Why does the size of government always increase under Repug presidents?

Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

It's not hard to figure. Lefties are always desperate for a fake hypocrisy issue because they have nothing else. People like you demanded bigger government fazie, and then you turned on the government that gave you the entitlements because you envision bigger entitlements down the road under socialism.
 
Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

See my avatar, it explains it perfectly.

"progressive socialists don't discriminate based off party, they are in both"
 
Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

It's not hard to figure. Lefties are always desperate for a fake hypocrisy issue because they have nothing else. People like you demanded bigger government fazie, and then you turned on the government that gave you the entitlements because you envision bigger entitlements down the road under socialism.

Like Medicare PartD? aka the pill bill?
 
The size, scope and cost of government has increased under every administration for decades now.

As far as growth of government is concerned, there is absolutely no difference between the two parties.
 
Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

You're joking, right?
 
Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

You have it backwards.
There is a big difference between policy's and government programs.
Under Carter we had a new Department of Energy
A new Department of Education.
Under Obama we have a new Health Care Department and 16,000 new jobs in the IRS.

Under GWB we have Homeland Security, a huge increase in government and a redundant one at that. American's have also feared ID Cards and Government Agents; we generally like local control especially for our schools and police agencies.

Not only was the concept wrongheaded, funding for 'security' has been wasted as each member of congress, senate and house, has gotten government largess for their state and district. So much so that our ports remain vulnerable, our chemical and petrolium industries too, our water supplies and railroads remain easy targets and our borders can't keep out dope.

How can they expect to get each person intent on harming us when they have no concern for their own life? Tim McVeigh was able to procure enough legal comonents to create a horrific explosion and instill fear in us all, and he didn't intend on killing himself.
 
Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

Reagan did it to beat Russia.
Bush jr did it in response to 9/11

No one has made a single move to shrink it down.

The last time pols cared one wit about the Constitution was before Wilson.

Since then it's been gimmie gimmie gimmie.

Now the left is pissed at big guv b/c they can't get high or drink raw milk. :lol:

You asked for the government to be your daddy, you got it. And if the GOP tries to shrink it down you will stand against it.

morans get what morans deserve.
 
Why did the size of government increase under Bush and Reagan and why was the size of government less under Carter and Clinton? Repugs are supposed to be less government but it looks like they are the party of big government.

It's not hard to figure. Lefties are always desperate for a fake hypocrisy issue because they have nothing else. People like you demanded bigger government fazie, and then you turned on the government that gave you the entitlements because you envision bigger entitlements down the road under socialism.

Like Medicare PartD? aka the pill bill?

We loved our grandmas just as much as you guys did.

Now we want to turn them into soylent green. :eusa_whistle:



edit; You have to pay a premium to get Part D to a private ins co. Also, last I checked, it was on budget.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top