Why Does the Left Spend More Time Talking about Republican Candidates Then Their Own Candidates?

actually leftard Trump didn't say anything Obama's surrogates didn't say when McCain ran. in fact the Left said MUCH WORSE; calling McCain a traitor who gave up information for special treatment

libs are douchebag hypocrites
I think what right wingers have been saying about McCain has been worse. It's coming from those who are supposed to be "his" people.


I notice that you come from the MOST CORRUPT city in the United States Rdean. I am wondering with all your blather; how did that governors race come out for you leftists-) I hear Mr Quinnochio is going to run for dogcatcher. Has he got your vote? I know Hilly was born there, but can she even carry Illinois, hehehehehehehe.

In any case, we conservatives should enjoy these phoney-baloneys talking about our candidates. The harder they try and convince you one is a dog, the more you should realize they are not.

Just consider...................most of these people believe that Hilly is the end all, be all. Their second choice is an avowed socialist named Bernie, lol. They also support the very Reverend Sharpton, Jesse, and Wright. They believe in the brilliance of Kerry, Jarret, Rice, and the soothing words of Josh Earnest. In fact, their leader of their party is someone called "Wasserman (I know nothing, nothing) Shultz." Colonel Hogan would be so proud!

After looking at this stable of nin-com-poops, why would you take seriously anything they have to say? Non of the people I listed can carry on a conversation with any honesty; and the American people have realized it..........finally.

Just laugh at the left. Nobody actually believes them anymore, so what do we care what they say about any of our candidates. All we should care about is what WE say, along with the independents. Right now, it looks like the left might be snickering all the way to the unemployment line, so let them carry on with their arrogant tude; we really do not care until election day.
rdean simply does NOT understand that you DON'T vote FOR a retard even if they are Negro or female or homo. You vote on merit and ability and ethics. rdean wants respect? Fine quit sending the following CRAP to office.
 
What candidates? I'd be ashamed of what they running if I were a Democrat. so instead they do the dirty work by posting all the smears of Republicans for the Democrat party

the democrat party calls them: useful tools
 
What candidates? I'd be ashamed of what they running if I were a Democrat. so instead they do the dirty work by posting all the smears of Republicans for the Democrat party

the democrat party calls them: useful tools


Yes Steph, and if you notice, the most honorable and reasonable running for the democrats, can't even get 10%. All the democrats want to hear from any candidate running on their ticket is their favorite buzzwords, and catchphrases. Their whole campaign is always a bunch of platitudes, never any substance. When they do actually have to put up substance, what do the candidates do? Why lie of course. Their mouthpieces here, there, and everywhere have to spin (use propaganda) so much, if you look closely, they all wear Beanie and Cecil helicopter hats.
 
What candidates? I'd be ashamed of what they running if I were a Democrat. so instead they do the dirty work by posting all the smears of Republicans for the Democrat party

the democrat party calls them: useful tools


Yes Steph, and if you notice, the most honorable and reasonable running for the democrats, can't even get 10%. All the democrats want to hear from any candidate running on their ticket is their favorite buzzwords, and catchphrases. Their whole campaign is always a bunch of platitudes, never any substance. When they do actually have to put up substance, what do the candidates do? Why lie of course. Their mouthpieces here, there, and everywhere have to spin (use propaganda) so much, if you look closely, they all wear Beanie and Cecil helicopter hats.

true, they swooned over Hope and change. Fainted when Obama said he was going to stop the seas rising and heal thy planet.
this is what the rest of us up against in this country. low information voters
 
Here's why. they take their voters for IDIOTS. They won't even answer a freaking question.

SNIP:

Hillary on Keystone: You’ll have to wait for my election to get my position
posted at 12:01 pm on July 28, 2015 by Ed Morrissey
  • 75 SHARES



Profiles in Courage this ain’t. As Hillary Clinton points out when asked directly whether she would approve the Keystone Pipeline, the proposal for this project came to State in 2009, which meant that Hillary had almost four years to deal with the issues. Under her tenure as Secretary, the State Department concluded that there would only be a limited environmental impact from Keystone, later demanding (and getting) a route change to lessen even that risk.

So where does Hillary stand on this? After six years, she won’t tell you … unless you make her President:


Q: As President, would you sign a bill — yes or no, please — in favor of allowing the Keystone XL Pipeline?

HC: Well, as you know, I was the Secretary of State who started that process. I was the one who put into place the investigation. I have now passed it off, as obvious because I’m no longer there, to Secretary Kerry. This is President Obama’s decision, and I am not going second-guess him, because I was in a position to set this in motion, and I do not think that would be the right thing to do. So I want to wait to see what he and Secretary Kerry decide. If it’s undecided when I become President, I will answer your question!

all of it here:
Hillary on Keystone You ll have to wait for my election to get my position Hot Air
 
Last edited:
Dont their three wrinkled, old, White and rich candidates have anything interesting to say?
Because they're all worthless, old and stale.

