explosives were planted so that the planes wouldn't screw up the firing sequence. And then we'll ask you a few dozen other questions that you don't have answers for.

Im sure the explosion shows up in seismographic evidence .

They did.,if you had ever done any research instead of listening to these trolls here and the corporate controlled media and corrupt government agencys,you would know they did. I will tell YOU the same thing I told that other loyal Bush/Obama dupe earlier,read the book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING,an answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory-thats an appropriate title of the book since thats all the government version of events is,is a THEORY.THEN come back here.till then you got nothing.

oh and dont bother reading it if you only see what you want to see like so all the other OCTA'S here do. and contrary to what Gomer Pyle Ollie tell you,he knows he is full of shit that that its been debunked.Only the official conspiracy theory of the governments has been debunked.

 

[DiveCon]

as usual Gomer, I see your hear to kiss the ass of the resident troll.

he's not kissing YOUR ass, moron
LOL

 

[SFC Ollie]

great pic there,the OCTA's of course,will ignore the truth though thats its physically impossible for it to explode outwards like that from a mere collapse of a tower and that steel beams weighing thousands of tons dont fly several blocks away and wind up in other buildings several blocks away. the 9/11 apologists that ignore this point are either disinfo agents which a few of them have posted on this thread,or loyal Bush/Obama dupes in denial.

Stop for just a moment and think about the power that "explosion" must have had to hurl tons of steel that far. Now think for a moment and tell us all why there is no recording of the sound of not just that one huge explosion but the hundreds that there would of had to been if it were a controlled demo. And then continue to explain how the explosives were planted so that the planes wouldn't screw up the firing sequence. And then we'll ask you a few dozen other questions that you don't have answers for.

Im sure the explosion shows up in seismographic evidence .

Um, er, well, you see, it um, doesn't. But not to worry, they faked those reports too... Ask any of these guys they'll tell you.

 

[DiveCon]

Stop for just a moment and think about the power that "explosion" must have had to hurl tons of steel that far. Now think for a moment and tell us all why there is no recording of the sound of not just that one huge explosion but the hundreds that there would of had to been if it were a controlled demo. And then continue to explain how the explosives were planted so that the planes wouldn't screw up the firing sequence. And then we'll ask you a few dozen other questions that you don't have answers for.

Im sure the explosion shows up in seismographic evidence .

it did,if you had ever done any research instead of listening to these trolls here and the corporate controlled media and corrupt government agencys,you would know they did. I will tell YOU the same thing I told that other loyal Bush/Obama dupe earlier,read the book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING,an answer to popular mecahnics and other defenders of the official conspiracy thery-thats an appropriate title since thats all the government version of events is,is a THEORY.THE ocme back here.

oh and dont bother reading it if you only see what you want to see like so all the other OCTA'S here do. and contrary to what Gomer Pyle Ollie tell you,he knows he is full of that that its been debunked.Only the official conspiracy theory of the governments has been debunked.

yeah, as if you have ever done research
you spout nothing but troofer nonsense

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

Stop for just a moment and think about the power that "explosion" must have had to hurl tons of steel that far. Now think for a moment and tell us all why there is no recording of the sound of not just that one huge explosion but the hundreds that there would of had to been if it were a controlled demo. And then continue to explain how the explosives were planted so that the planes wouldn't screw up the firing sequence. And then we'll ask you a few dozen other questions that you don't have answers for.

Im sure the explosion shows up in seismographic evidence .

They did.,if you had ever done any research instead of listening to these trolls here and the corporate controlled media and corrupt government agencys,you would know they did. I will tell YOU the same thing I told that other loyal Bush/Obama dupe earlier,read the book DEBUNKING THE 9/11 DEBUNKING,an answer to popular mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory-thats an appropriate title of the book since thats all the government version of events is,is a THEORY.THEN come back here.till then you got nothing.

oh and dont bother reading it if you only see what you want to see like so all the other OCTA'S here do. and contrary to what Gomer Pyle Ollie tell you,he knows he is full of shit that that its been debunked.Only the official conspiracy theory of the governments has been debunked.

