Why don't people want to know the truth about 9/11?

dipshit, you only posted ONE PHOTO

I think he is referring to his avy.
is he actually that stupid?
LOL i guess he is

Oh sure he is he , thinks the beams after being sheared off should have just floated down to the ground in a distinctly non violent manner rather then being flung out into space after being struck by 100,000 tons of mass with increasing kinetic energy.
 
I'm making this real simple because it is real simple. I'll number each point and see if you number each answer.

1) Look at the picture. Its an hour after both planes hit both towers. The north tower is burning and smoking compared to the south tower exploding. If you can't see the contrast, you are a liar.

2) Look at the picture. There are thousands of steel beams lying on roof tops. To send steel beams in all directions that weigh tons there must be an explosive force to blast them in all directions.

jc_001.jpg

After the collapse began the force of the top floors sheared through the support beams and lower floors those floors cushioning the falling mass slowing it throwing out steal beams.

Apparently Miller has never encountered a see-saw. Weight (or mass to use the technical term but I didn't want to lose him in such academic language) is applied to one side of a beam and the other side rises if there is no greater weight on that end. In the case of the twin towers the long beams were quite often put through this phenomenon. But most of the trusses and such were caused by sheering off their supports.

Does that dumbass not know the height of the twin towers?
 
I think he is referring to his avy.
is he actually that stupid?
LOL i guess he is

Oh sure he is he , thinks the beams after being sheared off should have just floated down to the ground in a distinctly non violent manner rather then being flung out into space after being struck by 100,000 tons of mass with increasing kinetic energy.

The beams got sheared off simultaneously by a jet fuel fire. What force sheared the beams? The force that brought the beams down is gravity. To overcome gravity there must be a force. Look at the explosion of the south tower. The explosion is the force. Can you handle 2 pictures?

You can call the picture an avatar. That doesn't change the simple fact its a picture you fucking morons. Keep the dumb shit coming.
 
is he actually that stupid?
LOL i guess he is

Oh sure he is he , thinks the beams after being sheared off should have just floated down to the ground in a distinctly non violent manner rather then being flung out into space after being struck by 100,000 tons of mass with increasing kinetic energy.

The beams got sheared off simultaneously by a jet fuel fire. What force sheared the beams? The force that brought the beams down is gravity. To overcome gravity there must be a force. Look at the explosion of the south tower. The explosion is the force. Can you handle 2 pictures?

You can call the picture an avatar. That doesn't change the simple fact its a picture you fucking morons. Keep the dumb shit coming.

You cornered the market on dumb shit a long time ago.
 
That isn't an explosion, Had it actually been an explosion there would be audio tracks of it. And since no one can produce the sound of an actual explosion, you are once again wrong.

Do play again.
 
The problem seems to be that libs want to believe that fire doesn't melt steel. Instead of accepting the laws of physics they prefer to imagine a conspiracy that involves both republicans and democrats and supported or ignored by the CIA and the FBI. A gasoline truck cought fire on a bridge in San Francisco in 2000. Even though the fire was on the bridge and not in it and much of the heat radiated into the air the metal bridge supports weakened and buckled. Nobody blew the bridge up and nobody blew the Towers up. It was fire.
 
The problem seems to be that libs want to believe that fire doesn't melt steel. Instead of accepting the laws of physics they prefer to imagine a conspiracy that involves both republicans and democrats and supported or ignored by the CIA and the FBI. A gasoline truck cought fire on a bridge in San Francisco in 2000. Even though the fire was on the bridge and not in it and much of the heat radiated into the air the metal bridge supports weakened and buckled. Nobody blew the bridge up and nobody blew the Towers up. It was fire.
correction: this is not a "lib/con" thing
its a it's a paranoid delusional nutter thing
 
It makes people feel important when they "know" something that no one else does.This way they act like they have a different explanation then what obviously happened.

It's like a pretty girl saying over and over they don't consider themselves attractive to get a response from people....It's all about the attention.