My lifelong DEMOCRAT friend just told me he plans to vote for TRUMP.


If he stays consistent and doesn't get to far off message, I have been saying all along he will have many democrats voting for him. He is the 1st candidate in a very long time, who actually HAS a job, and his job creates thousands of other jobs.

I mean, no matter what you think, most people are not totally stupid. When someone like that says he is going to create jobs, or stop bad trade deals, who is the American public going to believe is more competent at that, him, a different republican candidate, or Hillary? I mean seriously here, we here the left tell everyone/anyone who will listen how GREAT Hillary will be as President when dealing with other nations. Why in the world according to them? Because she was SECRETARY OF STATE.

Ok, then using the lefts logic, Trump would have to be the best for economics and trade deals, and the best for shutting down useless agencies like the department of Ed, the EPA, and the housing administration. All he will do is call the heads of these departments in and say, "your fired!" Done deal.
 
^ Reactionary defender of Redistribution and Collectivism. Can't ever learn from past mistakes
:)

Learn the definitions, what they actually mean. You and your ilk are living in an imaginary and wondrous landscape unrecognizable to Americans left of center to right of center. You make statements about the past, which is your right, but when you are asked for facts and stats and real sources, you merely double down on the silly opinions.
 
Nyvin has pinned Two Thumbs and timed him out. Context, TT, context. You have not been able to hold a point at all in this thread or on your OP. That's why you have deflected.
he didn't pin jack

I followed the flow of the subjects as they went.

the left talks about con pols b/c people like to bitch when they have nothing to support in reality.

like socialism, in reality is a truly vile form of politics that ends with the country in ruins.

ex; nazi germany
ussr
North Korea
most african nations
most South American nations
most Central American nations
Greece
Spain
Italy
Ireland

And lets not forget to mention the billions upon billions that are murdered to enforce socialism.

making the assertion that socialism works, on paper, when history tells you it ACTUALLY fails....
Those are bullet points without sources, without facts, without real discussion.

And you ignored Great Britain, Ireland, France, Denmark, Finland, Scandinavia, S. Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, etc.

Try, please.
 
^ Reactionary defender of Redistribution and Collectivism. Can't ever learn from past mistakes
:)

Learn the definitions, what they actually mean. You and your ilk are living in an imaginary and wondrous landscape unrecognizable to Americans left of center to right of center. You make statements about the past, which is your right, but when you are asked for facts and stats and real sources, you merely double down on the silly opinions.

Jake your time tested and failed redistribution schemes and ideas are failing even today in broad daylight.

Greece is the latest in a string of socialist casualties.

We cannot sustain a system meant to fail. I know you have your custom fitted Obama SS uniform ready for the collapse. That's why you're a dependable Fascist cheerleader
 
^ Reactionary defender of Redistribution and Collectivism. Can't ever learn from past mistakes
:)

Learn the definitions, what they actually mean. You and your ilk are living in an imaginary and wondrous landscape unrecognizable to Americans left of center to right of center. You make statements about the past, which is your right, but when you are asked for facts and stats and real sources, you merely double down on the silly opinions.

Jake your time tested and failed redistribution schemes and ideas are failing even today in broad daylight.

Greece is the latest in a string of socialist casualties.

We cannot sustain a system meant to fail. I know you have your custom fitted Obama SS uniform ready for the collapse. That's why you're a dependable Fascist cheerleader

I don't have much respect for someone who first came off as some "responsible Republican" when they were nothing of the sort. I stuck him on ignore a LONG time ago
 
^ Reactionary defender of Redistribution and Collectivism. Can't ever learn from past mistakes
:)

Learn the definitions, what they actually mean. You and your ilk are living in an imaginary and wondrous landscape unrecognizable to Americans left of center to right of center. You make statements about the past, which is your right, but when you are asked for facts and stats and real sources, you merely double down on the silly opinions.

Jake your time tested and failed redistribution schemes and ideas are failing even today in broad daylight.

Greece is the latest in a string of socialist casualties.

We cannot sustain a system meant to fail. I know you have your custom fitted Obama SS uniform ready for the collapse. That's why you're a dependable Fascist cheerleader

I don't have much respect for someone who first came off as some "responsible Republican" when they were nothing of the sort. I stuck him on ignore a LONG time ago

Oh come on. Jake's the real deal. He's one of the leaders pulling the strings over at Media Matters. Soros calls him daily for an update on how many new Republicans he's won over
 
Jake your time tested and failed redistribution schemes and ideas are failing even today in broad daylight.

Greece is the latest in a string of socialist casualties.

We cannot sustain a system meant to fail. I know you have your custom fitted Obama SS uniform ready for the collapse. That's why you're a dependable Fascist cheerleader
What redistribution schemes? SS uniform? Fascism? You are merely rehashing discarded libertarian phraseology.
 

Forum List

Back
Top