I read the debunking the debunking of the debunking of 911 truth movement .
Is that right?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

 

[DiveCon]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj6ZtXt6W90

holy shit
richard gage is a moron
he said the towers were constructed in the 80's

 

[PhysicsExist]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj6ZtXt6W90

holy shit
richard gage is a moron
he said the towers were constructed in the 80's

www.AE911truth.org

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of collapse

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building's destruction

3. Symmetrical "structural failure" – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional

7. Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

www.Buildingwhat.org

1,451 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 11,360 other supporters have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation.


“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Attributed to Mahatma Gandhi

 

[DiveCon]

so, the towers were built in the 80's?


really?

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Attributed to Mahatma Gandhi

No always, sometimes you just get your ass kicked and are forgotten or slink away and hind in your mother basement claiming to be an expert .

 

[SFC Ollie]

1,451 verified architectural and engineering professionals

Or maybe 0.01% of the architectural and engineering professionals in the United States.

 

[KissMy]

Since all of you 9/11 truthers claim it is physically impossible for these buildings to pancake, bend steel & pulverize concrete. Can any of you tell me how much force was exerted once the upper section of the building fell one story / 10ft?

Then tell me how any part of the building could withstand that force.

NIST rejected the pancake theory

holy shit
that guy is an idiot
he used SOLID blocks
that changes the dynamic

Exactly - Solid blocks don't lend themselves to compaction even though they have been broken. Their debris of solid objects create resistance unlike a hollow structure that just forces the air from between the floors.

Anyhow the video does not mention the force generated. Doing a calculation on a 10-lb sledge hammer dropping 1 story or 10-ft creates a force of 10,000-lbs. That is 1,000 times the force the it took just to hold the hammer static in the air. The same goes for the building. The tower was built to hold less than 20 times its static downward force load at a given height. Now dropping a portion of the building 10-ft increased the downward force by 1,000 times. On top of that for every crushed floor the moving mass gained weight & mass. This kept on increasing the force as the building fell.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj6ZtXt6W90

holy shit
richard gage is a moron
he said the towers were constructed in the 80's

AE911Truth.org

WTC Building #7, a 47-story high-rise not hit by an airplane, exhibited all the characteristics of classic controlled demolition with explosives:

1. Rapid onset of collapse

2. Sounds of explosions at ground floor – a second before the building's destruction

3. Symmetrical "structural failure" – through the path of greatest resistance – at free-fall acceleration

4. Imploded, collapsing completely, and landed in its own footprint

5. Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds

6. Expert corroboration from the top European controlled demolition professional

7. Foreknowledge of "collapse" by media, NYPD, FDNY

BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?

1,451 verified architectural and engineering professionals and 11,360 other supporters have signed the petition demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation.


“First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.” - Attributed to Mahatma Gandhi

you already took the OCTA'S to school with these posts here that I quoted you on from this thread.http://www.usmessageboard.com/consp...ives-found-in-world-trade-center-dust-11.html


the trolls also cant get around the FACT that there were many firemen witnesses that survived experienced in explosives who called the invesitgation a half baked farce.also nobody has ever been able to debunk this video.


they could only sling shit in defeat on that thread and their slinging shit in defeat on this thread as well like the monkeys they are.

 

[DiveCon]

rimjob does his cheerleader thing again

 

[SFC Ollie]

rimjob does his cheerleader thing again

Yeah, he likes to cheer on the losers.

 

[eots]

1,451 verified architectural and engineering professionals

Or maybe 0.01% of the architectural and engineering professionals in the United States.

only a complete imbecile would think that anyone not on the on a petition supports the official story

 

[eots]

NIST rejected the pancake theory


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dA5tSQ4uI1k

holy shit
that guy is an idiot
he used SOLID blocks
that changes the dynamic

Exactly - Solid blocks don't lend themselves to compaction even though they have been broken. Their debris of solid objects create resistance unlike a hollow structure that just forces the air from between the floors.

Anyhow the video does not mention the force generated. Doing a calculation on a 10-lb sledge hammer dropping 1 story or 10-ft creates a force of 10,000-lbs. That is 1,000 times the force the it took just to hold the hammer static in the air. The same goes for the building. The tower was built to hold less than 20 times its static downward force load at a given height. Now dropping a portion of the building 10-ft increased the downward force by 1,000 times. On top of that for every crushed floor the moving mass gained weight & mass. This kept on increasing the force as the building fell.

what about the core ? and the floors where turned to dust how could they maintain and even gain weigh t? and how could this resistance not slow the collapse ?