Let's call them silly little attention whores.
 
It makes people feel important when they "know" something that no one else does.This way they act like they have a different explanation then what obviously happened.

It's like a pretty girl saying over and over they don't consider themselves attractive to get a response from people....It's all about the attention.

Let's call them silly little attention whores.

99% of Americans are in the same trance as ROZMAN from Brooklyn. They can't see the explosion at the top left because they are in the trance. They completely ignore the explosion.
 
It makes people feel important when they "know" something that no one else does.This way they act like they have a different explanation then what obviously happened.

It's like a pretty girl saying over and over they don't consider themselves attractive to get a response from people....It's all about the attention.

Let's call them silly little attention whores.

99% of Americans are in the same trance as ROZMAN from Brooklyn. They can't see the explosion at the top left because they are in the trance. They completely ignore the explosion.
only an idiot like you can look at that and see and "explosion"
 
It makes people feel important when they "know" something that no one else does.This way they act like they have a different explanation then what obviously happened.

It's like a pretty girl saying over and over they don't consider themselves attractive to get a response from people....It's all about the attention.

Let's call them silly little attention whores.

99% of Americans are in the same trance as ROZMAN from Brooklyn. They can't see the explosion at the top left because they are in the trance. They completely ignore the explosion.
only an idiot like you can look at that and see and "explosion"

Now be fair, It does resemble an explosion. However an explosion that size would have been heard and felt miles away. That's why we know it was a collapse without an explosion.
 
is he actually that stupid?
LOL i guess he is

Oh sure he is he , thinks the beams after being sheared off should have just floated down to the ground in a distinctly non violent manner rather then being flung out into space after being struck by 100,000 tons of mass with increasing kinetic energy.

The beams got sheared off simultaneously by a jet fuel fire. What force sheared the beams? The force that brought the beams down is gravity. To overcome gravity there must be a force. Look at the explosion of the south tower. The explosion is the force. Can you handle 2 pictures?

You can call the picture an avatar. That doesn't change the simple fact its a picture you fucking morons. Keep the dumb shit coming.

No the beams were sheared of from the impact of the upper part of the building as it fell into the lower floors after the impact site lost its integrity.
 
Oh sure he is he , thinks the beams after being sheared off should have just floated down to the ground in a distinctly non violent manner rather then being flung out into space after being struck by 100,000 tons of mass with increasing kinetic energy.

The beams got sheared off simultaneously by a jet fuel fire. What force sheared the beams? The force that brought the beams down is gravity. To overcome gravity there must be a force. Look at the explosion of the south tower. The explosion is the force. Can you handle 2 pictures?

You can call the picture an avatar. That doesn't change the simple fact its a picture you fucking morons. Keep the dumb shit coming.

No the beams were sheared of from the impact of the upper part of the building as it fell into the lower floors after the impact site lost its integrity.

but yet simultaneously offered no resistance...
 
99% of Americans are in the same trance as ROZMAN from Brooklyn. They can't see the explosion at the top left because they are in the trance. They completely ignore the explosion.
only an idiot like you can look at that and see and "explosion"

Now be fair, It does resemble an explosion. However an explosion that size would have been heard and felt miles away. That's why we know it was a collapse without an explosion.

an explosion of what size exactly ?..using what type of explosives. ?..what about sound damping techniques
 
There's 18,736 members on here but 7 conservatives reply with their delusions.

If you can't see the explosion and the steel beams, its not your eyes, see a shrink.
 
I'm making this real simple because it is real simple. I'll number each point and see if you number each answer.

1) Look at the picture. Its an hour after both planes hit both towers. The north tower is burning and smoking compared to the south tower exploding. If you can't see the contrast, you are a liar.

2) Look at the picture. There are thousands of steel beams lying on roof tops. To send steel beams in all directions that weigh tons there must be an explosive force to blast them in all directions.

jc_001.jpg

All the beams are straight. How did they pop out straight? Here comes more stupid shit.
 

Forum List

Back
Top